Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 865 Plus vs Snapdragon 750G – what's better?

Snapdragon 865 Plus vs Snapdragon 750G

Snapdragon 865 Plus
VS
Snapdragon 750G
Snapdragon 865 Plus
Snapdragon 750G

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus (with Adreno 650 graphics) and Snapdragon 750G (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
  • Supports 159% higher memory bandwidth (44 against 17 GB/s)
  • Performs 2.5x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 61%) AnTuTu 11 score – 909K vs 566K
  • 41% higher CPU clock speed (3100 vs 2200 MHz)
  • Has 1 MB larger L3 cache size than the Snapdragon 750G
  • Has a smaller size transistor (7 versus 8 nm)
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
  • Higher GPU frequency (~19%)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 865 Plus
vs
Snapdragon 750G

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
CPU 319177 242759
GPU 178154 50920
Memory 143397 92020
UX 268686 180784
Total score 909414 566483
Samples Less than 3 [8 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 152.3 MB/sec 158.2 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 83.3 pages/sec 67.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 107.4 Mpixels/sec 111.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 72.7 images/sec 55.2 images/sec
HDR 103.1 Mpixels/sec 94.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 9.7 images/sec 10.2 images/sec
Photo processing 31.8 images/sec 26.7 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.48 Mpixels/sec 3.76 Mpixels/sec
Samples 4 tests 3 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 5.03 images/sec 5.05 images/sec
Face detection 2.1 images/sec 2.58 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.19 Gpixels/sec 0.14 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.26 Gpixels/sec 0.19 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.14 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 10.4 Gpixels/sec 3.29 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 651.9 FPS 242.4 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 3 tests 3 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 1217 333
Stability 79% -
Graphics test 7 FPS 1 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 10081 7576
Video editing score 5856 6985
Data manipulation score 8690 7680
Photo editing score 30426 19274
Writing score 13869 8986
Phones tested Less than 3 3 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 74 FPS
[Ultra]		 58 FPS
[High]
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Ultra]		 37 FPS
[High]
Fortnite 28 FPS
[Ultra]		 28 FPS
[Medium]
Shadowgun Legends - 61 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 104 FPS
[Ultra]		 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 56 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 60 FPS
[High]		 56 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Asus ROG Phone 3
1080 x 2340		 Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2024-10-01 (Raizel_Ken)Geekbench 6 CPU1263 / 3227
πŸ“˜ 2024-08-11 (Samsung)Geekbench 6 GPU3389
πŸ“˜ 2024-08-11 (Samsung)Geekbench 6 CPU1254 / 3297
πŸ“˜ 2024-07-06 (Yawning Moon)Geekbench 6 GPU3416
πŸ“˜ 2024-07-06 (Yawning Moon)Geekbench 6 CPU923 / 2645
Add View all (5)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-11 (Jason Baker)Geekbench 6 CPU828 / 1875
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-11 (Jason Baker)AnTuTu 11556264
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 (Erick Silva)AnTuTu 11599951
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-28 (Breno)AnTuTu 11614247
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-04 (JΓ£o)AnTuTu 11579715
Add View all (11)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 865 Plus and Snapdragon 750G

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.1 GHz – Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55)		 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 570 Gold (Cortex-A77)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 570 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3100 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.3-A
L1 cache 512 KB -
L2 cache 1 MB -
L3 cache 4 MB 3 MB
Process 7 nanometers 8 nanometers
Transistor count 10.3 billion -
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 5 W
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 650 Adreno 619
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 675 MHz 800 MHz
Pipelines 3 2
Shading units 256 128
Total shaders 768 256
FLOPS 1036.8 Gigaflops 409.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 698 Hexagon 694

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2750 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 44 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP 1x 192MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X55 X52
4G support LTE Cat. 22 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7500 Mbps Up to 3700 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3000 Mbps Up to 1600 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced July 2020 September 2020
Class Flagship Mid range
Model number SM8250-AB SM7225
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
51 (86.4%)
8 (13.6%)
Total votes: 59

Related Comparisons

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (9)
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs MediaTek Helio G99 (2)
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Samsung Exynos 1280 (7)
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (5)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 750G and Snapdragon 865 Plus, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский