Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 732G vs Snapdragon 695 – what's better?

Snapdragon 732G vs Snapdragon 695

Snapdragon 732G
VS
Snapdragon 695
Snapdragon 732G
Snapdragon 695

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (with Adreno 618 graphics) and Snapdragon 695 (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (9)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  • 5% higher CPU clock speed (2300 vs 2200 MHz)
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 8 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~5%)
  • Supports 14% higher memory bandwidth (17 against 14.9 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 11%) AnTuTu 11 score – 592K vs 531K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 732G
vs
Snapdragon 695

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Snapdragon 732G
531656
Snapdragon 695 +11%
592015
CPU 216427 237904
GPU 52851 56314
Memory 101029 136317
UX 161349 161480
Total score 531656 592015
Samples [51 tests] [83 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 92.9 MB/sec 102.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 46.3 pages/sec 55.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 61.8 Mpixels/sec 72.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 36 images/sec 40.7 images/sec
HDR 54.4 Mpixels/sec 61.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.62 images/sec 5.46 images/sec
Photo processing 14.8 images/sec 19.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.69 Mpixels/sec 2.67 Mpixels/sec
Samples 15 tests 49 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 2.03 images/sec 2.26 images/sec
Face detection 0.84 images/sec 0.98 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.01 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.07 Gpixels/sec 4.35 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 230.7 FPS 245.1 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 10 tests 23 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 336 360
Stability 99% 98%
Graphics test 2 FPS 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 7730 9704
Video editing score 6240 3911
Data manipulation score 7769 8663
Photo editing score 15572 18151
Writing score 9698 13129
Phones tested 4 models 21 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 46 FPS
[Ultra]		 66 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile 36 FPS
[Ultra]		 60 FPS
[Low]
Fortnite 38 FPS
[Low]		 24 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 63 FPS
[Low]		 67 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 61 FPS
[Ultra]		 57 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 34 FPS
[Medium]		 19 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 56 FPS
[Ultra]		 42 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
1080 x 2400		 Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-22 (zzkyand__)AnTuTu548347
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-09 (jksalcedo)AnTuTu527475
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (M1sTiX)AnTuTu575576
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-18 -> luoinhungproGeekBench CPU752 / 1819
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-18 -> luoinhungproCPU Throttle91%
Add View all (72)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench CPU917 / 1939
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-13 (Fernando)AnTuTu584675
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Samsung galaxy tab A9+)GeekBench CPU907 / 2014
Add View all (111)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 732G and Snapdragon 695

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.3 GHz – Kryo 470 Gold (Cortex-A76)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 470 Silver (Cortex-A55)		 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2300 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 8 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 4 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 618 Adreno 619
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 800 MHz 840 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 256 256
FLOPS 409.6 Gigaflops 430.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 688 Hexagon 686

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 1866 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 14.9 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 3360 x 1440 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X15 Snapdragon X51
4G support LTE Cat. 15 LTE Cat. 18
5G support No Yes
Download speed Up to 800 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 1500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.1 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced August 2020 October 2021
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM7150-AC SM6375
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site
Successor - - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
3204 (31.9%)
6830 (68.1%)
Total votes: 10034

Related Comparisons

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (16)
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus (1)
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (16)
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (10)
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (31)
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (19)
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (2)
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
9. Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
10. Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 695 and Snapdragon 732G, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Gayus March 7, 2024 at 08:22 AM
Why is it that Qualcomm's Snapdragon 695 can't capture or play back video in resolutions higher than 1080p, despite having a superior CPU and GPU? Is it because the ISP and DSP are too expensive to support 4k? It's puzzling, especially since even the older Snapdragon 660 was able to capture and play back videos in up to 4k. Why is this the case, Qualcomm?
+77 Reply
Avatar
Frog January 13, 2026 at 01:13 AM
The GPU is inferior and they've cut down the features on 600 series simply because it's the entry level
0 Reply
Avatar
MSN-04 February 9, 2024 at 05:11 PM
Based on my experience with both SD732G and 695 chips, I highly recommend the SD732G. Although both have similarities in gaming performance, the 732G does run at slightly higher temperatures. I trialed both chips on custom ROMs and, to my surprise, the 732G kept pace with flagship devices that use the SD 8 series from Nour Bionic. I tested this using my Redmi Note 10 Pro on a custom ROM; the 120hz display significantly improved performance in gaming. Many unofficial ROMs have a "game spoof" feature, such as a gaming module, designed to enhance gaming performance. This feature allows the 732G to handle 120fps on games like Call of Duty, PUBG, and Mobile Legends. On the other hand, with open-world games such as HSR and Genshin Impact, the phone itself struggles to render them. It can only run these games on medium graphics at 50fps.
+32 Reply
Avatar
Alexander January 8, 2024 at 02:35 PM
Chips made by Samsung always support higher graphics than chips made by TSMMC, but they will be hotter and have poorer performance.
+20 Reply
Avatar
Deliond September 1, 2023 at 03:43 PM
Both processors are essentially the same, but when it comes to performance and stability, the 732G comes out on top. The 695 feels like a dialed-down version in terms of photography and performance. However, it performs better in network and memory handling. Its GPU is marginally better, but still, it doesn't surpass the 732G. Which one do I recommend? It's much like comparing apples to apples. If you have the 695, it's fine; if you have the 732G, that's great too. Both perform competently. But when we pit a Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G with the 732G against a Moto G84 with the 695, the latter impresses more, largely because of its cleaner system. In this context, the actual device using the processor might be the deciding factor.
+38 Reply
Avatar
84D October 4, 2023 at 08:52 AM
If I install a basic AOSP-like custom ROM, such as LineageOS, with no bloatware on the Redmi (based on your theory), it should significantly improve, right? Rooting and pushing its CPU to the limits (using the performance CPU governor) would narrow the gap between it and the Moto even further. With just a minor difference like this, advanced tinkering could easily close the gap.
+17 Reply
Avatar
AMS June 13, 2023 at 07:39 AM
ssd695It can't take 4K video, but it is better in terms of processing. But it doesn't matter because the screen is only 1080. Either you have to choose a 4K camera or 5G, or you have to choose 5G and two 4K cameras.
+57 Reply
Avatar
Well January 6, 2024 at 02:22 PM
The SD695 is truly one of the worst SOCs for cameras. Have you seen the comparison between the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (which has an SD695) and the Redmi Note 10 Pro (which uses the SD732G)? The latter is significantly superior when it comes to taking photos and videos.
+10 Reply
Avatar
Anmol February 25, 2024 at 02:29 PM
Well, Bro, the Redmi Note 10 Pro is now also the best phone in terms of everything, except for 5G connectivity. Its camera sensors are superior to those of the Redmi Note 11 Pro.
+16 Reply
EnglishРусский