Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 (with Adreno 850 graphics) and Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (Adreno 840). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
  • Has a smaller size transistor (2 versus 3 nm)
  • Supports 34% higher memory bandwidth (113.8 against 84.8 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 32%) AnTuTu 11 score – 5195K vs 3950K
  • 6% higher CPU clock speed (5010 vs 4740 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~12%)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
CPU 1407243 1112833
GPU 1940214 1494722
Memory 739539 442350
UX 1108982 900177
Total score 5195978 3950082
Samples Less than 3 [283 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Asset compression - 421.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser - 238 pages/sec
PDF Renderer - 286.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection - 330.6 images/sec
HDR - 308.4 Mpixels/sec
Background blur - 40.7 images/sec
Photo processing - 98.7 images/sec
Ray tracing - 14.1 Mpixels/sec
Samples - 79 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur - 51.9 images/sec
Face detection - 24.9 images/sec
Horizon detection - 0.72 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection - 1 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur - 2.04 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching - 0.36 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching - 115.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics - 4390.2 FPS
API - Vulkan
Samples - 50 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 4310 2737
Stability - 67%
Graphics test - 20 FPS
Score 18485 12156
Graphics test - 46 FPS
Section 1 - 52 FPS
Section 2 - 46 FPS
Section 3 - 40 FPS
Score - 6490
Graphics test - 38 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
Web score - 31126
Video editing score - 8963
Data manipulation score - 19422
Photo editing score - 62111
Writing score - 40875
Phones tested - 13 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-24 -> Portugal123AnTuTu 125948164
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-22 (12/512" (RAM/Storage) in GB)AnTuTu 125948164
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-22 (Josh Burton)AnTuTu 124589508
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-20 -> Portugal123AnTuTu 115948164
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-20 (HΓΌseyn Alizade)AnTuTu 125948164
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-11-02 (Demo)AnTuTu 113967740
πŸ“˜ 2026-11-02 (Arsik)AnTuTu 124255778
πŸ“˜ 2026-11-01 (Marshotech)AnTuTu 124252761
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-31 (laxrayx)AnTuTu 124125171
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-28 (AmooArman)AnTuTu 124414147

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 and Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

CPU

Architecture 2x 5.01 GHz –
3x 4.03 GHz –
3x 3.74 GHz –
2x 4.74 GHz – Oryon Gen 3 Prime
6x 3.63 GHz – Oryon Gen 3 Performance
Cores 8 8
Frequency 5010 MHz 4740 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.4-A ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache 192 KB 192 KB
L2 cache 16 MB 12 MB
L3 cache - 8 MB
Process 2 nanometers 3 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 8 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 850 Adreno 840
Architecture Adreno 800 Adreno 800
GPU frequency 1450 MHz 1300 MHz
Pipelines 3 3
Shading units 512 512
Total shaders 1536 1536
FLOPS 4454.4 Gigaflops 3993.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.4
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon

Memory

Memory type LPDDR6 LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 5300 MHz 5300 MHz
Bus 4x 24 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 113.8 Gb/s 84.8 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.1, UFS 5.0 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2540 3840 x 2540
Max camera resolution - 1x 320MP
Video capture 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- H.266 (VVC)
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Qualcomm X105 Snapdragon X85
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 14800 Mbps Up to 12500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 4200 Mbps Up to 3700 Mbps
Wi-Fi 8 7
Bluetooth 6.3 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced September 2026 September 2025
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number SM8975 SM8850-AC, SM8850-5-AC, SM8850-1-AD
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 official site
Successor - - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
296 (85.1%)
52 (14.9%)
Total votes: 348

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
toothpaste November 3, 2026 at 12:46 AM
Looking back to the CPU efficiency gets a bit worse than 8e5 due to its design changes, but not as catasthropic failure as it performs because OEMs hardly working to tune 8ee6 due to its early developemnt with qcom's design causing the risk of overheating, high power consumption. Even gaming centric phones do sustain heat with active cooling, but consumes more power. Nonetheless, the GPU performance, gaming technologies (like upscaling and frame gen), more "Agentic" sound?? and newer packaging method of the physical SoC are a key upgrade over 8e5. But this year of year's launch of 8ee6 vs the recently launched flagship SoCs in Android camp is a bit of a mess, even gaming phone still, ended up too expensive. Like Redmi K100 series held on using 8e5 as a cost cutting option. D9600 Pro, its long road to see, especially next year. Even renaming the existing 9600 Pro to Dimensity 9700x (not Ryzen) still sell, but not as too pricey.
0 Reply
Avatar
Sigma October 28, 2026 at 03:00 PM
Absolutely insane that the newer one is actually worse
+3 Reply
Avatar
Ays SarΔ± October 28, 2026 at 05:16 PM
Its not really that worse. I mean we have time to see, because 5 GHz is stupid even if its 2 nm... But Qualcomm can't take risks like they used to. Because we have MediaTek
0 Reply
Avatar
Radovan September 14, 2026 at 12:35 PM
In Antutu benchmark SD 6 pro UX=746233 vs older SD 5 UX=900177. It seems, the new one is not optimized so far. Maybe it will be around 5 mil. points in ANTUTU
+2 Reply
halkcideniz September 23, 2026 at 03:05 PM
ts is aged well buddy
+3 Reply
Anas_Al August 31, 2026 at 06:38 PM
Why is the single-core performance so disappointing? It is still weaker than the A19 Pro!!
+1 Reply
Avatar
Clutch September 2, 2026 at 11:55 PM
Performance will likely be better at launch. Leaked benchmarks are always messed up in some way. I don't know why...
+31 Reply