Dimensity 8400 vs Kirin 9030 Pro

We compared the 8-core MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (Mali-G720 MP7) with the newer 9-core HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro (Maleoon 935) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  • Higher GPU frequency (~39%)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 5 nm)
  • 18% higher CPU clock speed (3250 vs 2750 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture
  • Shows better (up to 13%) AnTuTu 11 score โ€“ 1948K vs 1725K
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
  • Has 6 MB larger L3 cache size than the Dimensity 8400
  • Performs 23% better in floating-point computations
  • Has 1 more cores
  • Supports 13% higher memory bandwidth (76.8 against 68.2 GB/s)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1948428
1725229
CPU 623766 515961
GPU 596540 484107
Memory 331200 431535
UX 396922 293626
Total score 1948428 1725229
Samples [313 tests] Less than 3

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 248.7 MB/sec 197.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 189.2 pages/sec 169.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 189.3 Mpixels/sec 168.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 111.1 images/sec 115.1 images/sec
HDR 166.2 Mpixels/sec 166.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 19.8 images/sec 19.3 images/sec
Photo processing 58 images/sec 60.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 7.1 Mpixels/sec 6.14 Mpixels/sec
Samples 45 tests Less than 3
Compute Score (GPU)
12162
Background blur 21.3 images/sec 10.6 images/sec
Face detection 11.1 images/sec 5.64 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.52 Gpixels/sec 0.33 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.71 Gpixels/sec 0.44 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.66 Gpixels/sec 0.71 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 37.2 Gpixels/sec 36.9 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1703.3 FPS 608.9 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 31 tests Less than 3

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 1346 -
Stability 86% -
Graphics test 10 FPS -
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 5948 -
Graphics test 23 FPS -
Section 1 25 FPS -
Section 2 23 FPS -
Section 3 20 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 14034 -
Video editing score 6661 -
Data manipulation score 13175 -
Photo editing score 23584 -
Writing score 17637 -
Phones tested 5 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-24 (Xann)AnTuTu 122143962
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-23 (AYS)AnTuTu 122192420
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-21 (tadslj)AnTuTu 111988365
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-21 (JenKenny)AnTuTu 112063774
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-20 (POCOMAN)AnTuTu 122112771
HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro
No benchmark results yet

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 8400 and Kirin 9030 Pro

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.25 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A725
3x 3 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A725
4x 2.1 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A725
1x 2.75 GHz โ€“ Taishan v124 Big
4x 2.27 GHz โ€“ Taishan v124 Mid
4x 1.72 GHz โ€“ Taishan v124 Little
Cores 8 9
Frequency 3250 MHz 2750 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv8-A
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L3 cache 6 MB 12 MB
Process 4 nanometers 5 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 7 W -
Manufacturing TSMC SMIC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G720 MP7 Maleoon 935
Architecture 5th gen Maleoon
GPU frequency 1300 MHz 933 MHz
Pipelines 7 6
Shading units 128 256
Total shaders 896 1536
FLOPS 2329.6 Gigaflops 2866.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 880 Da Vinci

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4266 MHz 4800 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 76.8 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP -
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Balong 6000
4G support - LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5170 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 7
Bluetooth 6.0 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced December 2024 November 2025
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number MT6899, MT6899Z -
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 8400 official site -
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8400:
    - โ€œDimensity 8400 Ultraโ€ is the same chip as โ€œDimensity 8400โ€ but marketed for better thermals and sustained performance.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
25 (33.8%)
49 (66.2%)
Total votes: 74

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 9030 Pro and Dimensity 8400, or ask any questions
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Edward devtoun February 25, 2026 at 03:11 AM
I would say both is powerful because even tho the kirin is only 7 nanometers and lack of GPU processing, they still maintain the performance
+8 Reply
Avatar
pavlecom August 31, 2026 at 03:27 PM
It's a 5nm masterpiece under electron microscope, the product is matter, not the tool who made it. In the hands of true master every tool is a sophisticated hi-end!
+1 Reply