Exynos 1480 vs Snapdragon 855

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1480 (with Samsung Xclipse 530 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (Adreno 640). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1480
  • Higher GPU frequency (~2.2x)
  • Has 2 MB larger L3 cache size than the Snapdragon 855
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 7 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 24%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1021K vs 824K
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  • Performs 35% better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 33% higher memory bandwidth (34.13 against 25.6 GB/s)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1021736
CPU 348485 314517
GPU 226076 125449
Memory 182794 150134
UX 264381 234413
Total score 1021736 824513
Samples [38 tests] [39 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1137
Multi-Core Score
3437
Asset compression 174.3 MB/sec 126.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 84.2 pages/sec 74.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 127.9 Mpixels/sec 88 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 65.6 images/sec 57.7 images/sec
HDR 109.3 Mpixels/sec 89.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 12.5 images/sec 9.07 images/sec
Photo processing 31.3 images/sec 20.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 5.04 Mpixels/sec 4.06 Mpixels/sec
Samples 19 tests 29 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
4101
Background blur 7.73 images/sec 4.31 images/sec
Face detection 3.62 images/sec 1.84 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.16 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.24 Gpixels/sec 0.22 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.05 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 16.2 Gpixels/sec 8.72 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 426.8 FPS 444 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 11 tests 19 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 459 -
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 3 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 982 876
Stability 98% 86%
Graphics test 5 FPS 5 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
13134
Web score 11788 8813
Video editing score 7255 5956
Data manipulation score 10941 8239
Photo editing score 23283 22485
Writing score 17673 13084
Phones tested Less than 3 8 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 58 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 56 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 28 FPS
[Ultra]
Shadowgun Legends - 51 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz - 59 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 57 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
1080 x 2340
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1480
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-26 (RJ)AnTuTu 121159493
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-24 (Centikak1)AnTuTu 121210731
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-20 (F)AnTuTu 121135229
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-17 (АртСм)AnTuTu 111080442
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 -> SKLeoAnTuTu 111062044
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-12 (Zakazaka1273)AnTuTu 11855696
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (Pon)AnTuTu 121038764
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Stanley)AnTuTu 12969794
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Stanley)AnTuTu 11847934
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (pakasraka)AnTuTu 11763477

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1480 and Snapdragon 855

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.75 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 2.84 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)
3x 2.42 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2750 MHz 2840 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache 4 MB 2 MB
Process 4 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count - 6.7 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 530 Adreno 640
Architecture RDNA 2 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 1300 MHz 585 MHz
Pipelines 1 3
Shading units 128 256
Total shaders 128 768
FLOPS 665.6 Gigaflops 898.5 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 690

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 34.13 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 UFS 3.0
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - X24 LTE, X50 5G
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 20
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5100 Mbps Up to 5000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps Up to 1240 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS

Info

Announced March 2024 December 2018
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number S5E8845 SM8150
Official page Samsung Exynos 1480 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 1680 - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
144 (67.3%)
70 (32.7%)
Total votes: 214

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 855 and Exynos 1480, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
C0W November 15, 2024 at 02:18 PM
Snapdragon 865 has more raw power.
+1 Reply
Avatar
David December 31, 2024 at 03:23 PM
I'm so done with 4g processors, 855, 865, it's overheat like crazy. Time to move on to 5g processors with more capable GPU and better architecture. 4 time 2.7 GHz Cortex a78 vs a single big core Cortex a76 is no contest. Newer processors are mostly better optimized. Plus this one has different Gpu Xclipse from AMD. No Mali Club.
+3 Reply
Avatar
Md. Al Hasan Sami July 8, 2024 at 03:52 PM
Though SD 855 5 years old processor, but still it shows better performance than exynos 1480. Exynos 1480 is far behind SD 865 processor.. Snapdragon is the best..
+17 Reply
Avatar
Nilly July 15, 2024 at 02:44 PM
Far behind??? 1480 is better than sd 865 . Less heat and better battery than 865
+16 Reply
Avatar
KauΓ§uk September 23, 2024 at 11:10 AM
You make it sound like 1480 was meant to be a flagship chip which is quite silly. As an overall experience in battery health, heat management this should perform better due to modern architecture.
+12 Reply
Avatar
David December 31, 2024 at 03:19 PM
Raw performance won't matter if it gets hot fast it's gonna throttle and cost more battery life.
0 Reply