Exynos 1480 vs Tensor G3

We compared the 8-core Samsung Exynos 1480 (Samsung Xclipse 530) with the older 9-core Google Tensor G3 (Mali-G715 MP7) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1480
  • Higher GPU frequency (~46%)
Pros of Google Tensor G3
  • Supports 166% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 25.6 GB/s)
  • Performs 2.4x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows better (up to 38%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1409K vs 1021K
  • Has 1 more cores
  • 6% higher CPU clock speed (2910 vs 2750 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1021736
Tensor G3 +38%
1409016
CPU 348485 482403
GPU 226076 384611
Memory 182794 218603
UX 264381 323399
Total score 1021736 1409016
Samples [38 tests] [33 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Tensor G3 +51%
1722
Multi-Core Score
Tensor G3 +30%
4458
Asset compression 174.3 MB/sec 197.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 84.2 pages/sec 134.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 127.9 Mpixels/sec 148.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 65.6 images/sec 82.1 images/sec
HDR 109.3 Mpixels/sec 142.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 12.5 images/sec 13.2 images/sec
Photo processing 31.3 images/sec 48.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 5.04 Mpixels/sec 5.34 Mpixels/sec
Samples 19 tests 11 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Tensor G3 +97%
8076
Background blur 7.73 images/sec 10.6 images/sec
Face detection 3.62 images/sec 6.85 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.16 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.24 Gpixels/sec 0.35 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.32 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.05 Gpixels/sec 0.08 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 16.2 Gpixels/sec 11.9 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 426.8 FPS 1088 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 11 tests 9 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Tensor G3 +114%
982
Score 459 982
Stability 98% 74%
Graphics test 3 FPS 7 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 982 -
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 5 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 11788 -
Video editing score 7255 -
Data manipulation score 10941 -
Photo editing score 23283 -
Writing score 17673 -
Phones tested Less than 3 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1480
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 -> SKLeoAnTuTu1062044
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (No)AnTuTu965699
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (Brice)GeekBench CPU1115 / 3126
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-06 (Mazen)AnTuTu1057022
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-30 (X24ROMIRP)AnTuTu976232
Google Tensor G3
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-28 (asfiii-malik)AnTuTu1515235
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-28 (asfiii-baloch)AnTuTu1515235
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-05 (s1mpick)AnTuTu1338293
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-04 (reazz)AnTuTu1356451
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-04 (Bilal Ahmed)AnTuTu1367231

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1480 and Tensor G3

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.75 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X3
4x 2.37 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 9
Frequency 2750 MHz 2910 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
L3 cache 4 MB -
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 530 Mali-G715 MP7
Architecture RDNA 2 Valhall 4th gen
GPU frequency 1300 MHz 890 MHz
Pipelines 1 7
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 128 896
FLOPS 665.6 Gigaflops 1594.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Exynos 5300i
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5100 Mbps Up to 7300 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps Up to 3700 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 7
Bluetooth 5.3 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced March 2024 October 2023
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number S5E8845 GS301 (S5P9865)
Official page Samsung Exynos 1480 official site Google Tensor G3 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 1580 - Google Tensor G5

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
18 (20.7%)
69 (79.3%)
Total votes: 87

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Tensor G3 and Exynos 1480, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!