Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Exynos 1330 vs Dimensity 6300 – what's better?

Exynos 1330 vs Dimensity 6300

Exynos 1330
VS
Dimensity 6300
Exynos 1330
Dimensity 6300

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1330 (with Mali-G68 MP2 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 6300 (Mali-G57 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Specs
  7. Comments (6)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1330
  • Supports 51% higher memory bandwidth (25.6 against 17 GB/s)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 6 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 15%) AnTuTu 11 score – 607K vs 528K
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 6300
  • Higher GPU frequency (~13%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Exynos 1330
vs
Dimensity 6300

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Exynos 1330 +15%
607489
Dimensity 6300
528398
CPU 274218 224355
GPU 42656 45549
Memory 107262 104424
UX 183353 154070
Total score 607489 528398
Samples [25 tests] [46 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Exynos 1330
1826
Dimensity 6300 +8%
1980
Asset compression 107 MB/sec 100.4 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 59.9 pages/sec 48.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 65.3 Mpixels/sec 70.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 41 images/sec 38.3 images/sec
HDR 57.2 Mpixels/sec 62.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 6.33 images/sec 5.73 images/sec
Photo processing 10.6 images/sec 19.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.43 Mpixels/sec 2.92 Mpixels/sec
Samples 10 tests 23 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 1330
1286
Dimensity 6300 +10%
1414
Background blur 1.94 images/sec 2.03 images/sec
Face detection 0.95 images/sec 0.96 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.1 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 3.73 Gpixels/sec 4.05 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 221.7 FPS 243.8 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 3 tests 18 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 139 151
Stability 97% 98%
Graphics test 1 FPS 1 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 364 -
Stability 97% -
Graphics test 2 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Exynos 1330 +15%
11711
Dimensity 6300
10205
Web score 10836 11337
Video editing score 6753 5070
Data manipulation score 9036 7132
Photo editing score 20957 25038
Writing score 16436 11440
Phones tested 3 models 12 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1330
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 (IhaveName)AnTuTu 12341823
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 (ACIMASIZ)AnTuTu 12706733
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 (Đỗ Đông Điền)AnTuTu 11632633
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 (Tom Pearl)AnTuTu 12754245
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-29 (Điền)AnTuTu 11516874
Add View all (34)
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-06 (Galaxy A06 5G)AnTuTu 12624233
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (Gremmar)AnTuTu 12643666
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-29 (Gremmar)AnTuTu 12630572
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (JJ)AnTuTu 12529486
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (JJ)Geekbench 7 CPU650 / 1924
Add View all (43)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1330 and Dimensity 6300

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55		 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache - 2 MB
Process 5 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W -
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G68 MP2 Mali-G57 MP2
Architecture Valhall 2nd gen Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 949 MHz 1072 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 32 32
Total shaders 64 64
FLOPS 121.5 Gigaflops 137.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version - 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
NPU theoretical performance 4.9 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8		 - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 18 -
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2550 Mbps Up to 3300 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced February 2023 April 2024
Class Low end Mid range
Model number S5E8535 MT6835, MT6835T, MT6835V/TZB
Official page Samsung Exynos 1330 official site MediaTek Dimensity 6300 official site
Successor - - MediaTek Dimensity 6400

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
623 (66.3%)
317 (33.7%)
Total votes: 940

Related Comparisons

1. MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (1)
2. MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
3. MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4)
4. MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (9)
5. MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus (10)
6. MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (10)
7. MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
8. Samsung Exynos 1330 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (3)
9. Samsung Exynos 1330 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
10. Samsung Exynos 1330 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus (6)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 6300 and Exynos 1330, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Jack June 18, 2026 at 03:24 PM
Exynos 1330 is good in performance (Gaming) but also gets heat while using 5g network for downloading
+6 Reply
Avatar
Mrutyunjaya December 10, 2025 at 03:20 PM
From my side dimensity 6300 is best
+20 Reply
Avatar
Phone user December 2, 2025 at 08:07 AM
Why does exynos 1330 higher antutu score than dimensity 6300?
+54 Reply
Avatar
pig shit November 2, 2025 at 06:11 PM
exynos 1330 is better, but I want to say "I am very handsome"
+13 Reply
Avatar
SOC master March 4, 2025 at 12:01 PM
Exynos 1330 is better in theory , but in practical it is very bad in terms of network performance . It heats up quickly in 5g usage in low network coverage area . It is little bit of powerful than the dimensity 6300 but you can't use the power in gaming or other cases . D6300 gives very constant performance , that's why samsung chose d6300 over Exynos 1330 .
+75 Reply
Avatar
Logic March 7, 2025 at 06:56 AM
You are right , Like Snapdragon Mediatech also provide good network modem, and first time samsung use a chip that made by TSMC , while others Snapdragon Chips which are used in budget or mid-range samsung devices are made by samsung itself .
+54 Reply
EnglishРусский