Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 732G vs Dimensity 700 – what's better?

Snapdragon 732G vs Dimensity 700

Snapdragon 732G
VS
Dimensity 700
Snapdragon 732G
Dimensity 700

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (with Adreno 618 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 700 (Mali-G57 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (9)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  • Performs 3.4x better in floating-point computations
  • 5% higher CPU clock speed (2300 vs 2200 MHz)
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 700
  • Higher GPU frequency (~19%)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (7 versus 8 nm)
  • Supports 15% higher memory bandwidth (17.07 against 14.9 GB/s)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 732G
vs
Dimensity 700

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Snapdragon 732G +3%
531656
Dimensity 700
515647
CPU 216427 185796
GPU 52851 44366
Memory 101029 120419
UX 161349 165066
Total score 531656 515647
Samples [51 tests] [27 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 92.9 MB/sec 87.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 46.3 pages/sec 46 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 61.8 Mpixels/sec 60.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 36 images/sec 34.9 images/sec
HDR 54.4 Mpixels/sec 54.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.62 images/sec 4.33 images/sec
Photo processing 14.8 images/sec 17 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.69 Mpixels/sec 2.5 Mpixels/sec
Samples 15 tests 14 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 2.03 images/sec 1.89 images/sec
Face detection 0.84 images/sec 1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.1 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.01 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.07 Gpixels/sec 3.56 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 230.7 FPS 205 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 10 tests 9 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 133
Graphics test - 1 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 336 321
Stability 99% 98%
Graphics test 2 FPS 1 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 7730 5809
Video editing score 6240 4676
Data manipulation score 7769 6639
Photo editing score 15572 16616
Writing score 9698 8819
Phones tested 4 models 5 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 46 FPS
[Ultra]		 51 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile 36 FPS
[Ultra]		 37 FPS
[Medium]
Fortnite 38 FPS
[Low]		 25 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 63 FPS
[Low]		 59 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 61 FPS
[Ultra]		 52 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 34 FPS
[Medium]		 34 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 56 FPS
[Ultra]		 56 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
1080 x 2400		 Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-22 (zzkyand__)AnTuTu548347
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-09 (jksalcedo)AnTuTu527475
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (M1sTiX)AnTuTu575576
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-18 -> luoinhungproGeekBench CPU752 / 1819
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-18 -> luoinhungproCPU Throttle91%
Add View all (72)
MediaTek Dimensity 700
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-03 (HeartBun)AnTuTu505793
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-20 (Sus Go0d)GeekBench CPU713 / 1916
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-13 (Gelap)CPU Throttle53%
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-13 (Gelap)GeekBench GPU1491
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-13 (Gelap)GeekBench CPU683 / 1924
Add View all (42)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 732G and Dimensity 700

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.3 GHz – Kryo 470 Gold (Cortex-A76)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 470 Silver (Cortex-A55)		 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2300 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache - 2 MB
Process 8 nanometers 7 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 618 Mali-G57 MP2
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 800 MHz 950 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 128 32
Total shaders 256 64
FLOPS 409.6 Gigaflops 121.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 688 Yes

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 1866 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 14.9 Gb/s 17.07 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 3360 x 1440 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem X15 -
4G support LTE Cat. 15 LTE Cat. 18
5G support No Yes
Download speed Up to 800 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.1 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced August 2020 November 2020
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM7150-AC MT6833V/ZA
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G official site MediaTek Dimensity 700 official site
Successor - - MediaTek Dimensity 720

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
2274 (59.7%)
1536 (40.3%)
Total votes: 3810

Related Comparisons

1. MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (2)
2. MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (2)
3. MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (9)
4. MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus (1)
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (9)
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 700 and Snapdragon 732G, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Beem April 11, 2023 at 10:08 AM
I like both of these processors, as I am using both of them. I have a Lava Blaze 5G phone and a Redmi Note 10 Pro Max. I also have an M1 iPad Pro, so I like that processor as well. I bought the Lava Blaze 5G because it is the cheapest 5G phone, and it gets slightly better 5G coverage than the S22 Ultra, thanks to its optimization. This Lava phone is the most affordable 5G option available in India, at just 140 USD. As a result, I get 5G on my iPad and Redmi phone too, which is awesome!
0 Reply
Avatar
Vikash May 23, 2021 at 12:34 PM
Playing game will definitely slow your phone whether you buy Snapdragon or mediatek's phone ...if you are a non gaming user you should go with mediatek otherwise go with Snapdragon ...but yeah let me tell you .. Snapdragon 732g gets heated up more than mediatek 700 ....I have both processor's phone
+122 Reply
Avatar
Me and yoy May 26, 2021 at 01:34 PM
You joking right? Mediatek was the most terrible smart phone processer kirin Huawei and Samsung exynos are way better than mediatek! Mediatek is a trash!
+71 Reply
Avatar
Gilbert May 27, 2021 at 12:04 PM
Me and yoy, Lol do you even hands on dimensity phones?? Don't judge blindly if you don't know anything
+53 Reply
Avatar
Wews June 2, 2021 at 02:07 PM
it depends on the software. Miui always make their phones heat up plus the build quality of redmi, poco and mi phones are the worst. My brother owns a moto g60 which it has sd 732g and it runs games smoothly because his phone has only stock android which is not heavy.
+21 Reply
Avatar
Wews August 15, 2021 at 12:23 PM
Me and yoy, 'was the worst' You still living in 2018? MediaTek have improved a lot Check the market share too They have the highest market share currently
+15 Reply
Avatar
Just a Gamer October 28, 2021 at 04:04 PM
Me and yoy, mediatek processors was good Doesn't heat up easily like Kirin snapdragon or exynos when playing or using for long time
+7 Reply
Avatar
lucna December 2, 2021 at 05:49 AM
Yeah true i do agree. while I don't trust the MTK Helio lineup due to the heat it generates, this dimensity chip is actually run cool and efficient.
+7 Reply
Avatar
BGso January 27, 2022 at 07:27 PM
Well, the camera is also better on snapdragon, they have better ISP.. at least this two compared.
+2 Reply
EnglishРусский