Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 700

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 700 (Mali-G57 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Performs 3.5x better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 7 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 15%) AnTuTu 11 score – 592K vs 515K
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 700
  • Higher GPU frequency (~13%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
592015
515647
CPU 237904 185796
GPU 56314 44366
Memory 136317 120419
UX 161480 165066
Total score 592015 515647
Samples [83 tests] [27 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
2101
Asset compression 102.5 MB/sec 87.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 55.1 pages/sec 46 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 72.9 Mpixels/sec 60.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 40.7 images/sec 34.9 images/sec
HDR 61.6 Mpixels/sec 54.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.46 images/sec 4.33 images/sec
Photo processing 19.9 images/sec 17 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.67 Mpixels/sec 2.5 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 14 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
1403
Background blur 2.26 images/sec 1.89 images/sec
Face detection 0.98 images/sec 1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.1 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.35 Gpixels/sec 3.56 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 245.1 FPS 205 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 23 tests 9 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 133
Graphics test - 1 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 360 321
Stability 98% 98%
Graphics test 2 FPS 1 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
9496
Web score 9704 5809
Video editing score 3911 4676
Data manipulation score 8663 6639
Photo editing score 18151 16616
Writing score 13129 8819
Phones tested 21 models 5 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 66 FPS
[Low]
51 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]
37 FPS
[Medium]
Fortnite 24 FPS
[Low]
25 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]
59 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Ultra]
52 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 19 FPS
[Low]
34 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 42 FPS
[Ultra]
56 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Ambar Anand)AnTuTu 12704103
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> Rimaki58AnTuTu 12728985
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu 11583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 CPU917 / 1939
MediaTek Dimensity 700
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Asafe oliveira)AnTuTu 12571874
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-03 (HeartBun)AnTuTu 11505793
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-20 (Sus Go0d)Geekbench 6 CPU713 / 1916
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-13 (Gelap)CPU Throttle53%
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-13 (Gelap)Geekbench 6 GPU1491

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Dimensity 700

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache - 2 MB
Process 6 nanometers 7 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Mali-G57 MP2
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 840 MHz 950 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 128 32
Total shaders 256 64
FLOPS 430.1 Gigaflops 121.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Yes

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 17.07 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 -
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1500 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 November 2020
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM6375 MT6833V/ZA
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site MediaTek Dimensity 700 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 - MediaTek Dimensity 720

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
594 (61%)
380 (39%)
Total votes: 974

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 700 and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Ben August 29, 2023 at 11:54 AM
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A13 5G in a nutshell
+101 Reply
Avatar
rav April 27, 2023 at 03:22 PM
which one is better for gaming and simple photography?
+407 Reply