Dimensity 9500 vs Dimensity 9400 Plus

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (with Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 graphics) and 9400 Plus (Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9500
  • Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size than the Dimensity 9400 Plus
  • Shows better (up to 31%) AnTuTu 11 score – 3760K vs 2874K
  • 13% higher CPU clock speed (4210 vs 3730 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~6%)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
3760662
CPU 1048345 869347
GPU 1432351 1015558
Memory 476680 357663
UX 803286 632388
Total score 3760662 2874956
Samples [119 tests] [171 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 397.3 MB/sec 359.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 292.7 pages/sec 252.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 328.1 Mpixels/sec 300.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 234.3 images/sec 223.1 images/sec
HDR 328.1 Mpixels/sec 267.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 40.9 images/sec 33.2 images/sec
Photo processing 109.9 images/sec 78.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 10.3 Mpixels/sec 9.25 Mpixels/sec
Samples 29 tests 20 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 47.2 images/sec 49 images/sec
Face detection 26.1 images/sec 28.1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.78 Gpixels/sec 0.94 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 1.31 Gpixels/sec 1.21 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.68 Gpixels/sec 1.5 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.31 Gpixels/sec 0.34 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 91.9 Gpixels/sec 72.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 3324.6 FPS 3826.1 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 14 tests 17 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 3119 2377
Stability 57% 77%
Graphics test 23 FPS 18 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 13319 10715
Graphics test 51 FPS 41 FPS
Section 1 55 FPS 45 FPS
Section 2 52 FPS 41 FPS
Section 3 43 FPS 36 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 5777
Graphics test - 34 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 14375 12340
Video editing score 5995 7385
Data manipulation score 12159 14039
Photo editing score 34571 40750
Writing score 22695 27541
Phones tested 4 models 10 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (weipoh09)AnTuTu 123319530
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 -> ForgolkaAnTuTu 123407758
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-29 -> StevenSAnTuTu 123322691
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Pradip)AnTuTu 123930709
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (hi)AnTuTu 123413066
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (CherePavel)AnTuTu 123215890
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (JJ)AnTuTu 121116490
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-22 (Anand)AnTuTu 122939313
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 -> Syed Shahzaib SubhaniAnTuTu 123103556
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 -> la.mih0AnTuTu 122649888

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 9500 and Dimensity 9400 Plus

CPU

Architecture 1x 4.21 GHz – C1-Ultra
3x 3.5 GHz – C1-Premium
4x 2.7 GHz – C1-Pro
1x 3.73 GHz – Cortex-X925
3x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A720
Cores 8 8
Frequency 4210 MHz 3730 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.3-A ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache 192 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L3 cache 16 MB 12 MB
Process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 9 W 9 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
Architecture Valhall 5th gen Valhall 5th gen
GPU frequency 1716 MHz 1612 MHz
Pipelines 12 12
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 1536 1536
FLOPS 5271.5 Gigaflops 4952.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 990 MediaTek NPU 890
NPU theoretical performance 100 TOPS 50 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 5333 MHz 5333 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 85.3 Gb/s 85.3 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Max display resolution - 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 10700 Mbps Up to 7300 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 6.0 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced September 2025 April 2025
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number MT6993 MT6991, MT6991Z/TCZA
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 9500 official site MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
483 (74.8%)
163 (25.2%)
Total votes: 646

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 9400 Plus and Dimensity 9500, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
LGs May 1, 2026 at 08:47 AM
Not bad, this CPU on 17T Pro from Xiaomi
+1 Reply
Avatar
querty May 2, 2026 at 07:35 PM
hope they made an good job and make it same or better than whats 15T Pro did with the 9400+ in cooling and battery efficiency, i mean 15T Pro is not bad but i want to see the 17T Pro be above vivo x300 pro and Oppo find x9 pro whent it comes to optimization
+4 Reply
Avatar
Abesta June 17, 2026 at 04:59 PM
querty , They did in battery it's the same just a bigger battery but cooling is great it tops 47Β°
0 Reply
Edward devtoun March 7, 2026 at 05:24 AM
So its just a minor upgrade?
+14 Reply
Avatar
Avesta June 17, 2026 at 04:59 PM
Not in gaming looks like
+1 Reply
Avatar
RandomAccessMemory December 11, 2025 at 05:14 PM
Admin in this December update Does Dimensity 9400+ still perform better than 9500? I saw a comment on Snapdragon and Dimensity 9500 that Mediatek payed for that misleading 4million score
+12 Reply
Serhii December 12, 2025 at 08:01 AM
Benchmarks updated. Appreciate your comment.
+15 Reply
Avatar
RandomAccessMemory November 3, 2025 at 07:05 AM
Why the Compute Score of Dimensity 9400+ gpu is 6% better than Dimensity 9500?
+14 Reply
Serhii November 3, 2025 at 07:32 AM
Thank you for your comment. Benchmarks updated.
+7 Reply
Abdulsattar October 28, 2025 at 03:21 AM
Not that huge leap i expected The results are quite close to each other
+9 Reply
Avatar
Lele April 13, 2026 at 04:33 AM
9500 have major upgrade on gpu it's all on architecture new set and new feature
0 Reply
Avatar
TriplerYT October 27, 2025 at 11:22 PM
same gpu 9500 slightly better πŸ™„
+14 Reply