Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 665 vs Snapdragon 662 – what's better?

Snapdragon 665 vs Snapdragon 662

Snapdragon 665
VS
Snapdragon 662
Snapdragon 665
Snapdragon 662

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (with Adreno 610 graphics) and Snapdragon 662 (Adreno 610). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v9
  5. GeekBench 5
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (12)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  • Higher GPU frequency (~58%)
  • Supports 7% higher memory bandwidth (14.9 against 13.91 GB/s)
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  • Announced 10-months later
  • Shows better (up to 4%) AnTuTu 9 score – 206K vs 197K
We may receive a commission from Amazon for purchases made using the links below.

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 665
vs
Snapdragon 662

AnTuTu 9

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Snapdragon 665
197753
Snapdragon 662 +4%
206182
CPU 68560 69897
GPU 33421 33653
Memory 39926 45576
UX 55493 55919
Total score 197753 206182
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Image compression 90.4 Mpixels/s 88.3 Mpixels/s
Face detection 12.1 images/s 13.3 images/s
Speech recognition 21.5 words/s 23.4 words/s
Machine learning 16.8 images/s 17.4 images/s
Camera shooting 11.7 images/s 11.2 images/s
HTML 5 1.68 Mnodes/s 1.89 Mnodes/s
SQLite 386.2 Krows/s 503.5 Krows/s

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
Stability 98% 99%
Graphics test 1 FPS 2 FPS
Score 220 371

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 29 FPS
[Low]		 28 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile 28 FPS
[Ultra]		 30 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite 27 FPS
[Low]		 26 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 53 FPS
[Low]		 54 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Medium]		 59 FPS
[Medium]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 30 FPS
[High]		 30 FPS
[High]
Device Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
1080 x 2340		 Xiaomi Poco M3
1080 x 2340
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 665 and Snapdragon 662

CPU

Architecture 4x 2 GHz – Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53)		 4x 2 GHz – Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2000 MHz 2000 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8-A
L2 cache 1 MB -
Process 11 nanometers 11 nanometers
Transistor count 1.75 billion -
TDP 5 W 9 W

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 610 Adreno 610
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 950 MHz 600 MHz
Execution units 2 2
Shading units 96 96
FLOPS 273 Gigaflops 272 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 1866 MHz 1866 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 14.9 Gbit/s 13.91 Gbit/s
Max size 8 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Hexagon 683
Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

Modem X12 X11
4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 13
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 600 Mbps Up to 390 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.0 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced April 2019 January 2020
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM6125 SM615
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
2498 (32.6%)
5153 (67.4%)
Total votes: 7651

Related Comparisons

1. Unisoc Tiger T618 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs Snapdragon 665
3. MediaTek Helio G88 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
4. Unisoc Tiger T618 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs Snapdragon 662
Compare other chipsets (140+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 662 and Snapdragon 665, or ask any questions
Avatar
kurtb 11 November 2021 02:03
Which is good for gaming?
+171 Reply
Avatar
Rs2 20 December 2021 13:11
The 662 is better they might have The same GPU it's Still Better
+61 Reply
Avatar
No name 23 August 2021 15:00
No one gonna talk about the camera perfomance?
+117 Reply
Avatar
Daniel 16 July 2021 12:21
I just bought a device with 662 cant say if there's a difference with 665 cos i haven't used a device with it before but so far i'm really enjoying the device. Its a Redmi 9T 4GB 128gb, plays COD, PUBG and the likes.
+94 Reply
Avatar
Medamine 17 June 2021 16:26
Who's better in gaming sd662 or sd665 ???
+193 Reply
Avatar
Ritesh free fire 26 June 2021 11:34
662 is better for games and also for other purposes
+85 Reply
Avatar
Neeraj Wadhwa 27 May 2021 23:31
665 has a better battery performance over 662 which has 9w against 5w of 655 and the download speed is much higher than the 662.
+85 Reply
Avatar
Icy 16 June 2021 08:52
But battery efficiency of 662 is better than 665!
+21 Reply
Avatar
Wews 17 June 2021 05:09
Icy, nope, sd 665 has 5w and sd 662 is 9w so sd 665 is better in battery efficiency
+39 Reply
Avatar
Quetzalcoatlus 01 June 2022 22:32
Wews, Battery efficiency doesn't resume to only how much energy is transformed to heat.
+2 Reply
Avatar
H.L 23 May 2021 09:14
662 looks to be a ‘tune’ on the 665
+18 Reply
Avatar
Rico 26 February 2021 16:24
Are you sure there is no gap of cpu performance?. 20mhz is big for mobile cpu. This site is unbelieveable
+74 Reply
Avatar
Moj 05 March 2021 19:03
No It's not 20mhz. It's 2mhz!
+121 Reply
Avatar
Error 21 April 2021 04:19
Moj, Ah, you mean 200mhz, right?
+28 Reply
Avatar
Cody 14 January 2021 16:46
Saying they're exactly the same when one has half the download speed is an odd thing to do.
+96 Reply
Avatar
jebeno 09 January 2021 17:24
In my point of view there is one critical difference in favor of the 665: the download speed. The download speed of the 665 is 600 Mbps vs 390 Mpbs for the 662. So the download speed of the 665 is 53% faster than the speed of the 662. This is a big difference for such a critical feature.
+134 Reply
Avatar
hey 07 June 2021 04:35
That is the highest possible download speed....theoretically. To actually have a 600mbps download speed means to be able to download pubg in 3.5 seconds!! That is exactly why theory can't be mixed with real life performance
+10 Reply
Avatar
Zeref 14 June 2021 17:46
hey, 600mbps is not actually 600MB. Both are different. when they say 600mbps we usually divide the same with 8, so 600/8 = 75MB per sec. With that you can download the PUBG with 20 seconds. Which is also a theoretical value.
+17 Reply
Avatar
Anon 29 December 2020 04:25
SD 665 pros: Better LTE modem (X12 -upto 600mbps) SD 662 pros: Support for Wi-Fi 6, India's NavIC satellite system. Not much difference really. Boils down to our network preference [better mobile data(sd665) or Wi-Fi(sd662)].
+82 Reply
Avatar
Amir 06 December 2020 21:53
The limited clock speed makes the big.LITTLE technology almost useless with only 200MHz difference for heavy tasks. I think this is just a temporary solution for overheating problems.
+99 Reply
Avatar
Oscar 16 August 2020 16:51
So basically they're the same chip except the 662 has a slightly slower NPU and 4G modem, has newer Bluetooth 5.1 and virtually identical real-world performance while costing less than the 665.
+561 Reply
РусскийEnglish