Samsung Exynos 1280

Samsung Exynos 1280
  • GPU: Mali-G68 MP4
  • Cores: 8
  • Clock: 2400 MHz
Samsung Exynos 1280 – an 8-core chipset that was announced on March 17, 2022, and is manufactured using a 5-nanometer process technology. It has 2 cores Cortex-A78 at 2400 MHz and 6 cores Cortex-A55 at 2000 MHz.

Review

CPU Performance
29
Gaming Performance
9
Battery life
84
NanoReview Score
32
Compare Samsung Exynos 1280 with other SoCs

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Samsung Exynos 1280
615425
CPU 256114
GPU 71758
Memory 95251
UX 192302
Total score 615425

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
956
Multi-Core Score
2082
Asset compression 102.4 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 52.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 71.3 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 37 images/sec
HDR 68.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 6.2 images/sec
Photo processing 16.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.15 Mpixels/sec
Samples 37 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
2321
Background blur 3.25 images/sec
Face detection 1.62 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.1 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.11 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 7 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 408.3 FPS
API OpenCL
Samples 18 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
226
Score 226
Stability 95%
Graphics test 2 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
628
Score 628
Stability 99%
Graphics test 3 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
11719
Web score 9628
Video editing score 7350
Data manipulation score 8838
Photo editing score 22696
Writing score 13552
Phones tested 3 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (eimakill)AnTuTu 12709508
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-16 -> SacredGold14Geekbench 6 CPU856 / 2016
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-09 (Adi)AnTuTu 11598004
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-14 (DJ)AnTuTu 11651423
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-15 (OmPhanLaoRaBien)AnTuTu 11637428
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-11 (Pikolano)AnTuTu 11690864
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-02 (MusteryLodall)Geekbench 6 CPU936 / 2053
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-02 (MusteryLodall)AnTuTu 11605286

Smartphones

Click on the device name to view detailed information
Phones with Exynos 1280AnTuTu v11
1. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G621907
2. Samsung Galaxy A25617315
3. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G615425
4. Samsung Galaxy M34 5G603449
5. Samsung Galaxy M33 5G598004

Specifications

Detailed specifications of the Exynos 1280 SoC with Mali-G68 MP4 graphics

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8
Frequency 2400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A
Process 5 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G68 MP4
Architecture Valhall 2nd gen
GPU frequency 897 MHz
Pipelines 4
Shading units 32
Total shaders 128
FLOPS 229.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes
NPU theoretical performance 4.3 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes
Download speed Up to 2550 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced March 2022
Class Mid range
Model number S5E8825
Official page Samsung Exynos 1280 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 1580

