Exynos 2500 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

We compared the 10-core Samsung Exynos 2500 (Samsung Xclipse 950) with the newer 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (Adreno 840) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2500
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size than the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  • Shows significantly better (up to 73%) AnTuTu 11 score – 3950K vs 2289K
  • 44% higher CPU clock speed (4740 vs 3300 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~30%)
  • Supports 10% higher memory bandwidth (84.8 against 76.8 GB/s)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
2289696
CPU 771016 1112833
GPU 723824 1494722
Memory 356421 442350
UX 438435 900177
Total score 2289696 3950082
Samples [8 tests] [283 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 390.2 MB/sec 421.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 179.4 pages/sec 238 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 218.9 Mpixels/sec 286.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 247.5 images/sec 330.6 images/sec
HDR 309 Mpixels/sec 308.4 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 36.4 images/sec 40.7 images/sec
Photo processing 89.9 images/sec 98.7 images/sec
Ray tracing 12.7 Mpixels/sec 14.1 Mpixels/sec
Samples Less than 3 79 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 35.4 images/sec 51.9 images/sec
Face detection 15.1 images/sec 24.9 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.45 Gpixels/sec 0.72 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.7 Gpixels/sec 1 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.6 Gpixels/sec 2.04 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.36 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 82.2 Gpixels/sec 115.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 3446.8 FPS 4390.2 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 2 tests 50 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 2231 2737
Stability 54% 67%
Graphics test 17 FPS 20 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 9397 12156
Graphics test 36 FPS 46 FPS
Section 1 43 FPS 52 FPS
Section 2 35 FPS 46 FPS
Section 3 29 FPS 40 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 6490
Graphics test - 38 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 15720 31126
Video editing score 8133 8963
Data manipulation score 11954 19422
Photo editing score 32035 62111
Writing score 22532 40875
Phones tested Less than 3 13 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2500
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-16 -> INFCAnTuTu 112220403
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-01 (Koss)AnTuTu 112437711
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-19 (Yell)AnTuTu 112112394
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-26 -> everviolet12Geekbench 6 GPU18873
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-26 -> everviolet12AnTuTu 112496663
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (HoΓ ng HαΊ£i)AnTuTu 123638992
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Nikko)AnTuTu 113512813
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (nminh)AnTuTu 124038854
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Johnnis)AnTuTu 123903835
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (JJJ)AnTuTu 123290752

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2500 and Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X925
2x 2.74 GHz – Cortex-A725
5x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A725
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 4.74 GHz – Oryon Gen 3 Prime
6x 3.63 GHz – Oryon Gen 3 Performance
Cores 10 8
Frequency 3300 MHz 4740 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache 128 KB 192 KB
L2 cache 3 MB 12 MB
L3 cache 16 MB 12 MB
Process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 8 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 950 Adreno 840
Architecture RDNA 3 Adreno 800
GPU frequency 999 MHz 1300 MHz
Pipelines 8 3
Shading units 128 512
Total shaders 1024 1536
FLOPS 4091.9 Gigaflops 3993.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.4
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon
NPU theoretical performance 59 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4800 MHz 5300 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 76.8 Gb/s 84.8 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2540
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5400 Snapdragon X85
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 12100 Mbps Up to 12500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 3700 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 5.4 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced June 2025 September 2025
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9955 SM8850-AC, SM8850-5-AC, SM8850-1-AD
Official page Samsung Exynos 2500 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
54 (21.6%)
196 (78.4%)
Total votes: 250

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and Exynos 2500, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Samantha's Unrequited Lover August 15, 2025 at 08:59 AM
It looks like Samsung as beaten SD in raw GPU power but they are still miles behind in every department.
+21 Reply