Dimensity 8400 vs Dimensity 8300

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (with Mali-G720 MP7 graphics) and Dimensity 8300 (Mali-G615 MP6). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  • Has 2 MB larger L3 cache size than the Dimensity 8300
  • Shows better (up to 21%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1948K vs 1604K
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  • Higher GPU frequency (~8%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1948428
1604305
CPU 623766 482670
GPU 596540 432750
Memory 331200 299238
UX 396922 389647
Total score 1948428 1604305
Samples [313 tests] [103 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 248.7 MB/sec 174.4 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 189.2 pages/sec 128.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 189.3 Mpixels/sec 146.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 111.1 images/sec 93.5 images/sec
HDR 166.2 Mpixels/sec 136.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 19.8 images/sec 12.2 images/sec
Photo processing 58 images/sec 37.6 images/sec
Ray tracing 7.1 Mpixels/sec 4.97 Mpixels/sec
Samples 45 tests 50 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
12162
Background blur 21.3 images/sec 16.5 images/sec
Face detection 11.1 images/sec 9.4 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.52 Gpixels/sec 0.43 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.71 Gpixels/sec 0.63 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.66 Gpixels/sec 0.46 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.13 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 37.2 Gpixels/sec 16.7 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1703.3 FPS 1671.3 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 31 tests 27 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 1346 881
Stability 86% 77%
Graphics test 10 FPS 7 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 5948 3688
Graphics test 23 FPS 14 FPS
Section 1 25 FPS 16 FPS
Section 2 23 FPS 14 FPS
Section 3 20 FPS 12 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 2768
Graphics test - 16 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 14034 14649
Video editing score 6661 6419
Data manipulation score 13175 12555
Photo editing score 23584 23328
Writing score 17637 18403
Phones tested 5 models 2 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (AYS)AnTuTu 122192420
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (tadslj)AnTuTu 111988365
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (JenKenny)AnTuTu 112063774
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-20 (POCOMAN)AnTuTu 122112771
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-20 (BISON 010)AnTuTu 122214918
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (192828)AnTuTu 121736165
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-22 (Rittik)AnTuTu 121800238
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-22 (Rittik)Geekbench 7 CPU1244 / 4214
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 (1222)AnTuTu 121746951
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-18 (Qing)AnTuTu 121686350

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 8400 and Dimensity 8300

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.25 GHz – Cortex-A725
3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A725
4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A725
1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715
3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3250 MHz 3350 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9-A
L2 cache 1 MB -
L3 cache 6 MB 4 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 7 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G720 MP7 Mali-G615 MP6
Architecture 5th gen Valhall 4rd gen
GPU frequency 1300 MHz 1400 MHz
Pipelines 7 6
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 896 768
FLOPS 2329.6 Gigaflops 2150.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 880 MediaTek APU 780

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4266 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem - MediaTek T800
4G support - LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5170 Mbps Up to 5170 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 6.0 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced December 2024 November 2023
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number MT6899, MT6899Z MT6897
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 8400 official site MediaTek Dimensity 8300 official site
Successor - - MediaTek Dimensity 8400
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8400:
    - β€œDimensity 8400 Ultra” is the same chip as β€œDimensity 8400” but marketed for better thermals and sustained performance.
Notes on Dimensity 8300:
    - Dimensity 8300 Ultra is identical to the Dimensity 8300 (without "Ultra") regarding technical specifications and performance.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
2010 (77.2%)
593 (22.8%)
Total votes: 2603

