Exynos 1480 vs Snapdragon 888

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1480 (with Samsung Xclipse 530 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (Adreno 660). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1480
  • Higher GPU frequency (~55%)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 5 nm)
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
  • Supports 100% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 25.6 GB/s)
  • Performs 94% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows better (up to 11%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1135K vs 1021K
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1021736
1135878
CPU 348485 406119
GPU 226076 233383
Memory 182794 188085
UX 264381 308291
Total score 1021736 1135878
Samples [38 tests] [127 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1500
Multi-Core Score
3537
Asset compression 174.3 MB/sec 156.9 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 84.2 pages/sec 86.4 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 127.9 Mpixels/sec 104.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 65.6 images/sec 72.9 images/sec
HDR 109.3 Mpixels/sec 104.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 12.5 images/sec 12.1 images/sec
Photo processing 31.3 images/sec 26.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 5.04 Mpixels/sec 4.04 Mpixels/sec
Samples 19 tests 49 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
4509
Background blur 7.73 images/sec 7.75 images/sec
Face detection 3.62 images/sec 3.37 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.22 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.24 Gpixels/sec 0.28 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.32 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.05 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 16.2 Gpixels/sec 13.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 426.8 FPS 851.2 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 11 tests 19 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 459 505
Stability 98% 77%
Graphics test 3 FPS 4 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
1508
Score 982 1508
Stability 98% 91%
Graphics test 5 FPS 9 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
13134
13229
Web score 11788 12232
Video editing score 7255 7638
Data manipulation score 10941 10494
Photo editing score 23283 29866
Writing score 17673 15219
Phones tested Less than 3 11 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 83 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 26 FPS
[Ultra]
Shadowgun Legends - 89 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz - 112 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 58 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Asus Zenfone 8
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1480
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-17 (АртСм)AnTuTu1080442
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 -> SKLeoAnTuTu1062044
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (No)AnTuTu965699
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (Brice)GeekBench CPU1115 / 3126
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-06 (Mazen)AnTuTu1057022
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-02 -> NotezitGeekBench CPU1412 / 3348
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-18 (Soul)AnTuTu1210861
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (Marchi1962)GeekBench CPU1537 / 3989
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (Marchi1962)AnTuTu1253342
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-08 -> AlicanTuTuAnTuTu1198886

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1480 and Snapdragon 888

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.75 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2750 MHz 2840 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.4-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
Process 4 nanometers 5 nanometers
Transistor count - 10.3 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 8 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 530 Adreno 660
Architecture RDNA 2 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 1300 MHz 840 MHz
Pipelines 1 3
Shading units 128 256
Total shaders 128 768
FLOPS 665.6 Gigaflops 1290.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 780

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - X60
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 22
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5100 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps Up to 3000 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced March 2024 December 2020
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number S5E8845 SM8350
Official page Samsung Exynos 1480 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 1580 - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
151 (29.8%)
356 (70.2%)
Total votes: 507

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 888 and Exynos 1480, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!