Snapdragon 820 vs A13 Bionic

We compared the 4-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 (Adreno 530) with the newer 6-core Apple A13 Bionic (Apple A13 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Apple A13 Bionic
  • Shows significantly better (up to 3.3x) AnTuTu 11 score – 1101K vs 333K
  • Higher GPU frequency (~2.4x)
  • Performs 2.4x better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (7 versus 14 nm)
  • Has 2 more cores
  • 23% higher CPU clock speed (2650 vs 2150 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture
  • Supports 14% higher memory bandwidth (34.1 against 29.8 GB/s)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
A13 Bionic +230%
1101851
CPU 131994 296803
GPU 36166 301818
Memory 63256 149834
UX 102461 353396
Total score 333877 1101851
Samples Less than 3 [47 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
A13 Bionic +391%
1749
Multi-Core Score
A13 Bionic +549%
3989
Asset compression 28.8 MB/sec 146.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 19.7 pages/sec 90.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 28 Mpixels/sec 103.5 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 6.36 images/sec 85.1 images/sec
HDR 25.9 Mpixels/sec 130.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 1.39 images/sec 13.9 images/sec
Photo processing 6.33 images/sec 38.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 789.4 Mpixels/sec 4.69 Mpixels/sec
Samples Less than 3 12 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
A13 Bionic +2642%
13902
Background blur 1.58 images/sec 20.3 images/sec
Face detection 0.86 images/sec 25.6 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.44 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.68 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.05 Gpixels/sec 0.77 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.01 Gpixels/sec 0.19 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.09 Gpixels/sec 45.7 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 81.6 FPS 1367.9 FPS
API OpenCL Metal
Samples - 8 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 2564
Stability - 74%
Graphics test - 10 FPS
Section 1 - 12 FPS
Section 2 - 10 FPS
Section 3 - 7 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 2001
Stability - 70%
Graphics test - 11 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 4378 -
Video editing score 5152 -
Data manipulation score 4144 -
Photo editing score 11831 -
Writing score 5024 -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 57 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 60 FPS
[High]
World of Tanks Blitz - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 59 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Apple iPhone 11 Pro
828 x 1792
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2024-01-05 (Saber)GeekBench CPU356 / 615
Apple A13 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 (nuri)AnTuTu1133524
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 (Ianzzzz)AnTuTu1090244
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 (Ianzzzz)AnTuTu1090244
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-04 (Feonton)AnTuTu915377
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-16 (Slarpunk)AnTuTu1109501

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 820 and A13 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.15 GHz – Kryo
2x 1.593 GHz – Kryo
2x 2.65 GHz – Lightning
4x 1.6 GHz – Thunder
Cores 4 6
Frequency 2150 MHz 2650 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8.4-A
L1 cache 64 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 8 MB
Process 14 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count 2 billion 8.5 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 11 W 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 530 Apple A13 GPU
Architecture Adreno 500 Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 510 MHz 1230 MHz
Pipelines 1 4
Shading units 256 64
Total shaders 256 256
FLOPS 261.1 Gigaflops 629.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.0 -
OpenCL version 2.0 -
DirectX version 11 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 680 Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance - 5 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 1866 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 32 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 29.8 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 4 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.0 NVMe
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2688 x 1242
Max camera resolution 1x 28MP, 2x 13MP -
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- H.264
- H.265
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X12 -
4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 18
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 600 Mbps Up to 1200 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 350 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 4.1 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced November 2015 September 2019
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number MSM8996 -
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 official site -
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
2 (13.3%)
13 (86.7%)
Total votes: 15

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A13 Bionic and Snapdragon 820, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!