Exynos 1480 vs Snapdragon 865

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1480 (with Samsung Xclipse 530 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (Adreno 650). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1480
  • Higher GPU frequency (~2.2x)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 7 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 4%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1021K vs 978K
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  • Supports 72% higher memory bandwidth (44 against 25.6 GB/s)
  • Performs 35% better in floating-point computations

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1021736
CPU 348485 385127
GPU 226076 148169
Memory 182794 166070
UX 264381 279544
Total score 1021736 978910
Samples [38 tests] [104 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1169
Multi-Core Score
3437
Asset compression 174.3 MB/sec 149.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 84.2 pages/sec 87.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 127.9 Mpixels/sec 125.3 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 65.6 images/sec 77 images/sec
HDR 109.3 Mpixels/sec 106.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 12.5 images/sec 11 images/sec
Photo processing 31.3 images/sec 32.7 images/sec
Ray tracing 5.04 Mpixels/sec 4.29 Mpixels/sec
Samples 19 tests 52 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
4131
Background blur 7.73 images/sec 4.53 images/sec
Face detection 3.62 images/sec 1.97 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.17 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.24 Gpixels/sec 0.22 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.18 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.05 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 16.2 Gpixels/sec 9.05 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 426.8 FPS 567.3 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 11 tests 34 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 459 -
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 3 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
1110
Score 982 1110
Stability 98% 99%
Graphics test 5 FPS 6 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
13134
Web score 11788 9557
Video editing score 7255 5874
Data manipulation score 10941 8658
Photo editing score 23283 29642
Writing score 17673 14782
Phones tested Less than 3 14 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 61 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 30 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 59 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
1080 x 2340
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1480
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-17 (АртСм)AnTuTu1080442
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 -> SKLeoAnTuTu1062044
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (No)AnTuTu965699
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (Brice)GeekBench CPU1115 / 3126
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-06 (Mazen)AnTuTu1057022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-20 (mptech)AnTuTu973656
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-31 (GameFabuloso16)AnTuTu1010010
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 -> RennsportAnTuTu1066668
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-09 (May)AnTuTu745543
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-03 -> penguin_1234GeekBench GPU3056

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1480 and Snapdragon 865

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.75 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2750 MHz 2840 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
Process 4 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count - 10.3 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 5 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 530 Adreno 650
Architecture RDNA 2 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 1300 MHz 587 MHz
Pipelines 1 3
Shading units 128 256
Total shaders 128 768
FLOPS 665.6 Gigaflops 901.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 698

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2750 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 44 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - X55
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 22
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5100 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps Up to 3000 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced March 2024 December 2019
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number S5E8845 SM8250-AB
Official page Samsung Exynos 1480 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 1580 - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
411 (43.1%)
542 (56.9%)
Total votes: 953

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 865 and Exynos 1480, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Hah July 10, 2026 at 04:58 PM
Unfortunately, this is true, so don't be mistaken)
0 Reply
Avatar
Verskil November 15, 2024 at 06:05 PM
I just wanna ask why is the Gflops for the 1480 so low?, and what does it affect on a phone? E.g. (Video playback/streaming, Game smoothness,etc...)
+64 Reply
Avatar
Ima May 10, 2024 at 10:08 AM
After five years, finally, a mid-range can be compared to a flagship.
+65 Reply
Avatar
Mrsch June 18, 2024 at 10:01 AM
True, true. The 1480 seems more power-efficient, though.
+35 Reply
Avatar
Nilly July 2, 2024 at 01:06 PM
1480 is better and heats less too
+38 Reply
Avatar
Gabriel December 4, 2024 at 06:16 PM
Nilly, It isn't don't be delusional
+11 Reply