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 8300 and Dimensity 8400, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
ItzPocooo October 18, 2025 at 07:10 PM
As a Poco X7 pro user I get 1.7M+ in AnTuTu (12/512 version). Also in 3D mark half of the tests are maxed out...just for info in wild life extreme 1 minute stress test max fps is 102 (average around 80)...That's ridiculously good for a low budget phone!! If you have Poco X6 pro, I suggest you wait for x8 and x9...I think x6 pro also gives excellent performance :))
+23 Reply
Avatar
Tapos Deb March 4, 2025 at 06:15 AM
I want to buy a phone but I confused, which phone need to buy me, pick one in two phone Poco X6 pro vs Poco X7 pro. Thanks in advance
+123 Reply
Avatar
Bob March 16, 2025 at 05:25 PM
Depends on the price, it's 15-30% faster than x6 pro. If x7 pro for you cost more than 15-30% than x6 pro then x6 pro is better value. My current price was 50% more for x7 pro so I went with x6 pro.
+43 Reply
Avatar
Gota May 23, 2026 at 12:23 PM
Bob, Brother you will regret getting the x6 pro after a year😭
0 Reply
Avatar
anon February 23, 2025 at 06:28 PM
Xiaomi 14T vs Poco X7 Pro? (i'm looking for an all-rounder, not just gonna game)
+54 Reply
Avatar
Someone better March 3, 2025 at 10:33 PM
14T if you don't want any ads, doesn't matter actually, both are good, but 14T more all rounder
+22 Reply
Avatar
Dimensity Menace! March 26, 2025 at 01:28 PM
Xiaomi 14T is the better balanced phone. Cameras are excellent as well as performance is very good.. doesn't heat up too and it's more optimized in daily tasks than Poco devices which tend to come with ads and bugs. Software support for the xiaomi 14T is also an advantage as it is up there with the flagship Xiaomi 14 series. Overall you are getting a more balanced phone with the Xiaomi 14T and not just gaming.. how long are you gonna be gaming any way?. Lol
+16 Reply
Avatar
Sss September 12, 2025 at 07:24 AM
14t has better camera X7 pro better for gaming (40%) 14t is not bad for low.grfc . Ultra.fps gaming If you want play game with higher quality X7 pro else 14t
+4 Reply
Avatar
medici January 25, 2025 at 11:02 AM
how does the 8400 compare to the 8350? Nanoreview.net isnt acknowledging the chipset yet.
+5 Reply
Serhii January 25, 2025 at 11:40 AM
The only difference between 8350 and 8300 is the new StarSpeed engine, which was developed for gaming.
+26 Reply
Avatar
akp831 February 4, 2025 at 04:50 PM
Serhii, Dimensity 8250 Exists too (Rebranded Dimensity 8200)
+13 Reply
Avatar
Tech January 23, 2025 at 06:27 PM
Dimensity 8400 disappointed all the user by proving it a hoax. It promised to provide antutu score around 18 million but providing score about 15.5m to 16.2m The antutu gpu score is just a little but higher than the dimensity 8300's. It promised to provide 680k antutu gpu score but providing 570k actually.
+58 Reply
Avatar
HunterV July 1, 2026 at 04:25 PM
Hey man, I'm getting 2M points on my Realme GT7T, how come you're getting such less points??
0 Reply
Avatar
Feisel January 18, 2025 at 09:29 PM
MediaTek should have at least used the Cortex-X1 core as the main core in this processor instead of the Cortex-A725. While it may seem outdated, it is better suited for heavy tasks.
+5 Reply
Avatar
A7med January 24, 2025 at 04:04 PM
A725 is better than x1 20%
+10 Reply
Avatar
Z@ved February 2, 2025 at 11:32 AM
A7med, X1 is more powerful than A725.
+18 Reply
Avatar
fuuk1 February 15, 2025 at 03:13 AM
In Dimensity 8000 series, MTK doesn't use Cortex-X cores. Cortex-A725 is better than X1, I think? Also, you can't use cores cross-architecture. I mean, Cortex-X1 is from ARMv8.2-A while Cortex-A725 is from ARMv9.2-A. ^^;
+22 Reply
