Helio P95 vs Helio G95

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Helio P95 (with PowerVR GM9446 graphics) and Helio G95 (Mali-G76 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Helio P95
  • 7% higher CPU clock speed (2200 vs 2050 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~8%)
Pros of MediaTek Helio G95
  • Shows significantly better (up to 41%) AnTuTu 11 score – 535K vs 380K
  • Supports 23% higher memory bandwidth (17.1 against 13.91 GB/s)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
380202
Helio G95 +41%
535127
CPU 141693 198562
GPU 50250 57845
Memory 68887 113958
UX 119372 164762
Total score 380202 535127
Samples Less than 3 [24 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
456
Helio G95 +47%
672
Multi-Core Score
1541
Helio G95 +24%
1908
Asset compression 81.5 MB/sec 93.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 44.9 pages/sec 50.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 56.2 Mpixels/sec 71.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 27 images/sec 36.8 images/sec
HDR 48.1 Mpixels/sec 61 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 3.62 images/sec 5.29 images/sec
Photo processing 15.7 images/sec 19.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.42 Mpixels/sec 2.86 Mpixels/sec
Samples 52 tests 16 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
n/a
2137
Background blur - 3.45 images/sec
Face detection - 1.88 images/sec
Horizon detection - 0.1 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection - 0.12 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur - 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching - 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching - 6.35 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics - 303.4 FPS
API - OpenCL
Samples - 7 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 177
Stability - 95%
Graphics test - 1 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 421
Stability - 98%
Graphics test - 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
n/a
8389
Web score - 6290
Video editing score - 6017
Data manipulation score - 6984
Photo editing score - 17761
Writing score - 9390
Phones tested - 3 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 51 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 38 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 27 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends - 57 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz - 48 FPS
[High]
Genshin Impact - 27 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 52 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Realme 7
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Helio P95
No benchmark results yet
MediaTek Helio G95
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (Nurbakhyt)AnTuTu 12590155
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-20 (rejaulakash)AnTuTu 11545523
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Rey Firmansyah)Geekbench 6 CPU665 / 1754
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-19 (Stoic-saint)AnTuTu 11502377
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-24 (alvyan)AnTuTu 11545793

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Helio P95 and Helio G95

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2050 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L2 cache 1 MB -
Process 12 nanometers 12 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 5 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name PowerVR GM9446 Mali-G76 MP4
Architecture PowerVR Series9XE (Rogue) Bifrost 3rd gen
GPU frequency 970 MHz 900 MHz
Pipelines 8 4
Shading units 8 24
Total shaders 64 96
FLOPS 155.2 Gigaflops 172.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 2.0 MediaTek APU
NPU theoretical performance - 1 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 1866 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 13.91 Gb/s 17.1 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 10 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 12
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 600 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.0 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced February 2020 September 2020
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number MT6779V/CV MT6785V/CD
Official page MediaTek Helio P95 official site MediaTek Helio G95 official site
Successor - - MediaTek Helio G99

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
352 (12.1%)
2548 (87.9%)
Total votes: 2900

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Helio G95 and Helio P95, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Pro Gamer December 20, 2024 at 01:01 AM
helio g95 is better than g99 but the problem is, heating too much
+4 Reply
Samuel28 January 25, 2026 at 06:13 AM
It has 12nm if it was 7nm its fine Plus gpu is better in power but the efficiency in g57 mc2 on g99 is sometimes close
0 Reply