Snapdragon 695 vs Helio G95

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and MediaTek Helio G95 (Mali-G76 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Performs 2.5x better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 12 nm)
  • 7% higher CPU clock speed (2200 vs 2050 MHz)
  • Shows better (up to 11%) AnTuTu 11 score – 592K vs 535K
Pros of MediaTek Helio G95
  • Higher GPU frequency (~7%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
592015
535127
CPU 237904 198562
GPU 56314 57845
Memory 136317 113958
UX 161480 164762
Total score 592015 535127
Samples [83 tests] [24 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
905
672
Multi-Core Score
2101
1908
Asset compression 102.5 MB/sec 93.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 55.1 pages/sec 50.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 72.9 Mpixels/sec 71.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 40.7 images/sec 36.8 images/sec
HDR 61.6 Mpixels/sec 61 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.46 images/sec 5.29 images/sec
Photo processing 19.9 images/sec 19.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.67 Mpixels/sec 2.86 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 16 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Helio G95 +52%
2137
Background blur 2.26 images/sec 3.45 images/sec
Face detection 0.98 images/sec 1.88 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.1 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.12 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.35 Gpixels/sec 6.35 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 245.1 FPS 303.4 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 23 tests 7 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 177
Stability - 95%
Graphics test - 1 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Helio G95 +17%
421
Score 360 421
Stability 98% 98%
Graphics test 2 FPS 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
9496
8389
Web score 9704 6290
Video editing score 3911 6017
Data manipulation score 8663 6984
Photo editing score 18151 17761
Writing score 13129 9390
Phones tested 21 models 3 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 66 FPS
[Low]
51 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]
38 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite 24 FPS
[Low]
27 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]
57 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Ultra]
48 FPS
[High]
Genshin Impact 19 FPS
[Low]
27 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 42 FPS
[Ultra]
52 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
Realme 7
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Ambar Anand)AnTuTu 12704103
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> Rimaki58AnTuTu 12728985
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu 11583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 CPU917 / 1939
MediaTek Helio G95
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (Nurbakhyt)AnTuTu 12590155
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-20 (rejaulakash)AnTuTu 11545523
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Rey Firmansyah)Geekbench 6 CPU665 / 1754
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-19 (Stoic-saint)AnTuTu 11502377
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-24 (alvyan)AnTuTu 11545793

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Helio G95

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2050 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 6 nanometers 12 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 5 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Mali-G76 MP4
Architecture Adreno 600 Bifrost 3rd gen
GPU frequency 840 MHz 900 MHz
Pipelines 2 4
Shading units 128 24
Total shaders 256 96
FLOPS 430.1 Gigaflops 172.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 MediaTek APU
NPU theoretical performance - 1 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 17.1 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 10 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 -
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 12
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1500 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced October 2021 September 2020
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM6375 MT6785V/CD
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site MediaTek Helio G95 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 - MediaTek Helio G99

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
2947 (64.3%)
1637 (35.7%)
Total votes: 4584

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Helio G95 and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Skree November 12, 2024 at 10:50 AM
I'm comparing the Xiaomi Note 10S (Helio G95) vs. Xperia 10 V (Snapdragon 695). The G95 feels a lot snappier than the snapdragon despite the inferior architecture. At the lower and mid-end, I feel that Snapdragons sucks.
+21 Reply
Avatar
BadOS January 30, 2026 at 03:04 AM
or Sony sucks optimizing their Android OS. πŸ˜…
+4 Reply