Snapdragon 870 vs Snapdragon 865

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 (with Adreno 650 graphics) and Snapdragon 865 (Adreno 650). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
  • 13% higher CPU clock speed (3200 vs 2840 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~14%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1010069
CPU 378231 385127
GPU 155526 148169
Memory 174975 166070
UX 301337 279544
Total score 1010069 978910
Samples [102 tests] [104 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 160.2 MB/sec 149.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 86.7 pages/sec 87.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 116.8 Mpixels/sec 125.3 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 80 images/sec 77 images/sec
HDR 108 Mpixels/sec 106.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 12 images/sec 11 images/sec
Photo processing 33.5 images/sec 32.7 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.41 Mpixels/sec 4.29 Mpixels/sec
Samples 34 tests 52 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 5.01 images/sec 4.53 images/sec
Face detection 2.04 images/sec 1.97 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.19 Gpixels/sec 0.17 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.26 Gpixels/sec 0.22 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.21 Gpixels/sec 0.18 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 10.3 Gpixels/sec 9.05 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 650.5 FPS 567.3 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 18 tests 34 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 1224 1110
Stability 99% 99%
Graphics test 7 FPS 6 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
12227
Web score 11701 9557
Video editing score 5825 5874
Data manipulation score 9987 8658
Photo editing score 28690 29642
Writing score 15274 14782
Phones tested 2 models 14 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 88 FPS
[Ultra]
60 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile 59 FPS
[Ultra]
61 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite 27 FPS
[Ultra]
30 FPS
[Ultra]
Shadowgun Legends 102 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 107 FPS
[Ultra]
60 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 49 FPS
[Ultra]
60 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 60 FPS
[Ultra]
59 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Black Shark 4
1080 x 2400
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
1080 x 2340
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 -> AzuNoBelAnTuTu 121251812
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Ambarukmo_id)AnTuTu 121182612
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 -> sbx.777AnTuTu 121143560
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (alvyan)AnTuTu 121096940
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-03 (DisnaroπŸ‡§πŸ‡·)AnTuTu 111029687
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-22 (mptech)AnTuTu 11995050
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-20 (mptech)AnTuTu 11973656
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-18 (heedneas)AnTuTu 121160558
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-18 (Baz38)AnTuTu 121001992
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-17 (heedneas)AnTuTu 121160558

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 870 and Snapdragon 865

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.2 GHz – Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55)
1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3200 MHz 2840 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 512 KB 512 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
Process 7 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count 10.3 billion 10.3 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 5 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 650 Adreno 650
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 670 MHz 587 MHz
Pipelines 3 3
Shading units 256 256
Total shaders 768 768
FLOPS 1029.1 Gigaflops 901.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 698 Hexagon 698

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 2750 MHz 2750 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 44 Gb/s 44 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X55 X55
4G support LTE Cat. 22 LTE Cat. 22
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7500 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3000 Mbps Up to 3000 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced January 2021 December 2019
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number SM8250-AC SM8250-AB
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 official site
Successor - - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
6161 (70.4%)
2588 (29.6%)
Total votes: 8749

