Snapdragon 750G vs Snapdragon 662

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (with Adreno 619 graphics) and Snapdragon 662 (Adreno 610). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
  • Shows significantly better (up to 77%) AnTuTu 11 score – 566K vs 320K
  • Performs 68% better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (8 versus 11 nm)
  • Supports 22% higher memory bandwidth (17 against 13.9 GB/s)
  • 10% higher CPU clock speed (2200 vs 2000 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  • Higher GPU frequency (~19%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
566483
CPU 242759 142183
GPU 50920 23170
Memory 92020 70502
UX 180784 84811
Total score 566483 320666
Samples [8 tests] [13 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 158.2 MB/sec 74.2 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 67.9 pages/sec 37.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 111.2 Mpixels/sec 38.5 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 55.2 images/sec 12.8 images/sec
HDR 94.1 Mpixels/sec 41.5 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 10.2 images/sec 1.65 images/sec
Photo processing 26.7 images/sec 8.62 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.76 Mpixels/sec 1.97 Mpixels/sec
Samples 3 tests 6 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 5.05 images/sec 0.28 images/sec
Face detection 2.58 images/sec 0.14 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.14 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.19 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.14 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.04 Gpixels/sec -
Stereo matching 3.29 Gpixels/sec 1.24 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 242.4 FPS 23.5 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 3 tests 5 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 333 -
Graphics test 1 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 7576 5767
Video editing score 6985 3680
Data manipulation score 7680 5241
Photo editing score 19274 12485
Writing score 8986 7187
Phones tested 3 models 3 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 58 FPS
[High]
28 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile 37 FPS
[High]
30 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite 28 FPS
[Medium]
26 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 61 FPS
[Low]
54 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 60 FPS
[Ultra]
59 FPS
[Medium]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 56 FPS
[Ultra]
30 FPS
[High]
Device Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite
1080 x 2400
Xiaomi Poco M3
1080 x 2340
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-11 (Jason Baker)GeekBench CPU828 / 1875
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-11 (Jason Baker)AnTuTu556264
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 (Erick Silva)AnTuTu599951
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-28 (Breno)AnTuTu614247
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-04 (JΓ£o)AnTuTu579715
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 (Kanz)AnTuTu349349
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-04 (Wayne)AnTuTu338756
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-29 (arsts)AnTuTu314539
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-07 (Fahim)AnTuTu325691
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-06 (Linode)AnTuTu335094

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 750G and Snapdragon 662

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 570 Gold (Cortex-A77)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 570 Silver (Cortex-A55)
4x 2 GHz – Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2000 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.3-A ARMv8-A
L3 cache 3 MB -
Process 8 nanometers 11 nanometers
Transistor count - 1.75 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 4 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Adreno 610
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 800 MHz 950 MHz
Pipelines 2 1
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 256 128
FLOPS 409.6 Gigaflops 243.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 694 Hexagon 683

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1866 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 13.9 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 32MP 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X52 X11
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 13
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 3700 Mbps Up to 390 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1600 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.1 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced September 2020 January 2020
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM7225 SM6115
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 official site
Successor - - Qualcomm Snapdragon 680

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
159 (86.4%)
25 (13.6%)
Total votes: 184

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 662 and Snapdragon 750G, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!