Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 665 vs Snapdragon 662 – what's better?

Snapdragon 665 vs Snapdragon 662

Snapdragon 665
VS
Snapdragon 662
Snapdragon 665
Snapdragon 662

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (with Adreno 610 graphics) and Snapdragon 662 (Adreno 610). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (8)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  • Supports 7% higher memory bandwidth (14.9 against 13.9 GB/s)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 665
vs
Snapdragon 662

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Snapdragon 665 +3%
329457
Snapdragon 662
320666
CPU 147902 142183
GPU 24130 23170
Memory 68847 70502
UX 88578 84811
Total score 329457 320666
Samples [9 tests] [13 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 67.9 MB/sec 74.2 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 40.2 pages/sec 37.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 48.5 Mpixels/sec 38.5 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 12.7 images/sec 12.8 images/sec
HDR 44.1 Mpixels/sec 41.5 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 1.82 images/sec 1.65 images/sec
Photo processing 8.45 images/sec 8.62 images/sec
Ray tracing 1.66 Mpixels/sec 1.97 Mpixels/sec
Samples 2 tests 6 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 0.28 images/sec 0.28 images/sec
Face detection 0.14 images/sec 0.14 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.04 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 1.24 Gpixels/sec 1.24 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 22.5 FPS 23.5 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 2 tests 5 tests

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 6072 5767
Video editing score 5062 3680
Data manipulation score 5151 5241
Photo editing score 11822 12485
Writing score 6677 7187
Phones tested 2 models 3 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 29 FPS
[Low]		 28 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile 28 FPS
[Ultra]		 30 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite 27 FPS
[Low]		 26 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 53 FPS
[Low]		 54 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Medium]		 59 FPS
[Medium]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 30 FPS
[High]		 30 FPS
[High]
Device Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
1080 x 2340		 Xiaomi Poco M3
1080 x 2340
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (SR Saani)AnTuTu 11345256
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-10 (bang)AnTuTu 11350459
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-05 (Thomas πŸ‡§πŸ‡·)AnTuTu 11319538
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-10 -> NursAnTuTu 11329457
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-09 -> NursAnTuTu 11329457
Add View all (9)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Absabsabsbsa)AnTuTu 12391827
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 (Kanz)AnTuTu 11349349
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-04 (Wayne)AnTuTu 11338756
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-29 (arsts)AnTuTu 11314539
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-07 (Fahim)AnTuTu 11325691
Add View all (19)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 665 and Snapdragon 662

CPU

Architecture 4x 2 GHz – Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53)		 4x 2 GHz – Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2000 MHz 2000 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8-A
Process 11 nanometers 11 nanometers
Transistor count 1.75 billion 1.75 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 4 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 610 Adreno 610
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 950 MHz 950 MHz
Pipelines 1 1
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 128 128
FLOPS 243.2 Gigaflops 243.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Hexagon 683

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 1866 MHz 1866 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 14.9 Gb/s 13.9 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X12 X11
4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 13
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 600 Mbps Up to 390 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.0 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced April 2019 January 2020
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM6125 SM6115
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 - Qualcomm Snapdragon 680

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
2741 (32.5%)
5704 (67.5%)
Total votes: 8445

Related Comparisons

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs MediaTek Helio G99
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs MediaTek Helio G85 (9)
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (3)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 662 and Snapdragon 665, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
H.L May 23, 2021 at 09:14 AM
662 looks to be a β€˜tune’ on the 665
+45 Reply
Avatar
Cody January 14, 2021 at 04:46 PM
Saying they're exactly the same when one has half the download speed is an odd thing to do.
+102 Reply
Avatar
Quetzalcoatlus September 22, 2024 at 04:18 AM
Firet of all, it's not half, it's 53β„… more, not the same thing. Second of all, it's a theoretical limit. Most networks don't even get you clise to those limita so that's pretty useless most of the time unless you have a very good network.
+3 Reply
Avatar
jebeno January 9, 2021 at 05:24 PM
In my point of view there is one critical difference in favor of the 665: the download speed. The download speed of the 665 is 600 Mbps vs 390 Mpbs for the 662. So the download speed of the 665 is 53% faster than the speed of the 662. This is a big difference for such a critical feature.
+144 Reply
Avatar
hey June 7, 2021 at 04:35 AM
That is the highest possible download speed....theoretically. To actually have a 600mbps download speed means to be able to download pubg in 3.5 seconds!! That is exactly why theory can't be mixed with real life performance
+20 Reply
Avatar
Zeref June 14, 2021 at 05:46 PM
hey, 600mbps is not actually 600MB. Both are different. when they say 600mbps we usually divide the same with 8, so 600/8 = 75MB per sec. With that you can download the PUBG with 20 seconds. Which is also a theoretical value.
+31 Reply
Avatar
Amir December 6, 2020 at 09:53 PM
The limited clock speed makes the big.LITTLE technology almost useless with only 200MHz difference for heavy tasks. I think this is just a temporary solution for overheating problems.
+102 Reply
Avatar
Oscar August 16, 2020 at 04:51 PM
So basically they're the same chip except the 662 has a slightly slower NPU and 4G modem, has newer Bluetooth 5.1 and virtually identical real-world performance while costing less than the 665.
+590 Reply
EnglishРусский