Comments

🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Nobori Takashi August 28, 2025 at 12:58 AM
Jasa niratabi karona. -> Samsung M34. hahaha.
0 Reply
Avatar
Take Care August 25, 2025 at 01:31 PM
RAM bandwidth 17Gbs... UFS 2.2... slow, slow.
0 Reply
Avatar
Somebody June 15, 2025 at 05:53 PM
Latin American Galaxy A26 still uses this CPU, while the worldwide model is on the 1380. Shame on Samsung for disadvantaging an entire region for no reason.
+20 Reply
Avatar
Joe April 17, 2025 at 08:45 AM
Memory Bus 4x 16 Bit -> 2x 16 Bit
0 Reply
Serhii April 17, 2025 at 09:21 AM
Appreciate your hard work.
+5 Reply
Avatar
Joe April 16, 2025 at 10:15 PM
GPU frequency 972 -> 897 MHz Total shaders 160 -> 128 FLOPS 487 -> 229.6 Gigaflops
+1 Reply
Avatar
Jack November 21, 2024 at 06:16 PM
Please change the loading speed from 1840 to 1280.https://semiconductor.samsung.com/processor/mobile-processor/exynos-1280/
+3 Reply
Serhii November 22, 2024 at 08:08 AM
Thank you for an info.
+5 Reply
Avatar
Hikols June 24, 2024 at 10:46 PM
Nanoreview team can you update the scores for this chipset? It seems like everyday they're lowering the total score of this chipset despite users posting higher scores like up to 480k-490k in Antutu and 900/2000 for Geekbench 6, but despite that, right now it's behind the Snapdragon 765G, 695 and 4 Gen 2 when the Exynos 1280 has similar or better CPU but much better GPU
+59 Reply
Avatar
Yeah yeah... July 30, 2024 at 06:26 PM
Exynos 1280 sucks. Stop kissing Samsung's ass.
+37 Reply
Avatar
But August 8, 2024 at 12:51 AM
Yeah yeah..., My A53 is still working fine and strangely smoother than at the time I bought it (maybe it got more optimized) after more than 2 years of use and the battery can still give 6-8h of screen on time.
+52 Reply
Avatar
Nightshot February 23, 2024 at 04:41 PM
GPU frequency is precisely 972MHz. Not 1000MHz.
+26 Reply
Serhii February 28, 2024 at 06:15 PM
Thank you for a comment.
+3 Reply
Avatar
Gabriel2392 October 16, 2024 at 12:40 PM
It's 897MHz actually.
+2 Reply
Avatar
BK05 January 19, 2024 at 07:45 PM
After the Android 14 update, my Samsung A53 is significantly smoother and fasterβ€”I'm genuinely impressed! I definitely think it's better now than it was with versions 12 or 13.
+54 Reply
Avatar
Lina December 10, 2023 at 08:12 PM
Correction: The GPU AnTuTu's score should be more than 125,000 not just 100,000
+49 Reply
Avatar
Son November 17, 2023 at 10:25 AM
I dislike the way people thoughtlessly insult Exynos chipsets for no apparent reason. The entire Snapdragon 800 series seems to be more prone to overheating than their equivalent Exynos or MediaTek chipsets. Likely, that's why MediaTek is now currently leading the field, both in terms of business and public preference.
+49 Reply
Avatar
Father December 2, 2023 at 03:04 AM
Firstly, MTK is not leading in any segment whatsoever. Secondly, Snapdragon may heat up, but this is because it delivers high performance. Any high performing phone will generate heat and may eventually overheat, at which point it will throttle. Exynos, on the other hand, heats up without even providing comparable performance. Leaving games aside, it will heat up and lag even during simple day-to-day tasks. Please avoid talking about things you have limited knowledge of.
+26 Reply
Avatar
Mother December 6, 2023 at 12:23 PM
Father, Your response suggests that you have limited knowledge beyond the Exynos 990, 2100, and 2200. Exynos chips are generally good and do not have overheating issues. People, however, seem to harbor an unjustified dislike towards them. I've often heard arguments stating that an SD730G is superior to the Exynos 1280 or 1380 merely because 'Exynos are bad and Snapdragon are good.' This, however, is a blatant misconception, as it is clear that the SD730G comes up short in every aspect, including efficiency.
+58 Reply
Avatar
Julie December 30, 2023 at 07:52 PM
Father, Can someone explain why my A53 generates less heat while performing better than my brother's A71 with a Snapdragon 730 chipset in games like WoT Blitz, Genshin Impact, and others? For reference, he uses an A71 with 8GB of RAM, while I'm on an A53 with 6GB of RAM.
+48 Reply
Avatar
Stepson March 26, 2024 at 09:58 AM
Mother, From my point of view, you are both right with some of your arguments. What cannot be overlooked, however, is that the European versions of Samsung's Galaxy S devices with Exynos chipsets (especially the Galaxy S22 with the Exynos 2200) have a much shorter battery life than the direct US models with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SoC. Most users may not be interested in any benchmark result, but when it comes to battery life, everyone pricks up their ears as it directly affects every user. It should be noted here that Samsung seems to have caught up with the Exynos 2400 in terms of efficiency compared to older high-end Exynos chipsets from the past.
+3 Reply
Avatar
Kevin April 27, 2024 at 07:53 PM
Stepson, Both versions of the S22 have poor battery life. The Snapdragon model does perform slightly worse than the Exynos, but this comes at the expense of somewhat less throttling. You might think that the Snapdragon is superior because you see fewer complaints about it, but that's only because it's only available in the USA, unlike the Exynos version which is sold worldwide. Naturally, with a larger customer base, there will be more complaints.
+7 Reply
Avatar
Somebody June 15, 2025 at 05:56 PM
Julie, Generational improvements: 2 years passed, and everything got better, smaller nanometer size, perhaps faster RAM interface, and possibly the XDNA GPU architecture etc. etc. Exynos is inefficient, but every new generation is still more powerful than the previous, making steady improvements.
0 Reply
Avatar
Bob October 3, 2023 at 12:01 PM
My A33 5G scored 491003 in AnTuTu and 943/2077 in Geekbench but I can't send the scores to the Nanoreview team because when I send the score I get an error message!
+83 Reply
Avatar
Mohamed November 29, 2023 at 09:30 PM
Yes, NanoReview is posting low benchmark numbers, making the chip appear subpar. It's perplexing how the Snapdragon 695 could be superior to the Exynos 1280. Both are essentially tied in terms of CPU performance. However, when it comes to GPU performance, the Exynos 1280 is nearly twice as good, as indicated by the 3DMark scores.
+40 Reply
Avatar
Pawan August 19, 2023 at 08:54 AM
Will it be capable of handling 4 years of Android updates claimed by Samsung or is it just another marketing gimmick?
+63 Reply
Avatar
TechyPuff August 20, 2023 at 11:11 AM
No, most probably it can't handle 4 yrs of updates. It can't even do multitasking efficiently and heats a lot too.
+12 Reply
Avatar
Carl August 23, 2023 at 12:24 PM
TechyPuff, "I don't experience much heating, except when playing resource-intensive games. And frankly, any other chip would heat up in similar circumstances. I've noticed many people raise concerns about overheating during heavy gaming, but this is to be expected. It's reminiscent of the complaints about the S21 Exynos version overheating when, in fact, the Snapdragon version also tends to get warm. Just because it's a Snapdragon doesn't mean it won't heat up. Currently, Android 13 paired with One UI 5.1 runs seamlessly on the A53. For those unfamiliar, the A53 has seen significant optimization through updates, performing much better now than at its launch. I believe both the A33 and A53 are equipped to handle 4 years of updates, especially since newer Android versions, like Android 14, introduce fewer changes compared to their predecessors, such as Android 13.
+143 Reply
Avatar
Franz September 26, 2023 at 02:19 AM
Carl, Exactly, I just don't understand why people say it's laggy or overheats when it runs smoothly for me and it only gets hot when I play Genshin Impact but there isn't a single phone that isn't a gamer that doesn't get hot in Genshin Impact Surely most people don't even try the phone and just hate it because it uses an Exynos chip.
+102 Reply
Avatar
Murat November 15, 2023 at 01:57 AM
If you take proper care of it, I'm sure it'll last for at least 4 years. I've been using my M30s, which has a much weaker processor, for all these years and it still works fine. I mainly use it now as a backup for my A33. Moreover, if it doesn't last 4 years, it's not as if it was overly expensive, so you can always buy a new one.
+48 Reply
Avatar
Emad July 27, 2023 at 05:34 AM
This should be updated because that was before the optimization.
+113 Reply