Exynos 1280 vs Dimensity 7025

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1280 (with Mali-G68 MP4 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (IMG BXM-8-256). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1280
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 6 nm)
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  • Supports 51% higher memory bandwidth (25.6 against 17 GB/s)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~6%)
  • Shows better (up to 9%) AnTuTu 11 score – 668K vs 615K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
615425
668462
CPU 256114 262953
GPU 71758 60217
Memory 95251 141219
UX 192302 204073
Total score 615425 668462
Samples [56 tests] [30 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
2321
Asset compression 102.4 MB/sec 122.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 52.1 pages/sec 64.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 71.3 Mpixels/sec 95.3 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 37 images/sec 47.9 images/sec
HDR 68.7 Mpixels/sec 77.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 6.2 images/sec 7.74 images/sec
Photo processing 16.9 images/sec 24.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.15 Mpixels/sec 3.36 Mpixels/sec
Samples 37 tests 10 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 1280 +1523%
2321
Background blur 3.25 images/sec 1.13 images/sec
Face detection 1.62 images/sec 0.61 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.1 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.01 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 7 Gpixels/sec 1.95 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 408.3 FPS 195 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 18 tests 4 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 226 -
Stability 95% -
Graphics test 2 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 628 -
Stability 99% -
Graphics test 3 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
11719
12296
Web score 9628 14361
Video editing score 7350 5525
Data manipulation score 8838 10873
Photo editing score 22696 23703
Writing score 13552 15057
Phones tested 3 models 5 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1280
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-16 -> SacredGold14GeekBench CPU856 / 2016
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-09 (Adi)AnTuTu598004
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-14 (DJ)AnTuTu651423
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-15 (OmPhanLaoRaBien)AnTuTu637428
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-11 (Pikolano)AnTuTu690864
MediaTek Dimensity 7025
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (WillowWilson78)AnTuTu659483
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (Dud)AnTuTu658200
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (Dud)AnTuTu635368
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-23 (MABS)AnTuTu630214
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-26 (Yoi)AnTuTu604873

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1280 and Dimensity 7025

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2500 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 5 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W -
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G68 MP4 IMG BXM-8-256
Architecture Valhall 2nd gen PowerVR IMG GPU
GPU frequency 897 MHz 950 MHz
Pipelines 4 8
Shading units 32 16
Total shaders 128 128
FLOPS 229.6 Gigaflops 243.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
DirectX version - 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek NPU 550
NPU theoretical performance 4.3 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2550 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced March 2022 April 2024
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number S5E8825 (MT6855V/ATZA, MT6855V_A/ATZA
Official page Samsung Exynos 1280 official site MediaTek Dimensity 7025 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 1580 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
68 (39.1%)
106 (60.9%)
Total votes: 174

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 7025 and Exynos 1280, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Redmi note 14 5g November 13, 2025 at 10:48 AM
Now details this phone
0 Reply