Snapdragon 888 vs Kirin 9000S

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (with Adreno 660 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 9000S (Maleoon 910). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 7 nm)
  • Supports 16% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 44 GB/s)
  • 8% higher CPU clock speed (2840 vs 2620 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture
  • Higher GPU frequency (~12%)
  • Shows better (up to 7%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1135K vs 1062K
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 9000S
  • Performs 19% better in floating-point computations

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1135878
1062256
CPU 406119 432016
GPU 233383 115680
Memory 188085 259116
UX 308291 255394
Total score 1135878 1062256
Samples [127 tests] [8 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1500
Multi-Core Score
4118
Asset compression 156.9 MB/sec 172.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 86.4 pages/sec 125.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 104.6 Mpixels/sec 136.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 72.9 images/sec 76.8 images/sec
HDR 104.7 Mpixels/sec 118.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 12.1 images/sec 11.8 images/sec
Photo processing 26.5 images/sec 45.1 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.04 Mpixels/sec 5.15 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 3 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
4509
Background blur 7.75 images/sec 5.02 images/sec
Face detection 3.37 images/sec 2.75 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.28 Gpixels/sec 0.21 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.32 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 13.1 Gpixels/sec 8.24 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 851.2 FPS 311.1 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 19 tests Less than 3

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 505 303
Stability 77% -
Graphics test 4 FPS 2 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 1508 -
Stability 91% -
Graphics test 9 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 12232 -
Video editing score 7638 -
Data manipulation score 10494 -
Photo editing score 29866 -
Writing score 15219 -
Phones tested 11 models -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 83 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Fortnite 26 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Shadowgun Legends 89 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 112 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 58 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 60 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Asus Zenfone 8
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Zha)AnTuTu 12976692
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (Aladdin)AnTuTu 121326171
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 (Aladdin)AnTuTu 121326171
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-02 -> NotezitGeekbench 6 CPU1412 / 3348
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-18 (Soul)AnTuTu 111210861
HiSilicon Kirin 9000S
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-18 (Kirillkas)AnTuTu 111096426
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-03 (ZzZQT x Invincible)AnTuTu 111062256
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-15 -> GuevsaceAnTuTu 11874659
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-14 (-waveTech)AnTuTu 11961938
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-09 (Jerryk)AnTuTu 111033575

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 888 and Kirin 9000S

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
1x 2.62 GHz – TaiShan V120
3x 2.15 GHz – TaiShan V120
4x 1.53 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2840 MHz 2620 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv8-A
L1 cache 512 KB -
L2 cache 1 MB -
L3 cache 4 MB -
Process 5 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count 10.3 billion -
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W 7 W
Manufacturing Samsung SMIC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 660 Maleoon 910
Architecture Adreno 600 Maleoon
GPU frequency 840 MHz 750 MHz
Pipelines 3 4
Shading units 256 256
Total shaders 768 1024
FLOPS 1290.2 Gigaflops 1536 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 780 Da Vinci

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2750 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 44 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP -
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X60 Balong 5000
4G support LTE Cat. 22 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7500 Mbps Up to 4600 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3000 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced December 2020 August 2023
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number SM8350 Hi36A0V120, Hi36A0V120
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 official site -
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
114 (32.5%)
237 (67.5%)
Total votes: 351

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 9000S and Snapdragon 888, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Guest February 2, 2024 at 05:09 AM
The GPU score is low because Geekbench Compute isn't fully compatible with Huawei's own GPU. Based on the 3D Mark scores, the Mali-G78 on the Kirin 910 matches the performance of the Adreno 660 on the Snapdragon 888.
+41 Reply