Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Kirin 9000S

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (with Adreno 740 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 9000S (Maleoon 910). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 7 nm)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 65%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1757K vs 1062K
  • Supports 53% higher memory bandwidth (67.2 against 44 GB/s)
  • Performs 36% better in floating-point computations
  • 22% higher CPU clock speed (3200 vs 2620 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 9000S
  • Higher GPU frequency (~10%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1757044
1062256
CPU 553922 432016
GPU 434880 115680
Memory 311861 259116
UX 456381 255394
Total score 1757044 1062256
Samples [238 tests] [8 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 218.9 MB/sec 172.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 145.2 pages/sec 125.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 168.3 Mpixels/sec 136.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 133 images/sec 76.8 images/sec
HDR 167.2 Mpixels/sec 118.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 18.8 images/sec 11.8 images/sec
Photo processing 34.5 images/sec 45.1 images/sec
Ray tracing 5.78 Mpixels/sec 5.15 Mpixels/sec
Samples 132 tests 3 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 12.3 images/sec 5.02 images/sec
Face detection 5.1 images/sec 2.75 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.53 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.56 Gpixels/sec 0.21 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.36 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.12 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 32.6 Gpixels/sec 8.24 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 2177.4 FPS 311.1 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 66 tests Less than 3

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 1092 303
Stability 67% -
Graphics test 8 FPS 2 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 5312 -
Stability 67% -
Graphics test 20 FPS -
Section 1 23 FPS -
Section 2 20 FPS -
Section 3 17 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 3667 -
Stability 45% -
Graphics test 21 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 13957 -
Video editing score 7265 -
Data manipulation score 14272 -
Photo editing score 32179 -
Writing score 17828 -
Phones tested 9 models -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 90 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Fortnite 56 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Shadowgun Legends 118 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 120 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 59 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 59 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro
1116 x 2480
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 -> Saad_irqAnTuTu 121959121
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 -> sento raitoAnTuTu 122035354
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (bySK1LL)AnTuTu 121974839
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Babababi)AnTuTu 121953931
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 -> RennsportCPU Throttle80%
HiSilicon Kirin 9000S
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-18 (Kirillkas)AnTuTu 111096426
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-03 (ZzZQT x Invincible)AnTuTu 111062256
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-15 -> GuevsaceAnTuTu 11874659
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-14 (-waveTech)AnTuTu 11961938
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-09 (Jerryk)AnTuTu 111033575

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and Kirin 9000S

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X3
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A710
3x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
1x 2.62 GHz – TaiShan V120
3x 2.15 GHz – TaiShan V120
4x 1.53 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3200 MHz 2620 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8-A
L2 cache 1 MB -
L3 cache 8 MB -
Process 4 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count 16 billion -
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8.5 W 7 W
Manufacturing TSMC SMIC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 740 Maleoon 910
Architecture Adreno 700 Maleoon
GPU frequency 680 MHz 750 MHz
Pipelines 3 4
Shading units 512 256
Total shaders 1536 1024
FLOPS 2089 Gigaflops 1536 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Da Vinci

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 4200 MHz 2750 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 67.2 Gb/s 44 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP -
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X70 Balong 5000
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 10000 Mbps Up to 4600 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3500 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced November 2022 August 2023
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number SM8550-AB Hi36A0V120, Hi36A0V120
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 official site -
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 -
Further details
Notes on Snapdragon 8 Gen 2:
    - There's also the "Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy," which only differs by having a 160 MHz higher CPU clock and a 39 MHz higher GPU clock, resulting in 2208.8 GFLOPS for the GPU. Generally, you won't notice this difference in real-life usage, including games.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
259 (64%)
146 (36%)
Total votes: 405

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 9000S and Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Dox July 26, 2024 at 02:15 PM
Who are those 105 people that really voted kirin is better
+6 Reply
Avatar
John Wiederecht September 30, 2023 at 03:15 PM
The Kirin 9000s is a 2019 chip in 2023. Well, an underclocked 2019 chip.
+67 Reply