Snapdragon 855 vs Snapdragon 765G

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (with Adreno 640 graphics) and Snapdragon 765G (Adreno 620). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  • Supports 101% higher memory bandwidth (34.13 against 17 GB/s)
  • Performs 87% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows better (up to 38%) AnTuTu 11 score – 824K vs 597K
  • 18% higher CPU clock speed (2840 vs 2400 MHz)
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  • Higher GPU frequency (~28%)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
824513
CPU 314517 225992
GPU 125449 68730
Memory 150134 118245
UX 234413 185007
Total score 824513 597974
Samples [39 tests] [11 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 126.8 MB/sec 87.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 74.2 pages/sec 46.3 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 88 Mpixels/sec 61.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 57.7 images/sec 34.9 images/sec
HDR 89.3 Mpixels/sec 55.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 9.07 images/sec 5.41 images/sec
Photo processing 20.2 images/sec 15.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.06 Mpixels/sec 2.58 Mpixels/sec
Samples 29 tests 6 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 4.31 images/sec 1.85 images/sec
Face detection 1.84 images/sec 0.88 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.01 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 8.72 Gpixels/sec 3.33 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 444 FPS 206.3 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 19 tests 4 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 876 446
Stability 86% 99%
Graphics test 5 FPS 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 8813 6739
Video editing score 5956 5699
Data manipulation score 8239 7976
Photo editing score 22485 19870
Writing score 13084 11348
Phones tested 8 models Less than 3

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 58 FPS
[Ultra]
57 FPS
[High]
Call of Duty: Mobile 56 FPS
[Ultra]
38 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite 28 FPS
[Ultra]
29 FPS
[Medium]
Shadowgun Legends 51 FPS
[Ultra]
67 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 59 FPS
[Ultra]
60 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 57 FPS
[Ultra]
55 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
1080 x 2340
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (Pon)AnTuTu 121038764
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Stanley)AnTuTu 12969794
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Stanley)AnTuTu 11847934
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (pakasraka)AnTuTu 11763477
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (long tran)Geekbench 6 GPU3882
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-07 (Gruk)AnTuTu 11641913
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-06 (Gruk)AnTuTu 11641913
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-23 (Guitar91)AnTuTu 11622520
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-29 (mxrcovx13)AnTuTu 11571064
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-22 (Artreg)AnTuTu 11566323

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 855 and Snapdragon 765G

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.84 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)
3x 2.42 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver)
1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 475 Prime (Cortex-A76)
1x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 475 Gold (Cortex-A76)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 475 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2840 MHz 2400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.3-A
L1 cache 512 KB -
L2 cache 1 MB -
L3 cache 2 MB -
Process 7 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count 6.7 billion -
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 5 W
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 640 Adreno 620
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 585 MHz 750 MHz
Pipelines 3 2
Shading units 256 192
Total shaders 768 384
FLOPS 898.5 Gigaflops 480 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 690 Hexagon 696

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 34.13 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.0 eMMC 5.1, UFS 3.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3200 x 1800
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP 1x 192MP
Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X24 LTE, X50 5G X52
4G support LTE Cat. 20 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5000 Mbps Up to 3700 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1240 Mbps Up to 1600 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.0 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced December 2018 December 2019
Class Flagship Mid range
Model number SM8150 SM7250-AB
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
2492 (82.3%)
535 (17.7%)
Total votes: 3027

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 765G and Snapdragon 855, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
BinhHa October 27, 2025 at 05:28 AM
Why not Snapdragon 768g ?
+1 Reply
Avatar
BinhHa September 1, 2024 at 04:15 AM
Why not information Snapdragon 768g ???
+1 Reply
Avatar
sxo June 27, 2024 at 08:26 AM
765g performs real well but it gets real warm while using mobile data
0 Reply
Avatar
sxo June 27, 2024 at 08:26 AM
The 765g performs really well, but it gets really warm while using mobile data.
0 Reply
Avatar
Random March 21, 2024 at 05:17 AM
The 765 chip in most phones is clocked very low, yielding an Antutu score ranging from 280k to 283k. It's rare to find phones with this chip that have a score higher than that.
+5 Reply
Avatar
ProDigit September 24, 2021 at 12:07 AM
855 is faster, but consumes 20% more battery as well! Pixel 5a with 765G lasts a lot longer on battery than 4xl with 855!
+101 Reply
Avatar
Nonono February 7, 2022 at 06:45 PM
Only 20% with a 26% larger battery? Looks like 765 is what consumes more battery. Learn some math.
+66 Reply
Avatar
Bro April 23, 2023 at 03:06 PM
Nonono, No. Read that again. He said objectively 855 consumes 20% more with all things equal. So if 765G has 26% more battery then it will last longer than 20% when you have a variable in there that is an advantage for the 765G. Learn how to read.
+16 Reply
Avatar
Soo February 10, 2021 at 08:17 AM
I using sd 855 good experience
+40 Reply