Avatar
Dimensity Menace! March 26, 2025 at 01:31 PM
Cortex A725 performs like the Cortex X2 core while using 40% less energy.. and the Cortex A7 series cores seem to perform better in sustained performance as well.
+8 Reply
Avatar
Dimensity Menace! March 26, 2025 at 01:31 PM
Z@ved, But X1 heats up more
+2 Reply
Avatar
Adnan Hosen January 10, 2025 at 06:08 AM
I going to buy iqeo 13 5g πŸ€‘πŸ€‘πŸ€‘
+24 Reply
Avatar
John January 9, 2025 at 02:04 AM
Antutu of X7 pro is slightly less than 1.6m
+17 Reply
Avatar
Master January 7, 2025 at 11:10 AM
Dimensity 8400 is powered with Mali G720 MC7 gpu which the cheaper version(less cores) of Dimensity 9300's Mali G720 mp12.
+51 Reply
Avatar
HunterV July 1, 2026 at 04:27 PM
Dude, The dimensity 9000 series have the immortalis GPU while the 8000 is still stuck with Mali.
0 Reply
Avatar
Anonymous January 6, 2025 at 09:21 AM
Why is downlink speed decreased comparing to the previous generation?! It's so ridiculous:/
+25 Reply
Serhii January 10, 2025 at 09:26 AM
I will check it and fix if needed. Thank you.
+8 Reply
Avatar
ivanski January 5, 2025 at 04:25 PM
should i buy x6 pro or x7 pro?
+62 Reply
Avatar
Potato January 9, 2025 at 05:31 PM
Obviously the x7 is better but right now you can find a x6 pro 512gb for 240 or less. I am thinking about it. The 512 of the x7 pro goes for 380 everywhere. You will get one less year of updates but its nearly half the price. I expect the x7 pro to drop price in a few months tho.
+23 Reply
Avatar
JGB January 4, 2025 at 05:33 PM
Not only it is faster than 8300, but it is also around 40% more efficient. You can watch the Chinese Geekerwan channel in YouTube where they tested this SoC recently. It is a massive improvement, similar to what the 8 Elite is to 8 Gen 3 or Dimensity 9400+ is to 9300+.
+28 Reply
Avatar
Poco January 2, 2025 at 12:39 PM
Don't buy me please 😭πŸ₯Ή
+57 Reply
Avatar
Fool Khan January 2, 2025 at 10:19 AM
Just small CPU improvement not more than 15%. Almost similar GPU and small memory improvement. 1.4M+ d8300 vs 1.5M d8400
+21 Reply
Avatar
Dimensity Menace! March 26, 2025 at 01:34 PM
All this while using 40% less power and generates 25% less heat across the soc
+12 Reply
Avatar
Cs Game January 2, 2025 at 04:39 AM
Should I go for Poco X7 pro? Since I have X6 pro... I wonder if it worthy to upgrade to X7 pro...
+45 Reply
Avatar
JOHN January 2, 2025 at 10:16 AM
You can upgrade to X8 pro after you get X7 pro
+18 Reply
Avatar
Poco January 2, 2025 at 12:39 PM
No ,, hold and use x6pro
+10 Reply
Avatar
Qq3 January 4, 2025 at 07:55 AM
Wait for poco f9 or f10.
+10 Reply
Avatar
aceD January 1, 2025 at 05:21 PM
why did they only used a725 ? won't it make this power hungry?
+13 Reply
Avatar
Azp January 5, 2025 at 08:42 AM
No , efficiency is very good
+5 Reply
Avatar
YAMI December 30, 2024 at 10:27 PM
As I expected, this year the same thing happened as with the Dimensity 8100 and 8200, a barely visible improvement, especially in GPU which may be an improvement of only 10% compared to the 8300
+10 Reply
Avatar
Roni December 30, 2024 at 05:30 PM
I thought poco x7 pro will get 1.8M antutu but I was wrong πŸ˜‘
+41 Reply
Avatar
Jhonny sins December 31, 2024 at 10:55 AM
Poco will get 1.7to1.8M Antutu.
+15 Reply
Avatar
Mia Khalifa January 2, 2025 at 10:17 AM
Jhonny sins, No it will be lower than 1.5M as specified here
+6 Reply
Avatar
Hector chan 4t January 5, 2025 at 09:02 AM
Look, at the moment there are still not all the complete features of the processor on the page, just wait until January 10th and it will be complete, and rest assured that the numbers will be close.
+6 Reply
Avatar
Ys khan December 30, 2024 at 08:15 AM
Dimensity 8400 specs 🧐
+48 Reply