Snapdragon 855 vs A11 Bionic

We compared the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (Adreno 640) with the older 6-core Apple A11 Bionic (Apple A11 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  • Performs 2.2x better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (7 versus 10 nm)
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Shows better (up to 32%) AnTuTu 11 score – 824K vs 626K
  • 19% higher CPU clock speed (2840 vs 2390 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Apple A11 Bionic
  • Higher GPU frequency (~82%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
824513
626912
CPU 314517 254993
GPU 125449 116883
Memory 150134 96795
UX 234413 158241
Total score 824513 626912
Samples [39 tests] Less than 3
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
A11 Bionic +13%
1093
Multi-Core Score
2731
1828
Asset compression 126.8 MB/sec 113.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 74.2 pages/sec 58.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 88 Mpixels/sec 82.1 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 57.7 images/sec 23.6 images/sec
HDR 89.3 Mpixels/sec 83.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 9.07 images/sec 10.1 images/sec
Photo processing 20.2 images/sec 29.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.06 Mpixels/sec 3.32 Mpixels/sec
Samples 29 tests 6 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
A11 Bionic +108%
5630
Background blur 4.31 images/sec 12.3 images/sec
Face detection 1.84 images/sec 11.3 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.23 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.25 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.62 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 8.72 Gpixels/sec 12.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 444 FPS 324.3 FPS
API OpenCL Metal
Samples 19 tests 3 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 876 892
Stability 86% 59%
Graphics test 5 FPS 5 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 8813 -
Video editing score 5956 -
Data manipulation score 8239 -
Photo editing score 22485 -
Writing score 13084 -
Phones tested 8 models -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 58 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 56 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Fortnite 28 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Shadowgun Legends 51 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 59 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 57 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
1080 x 2340
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Stanley)AnTuTu 12969794
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Stanley)AnTuTu 11847934
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (pakasraka)AnTuTu 11763477
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (long tran)Geekbench 6 GPU3882
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (long tran)Geekbench 6 CPU1000 / 3025
Apple A11 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-03 (alwayssonqz)Geekbench 6 GPU5436
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-03 (alwayssonqz)Geekbench 6 CPU1075 / 2393
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-13 (TestGame)Geekbench 6 GPU5630
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-13 (TestGame)Geekbench 6 CPU1093 / 1828
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-08 -> TangerineGeekbench 6 CPU1105 / 2629

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 855 and A11 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.84 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)
3x 2.42 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver)
2x 2.39 GHz – Monsoon
4x 1.42 GHz – Mistral
Cores 8 6
Frequency 2840 MHz 2390 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8-A
L1 cache 512 KB 64 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 8 MB
L3 cache 2 MB -
Process 7 nanometers 10 nanometers
Transistor count 6.7 billion 4.3 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 8 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 640 Apple A11 GPU
Architecture Adreno 600 Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 585 MHz 1066 MHz
Pipelines 3 3
Shading units 256 64
Total shaders 768 192
FLOPS 898.5 Gigaflops 409.3 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 -
OpenCL version 2.0 -
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 690 Apple Neural Engine

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 34.13 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 4 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.0 NVMe
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2436 x 1125
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP 1x 32MP, 2x 12MP
Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X24 LTE, X50 5G -
4G support LTE Cat. 20 LTE Cat. 12
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 5000 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1240 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.0 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced December 2018 September 2017
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number SM8150 APL1071
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 official site -
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
754 (62.8%)
447 (37.2%)
Total votes: 1201

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A11 Bionic and Snapdragon 855, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Owwhh Bee Deee February 26, 2024 at 01:10 PM
For me, using an iPhone X feels like using the same camera as the one in the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro.
+29 Reply