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 865 and Snapdragon 870, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
soulx1 January 15, 2025 at 09:08 PM
as a 870 user the only drawback was unable to oc the gpu
+5 Reply
Avatar
Neko July 9, 2022 at 02:52 PM
why on SD 870, fps in genshin is being held?
+99 Reply
Avatar
Abstronal September 3, 2022 at 07:05 AM
Not sure, maybe at its release it wasn't fully optimized due to late software updates, but I've played genshin impact at 60 fps on my ft neo 2 reaching only 43-41 degrees.
+69 Reply
Avatar
rhs May 10, 2022 at 10:24 AM
Why does 870 has faster internet when the modem is exactly the same as 865?
+92 Reply
Avatar
Sergey May 10, 2022 at 01:23 PM
It is a mistake, both support LTE up to 2500 Mbps.
+15 Reply
Avatar
Arash May 25, 2022 at 09:58 AM
The modem alone is not effective, but the CPU speed is also effective in this case.
+13 Reply
Avatar
Difference May 5, 2025 at 03:15 PM
Because the sd 870 is over clock version sd 865
0 Reply
Avatar
oleg October 2, 2021 at 10:18 AM
865 don't have those overheating problems like 888 snap and 870, its bs!
+158 Reply
Avatar
KD6-3.7 November 30, 2021 at 11:21 AM
870 doesn't have a heating problem. lol
+281 Reply
Avatar
Fadi May 2, 2021 at 07:45 AM
How is the cpu of sd870 has more cpu clock speed (3.2ghz) than SD865 cpu clock speed (2.84) and still scores less cpu points (179347) than SD865 with (182344) ? And how is the gpu score of SD870 is much higher than SD865 by alot ( about 49000 gpu point higher) even tho the specs are nearly identical?
+179 Reply
Avatar
Z3NXY July 6, 2021 at 11:03 AM
good question , in my opinion the answer is the cpu usage , 3.2ghz is too high with common tasks , so the cpu is not running at full speed while you use it , it just full speed when you active new task like open new app
+40 Reply
Avatar
Jeremy November 25, 2021 at 06:48 AM
Because the GPU has a significantly higher clock speed in the 870. The CPU speed is only faster on one of the cores.
+9 Reply
Avatar
Pbb February 10, 2022 at 07:24 AM
Jeremy, Gflops is higher too in 870
0 Reply
Avatar
Leaker March 11, 2022 at 06:17 AM
Because GPU frequency of SD 870 is higher than SD 860
0 Reply
Avatar
Eheh July 5, 2022 at 03:58 PM
L1 cache is lesser in 870
+1 Reply
Avatar
Snappy Man September 29, 2024 at 10:34 PM
Eheh, Are you sure the L1 cache is less on the Snapdragon 870?. Cuz that wouldn't be good on the GPU. the GPU needs more cache for the graphics to run faster and harder than last time. 😁
0 Reply
Avatar
Random_Paki March 24, 2021 at 02:12 AM
The Poco F3 (Redmi K40 for Chinese market) will be a game changer for a lot of people living in developing countries who are tech savvy and power users. The SD 870 is an excellent chipset for gaming, plus it is capable enough to make your device future proof for at least 3 years or maybe more. On the other hand, phones with SD888 are just too expensive.
+86 Reply
Avatar
AHNAF March 30, 2021 at 07:10 PM
Bro 90fps is supported in SD 870?
+194 Reply
Avatar
Alex April 2, 2021 at 09:48 PM
AHNAF, Up to 144 hertz at 1440p is supported
+24 Reply
Avatar
Pinoy Astig April 15, 2021 at 05:42 PM
If all you do is gaming 24/7, yeah, the Poco F3 is good bang for the buck. But its cameras are cr4p, very bad, no OIS, no real tele lens, etc. Its AMOLED screen is also burn-in prone, the organic dyes would degrade faster with constant gaming due to the increased heat.
+65 Reply
Avatar
Fernando Sampaio April 18, 2021 at 09:21 PM
My cost benefit King was bought already. I'm waiting for delivery. It Will replace a Mi 5S Plus.
+10 Reply
Avatar
Turner May 17, 2021 at 01:36 PM
AHNAF, Not yet on pubgm, maybe next update i think
+1 Reply
Avatar
Thoufeeq May 18, 2021 at 07:07 PM
AHNAF, poco x3 pro support next update (pubg 90 fps)
+12 Reply
Avatar
Sami June 2, 2021 at 10:36 PM
AHNAF, No poco f3 do not support 90 fps the are very weak in game like pubg
+20 Reply
Avatar
kan June 22, 2021 at 11:44 AM
may i ask why this is a game-changer? For 2019, we got a few Chinese phones at around 300 USD with even the flagship chip 855. Now we have a sub-flagship chip for similar price.
+14 Reply
Avatar
kan June 22, 2021 at 11:45 AM
Pinoy Astig, well...i dont see many reviews verdict the camera is cr4p....its mid range performance. and the phone is mid range price with a premium chip.
+3 Reply
Avatar
Nick August 29, 2021 at 01:14 PM
Sami, Poco F3 supports all UHD settings. First adjust your device with 120fps refresh rate. Then download the UHD package.
+4 Reply
Avatar
ABnoy May 14, 2022 at 02:50 PM
Pinoy Astig, Burn-in? LMFAO. It will need a lot of stress to get an AMOLED screen burnt in, unlike TVs and Monitors that are always on and have high brightness.
+1 Reply
Avatar
Pinoy May 17, 2022 at 03:59 PM
Pinoy Astig, Bro, it is a mid-range device not a high-end one!
+2 Reply
Avatar
Snappy Man September 29, 2024 at 10:35 PM
And don't forget, the Snapdragon 888 is a little rice cooker as well.. boils up to 85 degrees effortlessly πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚
0 Reply
Avatar
Snappy Man September 29, 2024 at 10:38 PM
ABnoy, Don't forget that the display is one of the places they cut corners on these "Budget flagship killers" Lol and you can't expect the display to be as high end and mighty powerful like the ones you find on more expensive flagship devices
0 Reply
Avatar
Levi March 10, 2021 at 01:16 AM
Yeah throw a bit of o.c. on a single core (2.84 to 3.2ghz) and sell it like "new technology" . What's the point of releasing 870 if you had 888? It's not a budget chip anyways, no point to upgrade anything 800+ if you not gaming ... Won't see any real world gains anyways.
+54 Reply
Avatar
fff March 22, 2021 at 03:54 PM
to fill the gap obviously. I'm buying Poco F3 with 870 for lower price. No need that 888 anyway... and its heating issue
+67 Reply
Avatar
Abc April 25, 2021 at 07:58 PM
fff, Heating issue??? 870 is based on 7nm+ ( based on cortex a77) 888 is based on 5nm (which is more efficient with cortex X1 and a78) 870 is just o.c. 865 Whereas 888 is completely new and supposed to be more efficient. Although 870 is cheaper so...
+41 Reply
Avatar
Asd May 9, 2021 at 04:06 PM
Abc, "supposed" to be more efficient
+14 Reply
Avatar
Karoter June 13, 2021 at 05:11 AM
Abc, 5nm from Samsung vs 7nm+ from TSMC.... I don't think Samsung is much better in efficiency Probably the main reason why I refrained from buying any phone with 888
+29 Reply
Avatar
Chris July 13, 2021 at 05:37 AM
Abc, **870 is 7nm not 7nm+
+14 Reply