Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 695 vs Helio G99 – what's better?

Snapdragon 695 vs Helio G99

Snapdragon 695
VS
Helio G99
Snapdragon 695
Helio G99

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and MediaTek Helio G99 (Mali-G57 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (31)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Performs 3.4x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows better (up to 7%) AnTuTu 11 score – 592K vs 554K
Pros of MediaTek Helio G99
  • Higher GPU frequency (~19%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 695
vs
Helio G99

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Snapdragon 695 +7%
592015
Helio G99
554590
CPU 237904 218545
GPU 56314 43804
Memory 136317 156545
UX 161480 135696
Total score 592015 554590
Samples [83 tests] [313 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Snapdragon 695 +24%
905
Helio G99
727
Multi-Core Score
Snapdragon 695 +3%
2101
Helio G99
2047
Asset compression 102.5 MB/sec 96.3 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 55.1 pages/sec 52 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 72.9 Mpixels/sec 72.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 40.7 images/sec 38.5 images/sec
HDR 61.6 Mpixels/sec 63.4 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.46 images/sec 5.68 images/sec
Photo processing 19.9 images/sec 16.6 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.67 Mpixels/sec 2.79 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 82 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 2.26 images/sec 2.02 images/sec
Face detection 0.98 images/sec 1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.1 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.35 Gpixels/sec 4.16 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 245.1 FPS 251.6 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 23 tests 48 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 135
Stability - 98%
Graphics test - 1 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 360 346
Stability 98% 99%
Graphics test 2 FPS 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Snapdragon 695
9496
Helio G99 +12%
10608
Web score 9704 9196
Video editing score 3911 6615
Data manipulation score 8663 7349
Photo editing score 18151 25535
Writing score 13129 12807
Phones tested 21 models 37 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 66 FPS
[Low]		 86 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]		 37 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite 24 FPS
[Low]		 -
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]		 91 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Ultra]		 66 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 19 FPS
[Low]		 48 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 42 FPS
[Ultra]		 55 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400		 Cubot X70
1080 x 2408
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Ambar Anand)AnTuTu 12704103
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> Rimaki58AnTuTu 12728985
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu 11583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 CPU917 / 1939
Add View all (113)
MediaTek Helio G99
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-29 (Josh Gay)AnTuTu 12700949
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (bero)AnTuTu 12648184
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Josh Gay)AnTuTu 12699734
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (Arbuziki)AnTuTu 12676516
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (Gigachat 2.0)AnTuTu 12667153
Add View all (404)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Helio G99

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)		 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 5 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Mali-G57 MP2
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 840 MHz 1000 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 128 32
Total shaders 256 64
FLOPS 430.1 Gigaflops 128 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Yes

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 -
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 13
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 650 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1500 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 May 2022
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM6375 MT6789
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site MediaTek Helio G99 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 -
Further details
Notes on Helio G99:
    - The MediaTek G99 Ultimate is essentially the same chip as the G99, with a slightly higher clock speed and no noticeable performance difference. "Ultimate" naming was added for marketing purposes and could confuse the average consumer.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
7321 (57.2%)
5487 (42.8%)
Total votes: 12808

