Exynos 2500 vs Dimensity 9500

We compared the 10-core Samsung Exynos 2500 (Samsung Xclipse 950) with the newer 8-core MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (Mali-G1 Ultra MP12) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2500
  • Has 2 more cores
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9500
  • Higher GPU frequency (~72%)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 64%) AnTuTu 11 score – 3760K vs 2289K
  • 28% higher CPU clock speed (4210 vs 3300 MHz)
  • Performs 29% better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 11% higher memory bandwidth (85.3 against 76.8 GB/s)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
2289696
3760662
CPU 771016 1048345
GPU 723824 1432351
Memory 356421 476680
UX 438435 803286
Total score 2289696 3760662
Samples [8 tests] [119 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
3352
Multi-Core Score
10402
Asset compression 390.2 MB/sec 397.3 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 179.4 pages/sec 292.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 218.9 Mpixels/sec 328.1 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 247.5 images/sec 234.3 images/sec
HDR 309 Mpixels/sec 328.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 36.4 images/sec 40.9 images/sec
Photo processing 89.9 images/sec 109.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 12.7 Mpixels/sec 10.3 Mpixels/sec
Samples Less than 3 29 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
18873
25501
Background blur 35.4 images/sec 47.2 images/sec
Face detection 15.1 images/sec 26.1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.45 Gpixels/sec 0.78 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.7 Gpixels/sec 1.31 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.6 Gpixels/sec 1.68 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.31 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 82.2 Gpixels/sec 91.9 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 3446.8 FPS 3324.6 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 2 tests 14 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
3119
Score 2231 3119
Stability 54% 57%
Graphics test 17 FPS 23 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
13319
Score 9397 13319
Graphics test 36 FPS 51 FPS
Section 1 43 FPS 55 FPS
Section 2 35 FPS 52 FPS
Section 3 29 FPS 43 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
16035
Web score 15720 14375
Video editing score 8133 5995
Data manipulation score 11954 12159
Photo editing score 32035 34571
Writing score 22532 22695
Phones tested Less than 3 4 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2500
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-16 -> INFCAnTuTu 112220403
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-01 (Koss)AnTuTu 112437711
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-19 (Yell)AnTuTu 112112394
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-26 -> everviolet12Geekbench 6 GPU18873
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-26 -> everviolet12AnTuTu 112496663
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-04 (Elvin)AnTuTu 113330144
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-04 (SillyKilly)AnTuTu 123461876
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-03 (ISLAH AMINE)AnTuTu 123544347
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-03 (hi)AnTuTu 123485917
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (weipoh09)AnTuTu 123319530

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2500 and Dimensity 9500

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X925
2x 2.74 GHz – Cortex-A725
5x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A725
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
1x 4.21 GHz – C1-Ultra
3x 3.5 GHz – C1-Premium
4x 2.7 GHz – C1-Pro
Cores 10 8
Frequency 3300 MHz 4210 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.3-A
L1 cache 128 KB 192 KB
L2 cache 3 MB 2 MB
L3 cache 16 MB 16 MB
Process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 9 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 950 Mali-G1 Ultra MP12
Architecture RDNA 3 Valhall 5th gen
GPU frequency 999 MHz 1716 MHz
Pipelines 8 12
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 1024 1536
FLOPS 4091.9 Gigaflops 5271.5 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.4
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek NPU 990
NPU theoretical performance 59 TOPS 100 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4800 MHz 5333 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 76.8 Gb/s 85.3 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 -
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5400 -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 12100 Mbps Up to 10700 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 5.4 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced June 2025 September 2025
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9955 MT6993
Official page Samsung Exynos 2500 official site MediaTek Dimensity 9500 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
20 (22%)
71 (78%)
Total votes: 91

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 9500 and Exynos 2500, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
MyMy September 30, 2025 at 12:30 AM
Can't wait to see the latest Samsung Exynos 2600 vs this MediaTek Dimensity 9500.
+2 Reply