Helio G99 vs A10 Fusion

We compared the 8-core MediaTek Helio G99 (Mali-G57 MP2) with the older 4-core Apple A10 Fusion (PowerVR GT7600) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Helio G99
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 16 nm)
  • Has 4 more cores
  • Higher GPU frequency (~54%)
  • Supports 14% higher memory bandwidth (17 against 14.9 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 7%) AnTuTu 11 score – 554K vs 516K
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Apple A10 Fusion
  • Performs 2x better in floating-point computations
  • 6% higher CPU clock speed (2340 vs 2200 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Helio G99 +7%
554590
516981
CPU 218545 202669
GPU 43804 63274
Memory 156545 84317
UX 135696 166721
Total score 554590 516981
Samples [313 tests] Less than 3
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
727
A10 Fusion +21%
882
Multi-Core Score
Helio G99 +38%
2047
1484
Asset compression 96.3 MB/sec 57.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 52 pages/sec 38.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 72.2 Mpixels/sec 44.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 38.5 images/sec 14.2 images/sec
HDR 63.4 Mpixels/sec 56.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.68 images/sec 4.38 images/sec
Photo processing 16.6 images/sec 13.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.79 Mpixels/sec 1.7 Mpixels/sec
Samples 82 tests 4 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
1410
A10 Fusion +209%
4352
Background blur 2.02 images/sec 11 images/sec
Face detection 1 images/sec 9.32 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.13 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.1 Gpixels/sec 0.17 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.4 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.16 Gpixels/sec 10.9 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 251.6 FPS 415.5 FPS
API OpenCL Metal
Samples 48 tests 2 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 135 -
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 1 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
346
A10 Fusion +100%
693
Score 346 693
Stability 99% 85%
Graphics test 2 FPS 4 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
10608
Web score 9196 -
Video editing score 6615 -
Data manipulation score 7349 -
Photo editing score 25535 -
Writing score 12807 -
Phones tested 37 models -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 86 FPS
[Low]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 37 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Shadowgun Legends 91 FPS
[Low]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 66 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 48 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 55 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Cubot X70
1080 x 2408
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Helio G99
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-29 (Josh Gay)AnTuTu 12700949
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (bero)AnTuTu 12648184
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Josh Gay)AnTuTu 12699734
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (Arbuziki)AnTuTu 12676516
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (Gigachat 2.0)AnTuTu 12667153
Apple A10 Fusion
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (TeknoPiri)AnTuTu 11497446
πŸ“˜ 2025-08-15 (hellz1)Geekbench 6 GPU4352
πŸ“˜ 2024-02-21 (Cap1bara_tech)Geekbench 6 CPU882 / 1484

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Helio G99 and A10 Fusion

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.34 GHz – Hurricane
2x 1.05 GHz – Zephyr
Cores 8 4
Frequency 2200 MHz 2340 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8-A
L1 cache - 64 KB
L2 cache - 3 MB
L3 cache - 4 MB
Process 6 nanometers 16 nanometers
Transistor count - 3.3 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 5 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G57 MP2 PowerVR GT7600
Architecture Valhall 1st gen PowerVR Series7XT (Rogue)
GPU frequency 1000 MHz 650 MHz
Pipelines 2 6
Shading units 32 32
Total shaders 64 192
FLOPS 128 Gigaflops 249.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 1.2
DirectX version 12 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes No

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1333 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 14.9 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 4 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2 NVMe
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2048 x 1536
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 32MP, 2x 12MP
Video capture 2K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 2K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VC-1
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Qualcomm MDM9645M
4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 12
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 650 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 100 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.2 4.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced May 2022 September 2016
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number MT6789 APL1W24
Official page MediaTek Helio G99 official site -
Successor - - Apple A19 Pro
Further details
Notes on Helio G99:
    - The MediaTek G99 Ultimate is essentially the same chip as the G99, with a slightly higher clock speed and no noticeable performance difference. "Ultimate" naming was added for marketing purposes and could confuse the average consumer.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
215 (50.1%)
214 (49.9%)
Total votes: 429

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A10 Fusion and Helio G99, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
RoPoon January 24, 2026 at 04:02 PM
I still can believe that 2022 cpu cant beat 10 years old cpu in cpu and gpu score and for me even low battery life i would still prefer a10 fusion because of low resolution of iphone 7 and great optimization for ios if you dont mind about extremely small display screen well i would say you will happy with that than low optimization 2022 mid range cpu
0 Reply
Avatar
Bababoi April 7, 2026 at 02:57 AM
Bro Helio G99 is noticeably better than A10 in games, much better optimised for newer games than A10. While benchmarking does show that Apple A10 has damn great GPU and CPU scores, overall G99 is way better. Plus, try taking a phone with G99 then try IPhone 7 again and tell me your experience about it. Because personally when I upgraded from IPhone 7 to a phone with G99, the difference was MASSIVE.
+1 Reply
Avatar
rat January 7, 2025 at 03:43 AM
so, Pova 6 2024 and other phone which have G99 and ultimate ver can't win 10 years old phone
+8 Reply
Avatar
Renz alfred November 21, 2024 at 01:10 PM
Wow even apple is flagship but helio have a slightly better performances but midrange wow
+4 Reply
Avatar
Echo December 8, 2024 at 09:38 AM
Bruh, Apple released the A10 10 years ago (correct me if I'm wrong).
+23 Reply
Avatar
Who March 15, 2025 at 12:21 AM
Echo, G99 is just a modern g90t which launched in 2019 as a midrange chip. 3 years difference between it and a flagship a10 is enough to easily overtake it in cpu multi.
0 Reply
Avatar
llm September 16, 2025 at 12:55 PM
Who, doesnt change the fact that this cpu is worse than a 8 year old iPhone 8 A11. cant believe people actually using this kinda phones, just buy a older flagship
0 Reply
Avatar
zan November 19, 2025 at 02:52 PM
llm, but not recommend for consistent gaming especially even though Iphone 8 has better processor than G99 they have low battery capacity even with optimization
0 Reply