Related Comparisons

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (10)
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (16)
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus (1)
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (19)
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (16)
7. MediaTek Helio G99 vs MediaTek Helio G100 (34)
8. MediaTek Helio G99 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (2)
9. MediaTek Helio G99 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (14)
10. MediaTek Helio G99 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (31)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Helio G99 and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
SD user November 25, 2024 at 06:12 AM
G99 is used in a large number of knockoff tablets on Amazon and various other sites. I would rather pay the extra and know I'm getting a better chip than save a few bucks buying something made by a company that couldn't get a handle on performance for more than half of the life of the company. Unisoc has done better over MediaTek and they're barely used in anything these days. Paying a little more for guaranteed performance over what amounts to a technological joke seems like a no brainer.
+999 Reply
Avatar
erbowe November 3, 2025 at 11:45 PM
"Paying a little more" lmao
+5 Reply
Avatar
akp831 September 30, 2024 at 03:48 PM
Honestly I prefer G99 over SD 695 Screw Qualcomm, they sometimes cut corners in the worst ways possible
-243 Reply
Avatar
Just a random neighbor guy October 9, 2024 at 01:59 PM
You prefer coxtex a76 than coxtex a78, now that's really something hahaahaha
+999 Reply
Avatar
HK13 October 23, 2024 at 03:27 PM
Just a random neighbor guy, 2k video playback over 1k video playback, a76 vs a78 is difference only in paper.
+15 Reply
Avatar
Just a random neighbor guy October 27, 2024 at 07:27 AM
HK13, Difference only in paper? You mean the performance and the efficiency of a chipset does not matter as long as you have the 2k video playback. Nice approved keep it up.
+18 Reply
Avatar
Justokeeptheballing July 1, 2026 at 02:54 AM
Just a random neighbor guy, I pretty sure the a76 cores from g99 are the snap 860/855+ cores that are better than the 778g cores and it shows here
+1 Reply
Avatar
Poco f3 September 30, 2024 at 06:04 AM
Helio G99 MLBB: 78-90 FPS ultra graphics and super refresh rate. CODM: 46-60 FPS medium graphics and high refresh rate.
+109 Reply
Avatar
Angry Tiger June 26, 2024 at 04:16 PM
I can swear that the sd 695 was 6w tdp last year, i even looked it online, where do you get those numbers from, and those gaming frames, what's up with them, they don't make any sense, please be serious would you, no one comes here for more misinformation, Jesus!
+48 Reply
Avatar
Mike August 28, 2024 at 07:43 PM
Yeah, I've noticed that very often are parameters different when they are compared with different devices
+5 Reply
Avatar
Dan June 19, 2024 at 03:28 AM
695 sounds. Found Edge 30 Neo at 170 Euros. I think it's worth it.
+12 Reply
Avatar
Ultra graphics June 6, 2024 at 02:35 AM
How does Helio G99 manage to handle a playable 48fps with ultra setting in Genshin Impact? Meanwhile, the SD695 handles at 19fps in low setting.
-7907 Reply
Avatar
Just a random neighbor guy October 9, 2024 at 02:01 PM
Trust .me both chips can't handle Ultra both chips had a lowest default graphics. Don't trust this site.
+64 Reply
Avatar
akp831 February 27, 2025 at 03:35 AM
Wow, I've never seen a comment with this many dislikes
+12 Reply
Avatar
user unknown April 8, 2025 at 09:21 PM
Funny thing, my Sony Xperia 10 iv can still run genshin impact highest at 30-40fps, A lie g99 can be in ultra graphicsπŸ—Ώ
+3 Reply
Avatar
Nope May 16, 2025 at 07:13 PM
user unknown, Nope never no proof..
+1 Reply
Avatar
Dontknow July 1, 2026 at 02:55 AM
High GPU frequency and efficiency architecture
0 Reply
Avatar
This is a mistake March 13, 2024 at 02:24 PM
No, these frame rate results for the games shown are completely wrong, as they're based on the device illustrated by G99. This device is not globally available, and the company is not known to be global. Its performance varies per manufacturer, but the reality is that the G99 processor achieves only 40 FPS in PUBG. In addition, the frame rates for the rest of the games shown here are also wrong. I suggest you try out this processor with manufacturers such as Samsung, Realme, Oppo, Vivo, and Xiaomi. I guarantee you will find the results completely different and lower than what's displayed here, especially regarding the G99 processor. As for the Snapdragon 695 processor, it surpasses the CPU Cortex-A78 & GPU in strength, consumes less energy (4W), and has better connectivity. As it happens, processor prices differ from one manufacturer to another and between every market in every country. If the Snapdragon 695 and G99 are available at the same price, I suggest you immediately opt for the Snapdragon 695. However, if there's a significant price difference in favor of the G99, you might want to consider buying it. Still, I advise you not to rely solely on the frame rate tests available on this site. Instead, do some research, watch some YouTube videos, or ask people who own the device you're interested in purchasing.
+98 Reply
Avatar
Yers February 27, 2024 at 05:57 AM
Why does my SD695 display 80-90fps in Mobile Legends on Ultra graphics with a super refresh rate, while in COD it only shows 60fps on Ultra graphics? It seems there is some misinformation here.
+138 Reply
Avatar
Tin February 9, 2024 at 05:36 AM
The Snapdragon 695 is superior to the G99. The G99 GPU has fewer shading units and gigaflops, even though they have the same number of execution units. A higher GPU clock speed does not compensate for having fewer shading units and gigaflops, as these elements are critical for fast graphics rendering in high-end gaming. Therefore, the Snapdragon 695 is substantially better.
+79 Reply
Avatar
Hime January 21, 2024 at 05:31 PM
There are two types of G99: the standard G99 and the ultimate G99. The ultimate version has a lower bench but higher gaming fps; it's also an optimizer. You can find it in high-end phones such as Samsung A24 and Infinix Note 30 Pro.
+101 Reply
Avatar
Uki March 16, 2025 at 02:38 AM
Further details Notes on Helio G99: - The MediaTek G99 Ultimate is essentially the same chip as the G99, with a slightly higher clock speed and no noticeable performance difference. "Ultimate" naming was added for marketing purposes and could confuse the average consumer.
+6 Reply
Avatar
Hime November 23, 2025 at 01:28 PM
Uki, Im not talking about market g99 ultimate im talking about the structure of it .it gives its peak on higher priced g99 phones but lower on cheap ones .if you see g99 ultimate on cheap phone it will be worse than normal g99 on higher priced phone i tested it
+3 Reply
Avatar
Cat December 24, 2023 at 10:06 PM
Depending on the phone, the G99 in cheaper phones has very poor performance compared to the same SoC in a different phone. So in some cases, the 695 is better. If you're considering buying a cheap phone with a G99, please check out some phone reviews first. The performance of the SoC can vary greatly.
+53 Reply
Avatar
Potato. October 6, 2023 at 03:53 PM
Obviously, the 695 is better in almost everything, but considering how close they are and how much cheaper devices with the g99 are, my vote goes to the g99. If the devices have similar prices go for 695.
+745 Reply
Avatar
Adam December 24, 2023 at 08:17 PM
Yes, but if you compare the FPS gaming scores, the G99 has a higher FPS in every game. That indicates that G99 is still a superior choice for gaming.
-211573 Reply
Avatar
yesnav December 28, 2023 at 12:30 PM
Adam, The 695 is quite impressive thermally. I played Genshin on medium for an hour and it remained around 40-41 degrees Celsius.
+107 Reply
Avatar
Tech user March 3, 2024 at 06:50 AM
yesnav, It also depends on the surrounding temperature. My G99 reaches up to 39Β°C after playing Genshin for 1 hour.
+37 Reply
Avatar
Dexter February 15, 2025 at 11:58 AM
And why does your comment have 200 thousand upvotes?
+3 Reply
Avatar
icikiwir March 7, 2025 at 12:53 PM
ayy yooo 202k likes and 211k dislikes wtf
+3 Reply
Avatar
Where May 22, 2025 at 03:09 PM
icikiwir, Where Even The dislike Button I Don't See
+18 Reply
EnglishРусский