Exynos 2500 vs Dimensity 9400 Plus

We compared the 10-core Samsung Exynos 2500 (Samsung Xclipse 950) with the older 8-core MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus (Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2500
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size than the Dimensity 9400 Plus
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
  • Higher GPU frequency (~61%)
  • Shows better (up to 26%) AnTuTu 11 score – 2874K vs 2289K
  • Performs 21% better in floating-point computations
  • 13% higher CPU clock speed (3730 vs 3300 MHz)
  • Supports 11% higher memory bandwidth (85.3 against 76.8 GB/s)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
2289696
2874956
CPU 771016 869347
GPU 723824 1015558
Memory 356421 357663
UX 438435 632388
Total score 2289696 2874956
Samples [8 tests] [171 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 390.2 MB/sec 359.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 179.4 pages/sec 252.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 218.9 Mpixels/sec 300.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 247.5 images/sec 223.1 images/sec
HDR 309 Mpixels/sec 267.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 36.4 images/sec 33.2 images/sec
Photo processing 89.9 images/sec 78.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 12.7 Mpixels/sec 9.25 Mpixels/sec
Samples Less than 3 20 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
18873
21988
Background blur 35.4 images/sec 49 images/sec
Face detection 15.1 images/sec 28.1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.45 Gpixels/sec 0.94 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.7 Gpixels/sec 1.21 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.6 Gpixels/sec 1.5 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.34 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 82.2 Gpixels/sec 72.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 3446.8 FPS 3826.1 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 2 tests 17 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 2231 2377
Stability 54% 77%
Graphics test 17 FPS 18 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 9397 10715
Graphics test 36 FPS 41 FPS
Section 1 43 FPS 45 FPS
Section 2 35 FPS 41 FPS
Section 3 29 FPS 36 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 5777
Graphics test - 34 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 15720 12340
Video editing score 8133 7385
Data manipulation score 11954 14039
Photo editing score 32035 40750
Writing score 22532 27541
Phones tested Less than 3 10 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2500
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-16 -> INFCAnTuTu 112220403
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-01 (Koss)AnTuTu 112437711
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-19 (Yell)AnTuTu 112112394
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-26 -> everviolet12Geekbench 6 GPU18873
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-26 -> everviolet12AnTuTu 112496663
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (CherePavel)AnTuTu 123215890
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (JJ)AnTuTu 121116490
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-22 (Anand)AnTuTu 122939313
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 -> Syed Shahzaib SubhaniAnTuTu 123103556
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 -> la.mih0AnTuTu 122649888

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2500 and Dimensity 9400 Plus

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X925
2x 2.74 GHz – Cortex-A725
5x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A725
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
1x 3.73 GHz – Cortex-X925
3x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A720
Cores 10 8
Frequency 3300 MHz 3730 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache 128 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 3 MB 2 MB
L3 cache 16 MB 12 MB
Process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 9 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 950 Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
Architecture RDNA 3 Valhall 5th gen
GPU frequency 999 MHz 1612 MHz
Pipelines 8 12
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 1024 1536
FLOPS 4091.9 Gigaflops 4952.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek NPU 890
NPU theoretical performance 59 TOPS 50 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4800 MHz 5333 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 76.8 Gb/s 85.3 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5400 -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 12100 Mbps Up to 7300 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 5.4 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced June 2025 April 2025
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9955 MT6991, MT6991Z/TCZA
Official page Samsung Exynos 2500 official site MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
43 (19.5%)
178 (80.5%)
Total votes: 221

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 9400 Plus and Exynos 2500, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!