Dimensity 8400 vs Kirin 9030S

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (with Mali-G720 MP7 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 9030S (Maleoon 935F). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  • Supports 100% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 34.1 GB/s)
  • Performs 63% better in floating-point computations
  • Has 2 MB larger L3 cache size than the Kirin 9030S
  • Shows significantly better (up to 53%) AnTuTu 11 score โ€“ 1948K vs 1273K
  • Higher GPU frequency (~39%)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 5 nm)
  • 20% higher CPU clock speed (3250 vs 2700 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1948428
1273046
CPU 623766 475726
GPU 596540 246367
Memory 331200 279480
UX 396922 271473
Total score 1948428 1273046
Samples [313 tests] [2 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1576
Multi-Core Score
6239
Asset compression 248.7 MB/sec -
HTML 5 Browser 189.2 pages/sec -
PDF Renderer 189.3 Mpixels/sec -
Image detection 111.1 images/sec -
HDR 166.2 Mpixels/sec -
Background blur 19.8 images/sec -
Photo processing 58 images/sec -
Ray tracing 7.1 Mpixels/sec -
Samples 45 tests 2 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
12162
Background blur 21.3 images/sec -
Face detection 11.1 images/sec -
Horizon detection 0.52 Gpixels/sec -
Edge detection 0.71 Gpixels/sec -
Gaussian blur 0.66 Gpixels/sec -
Feature matching 0.15 Gpixels/sec -
Stereo matching 37.2 Gpixels/sec -
Particle physics 1703.3 FPS -
API Vulkan -
Samples 31 tests 3 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 1346 -
Stability 86% -
Graphics test 10 FPS -
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 5948 -
Graphics test 23 FPS -
Section 1 25 FPS -
Section 2 23 FPS -
Section 3 20 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 14034 -
Video editing score 6661 -
Data manipulation score 13175 -
Photo editing score 23584 -
Writing score 17637 -
Phones tested 5 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-17 (Vyx)AnTuTu2023750
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-16 (Alex)AnTuTu2004654
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-10 (Siam)AnTuTu2105375
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-10 (ras)AnTuTu1916912
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-07 (Zulkarnaen)AnTuTu1978838
HiSilicon Kirin 9030S
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-08-07 -> internoAnTuTu1273046

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 8400 and Kirin 9030S

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.25 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A725
3x 3 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A725
4x 2.1 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A725
1x 2.7 GHz โ€“ Taishan v124 Big
3x 2.15 GHz โ€“ Taishan v124 Mid
4x 1.62 GHz โ€“ Taishan v124 Little
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3250 MHz 2700 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv8-A
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 6 MB 4 MB
Process 4 nanometers 5 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 7 W -
Manufacturing TSMC SMIC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G720 MP7 Maleoon 935F
Architecture 5th gen Maleoon
GPU frequency 1300 MHz 933 MHz
Pipelines 7 3
Shading units 128 256
Total shaders 896 768
FLOPS 2329.6 Gigaflops 1433.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 880 Da Vinci

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4266 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP -
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Balong 6000
4G support - LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5170 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 7
Bluetooth 6.0 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced December 2024 April 2026
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number MT6899, MT6899Z -
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 8400 official site -
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8400:
    - โ€œDimensity 8400 Ultraโ€ is the same chip as โ€œDimensity 8400โ€ but marketed for better thermals and sustained performance.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
11 (52.4%)
10 (47.6%)
Total votes: 21

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 9030S and Dimensity 8400, or ask any questions
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!