Exynos 1680 vs Dimensity 9500s

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1680 (with Samsung Xclipse 550 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 9500s (Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
  • Performs 4x better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 233% higher memory bandwidth (85.3 against 25.6 GB/s)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 2.2x) AnTuTu 11 score – 3032K vs 1390K
  • 29% higher CPU clock speed (3730 vs 2900 MHz)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 4 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~34%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1390055
3032039
CPU 510705 896417
GPU 374535 1062397
Memory 204469 451911
UX 300346 621314
Total score 1390055 3032039
Samples [14 tests] [85 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
2725
Multi-Core Score
8932
Asset compression 212.5 MB/sec 374.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 125.8 pages/sec 259.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 144.7 Mpixels/sec 301.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 86.1 images/sec 231.8 images/sec
HDR 141.1 Mpixels/sec 267.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 18 images/sec 37.9 images/sec
Photo processing 39.6 images/sec 86.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 5.87 Mpixels/sec 10 Mpixels/sec
Samples 3 tests 22 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
21435
Background blur 13.3 images/sec 45.3 images/sec
Face detection 6.4 images/sec 25 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.33 Gpixels/sec 0.94 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.46 Gpixels/sec 1.22 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.42 Gpixels/sec 1.65 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.29 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 31.6 Gpixels/sec 72.9 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 958.9 FPS 3653.8 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 2 tests 17 tests

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1680
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-08 (Galaxy A57)AnTuTu 121544715
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-06 (yuh)Geekbench 7 GPU2412
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-03 -> RennsportGeekbench 7 GPU6058
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-03 -> RennsportGeekbench 7 CPU1216 / 4433
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 (Anonim)AnTuTu 111375246
MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-08 (Exostrider257)AnTuTu 123078063
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 (Taokodeprai)AnTuTu 123110819
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-03 (Van Viet)AnTuTu 122780867
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (RuL)AnTuTu 123308269
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (RuL)Geekbench 7 GPU18202

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1680 and Dimensity 9500s

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
1x 3.73 GHz – Cortex-X925
3x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A720
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2900 MHz 3730 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache - 128 KB
L2 cache - 2 MB
L3 cache - 12 MB
Process 4 nanometers 3 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 9 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 550 Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
Architecture RDNA 3 Valhall 5th gen
GPU frequency 1200 MHz 1612 MHz
Pipelines 2 12
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 256 1536
FLOPS 1228.8 Gigaflops 4952.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek NPU
NPU theoretical performance 19.6 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 5333 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 85.3 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1, UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 320MP, 3x 36MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem Shannon 5348 -
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5100 Mbps Up to 7300 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 6 7
Bluetooth 6.1 6.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced March 2026 January 2026
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number S5E8865 MT6991Z/SCZB, MT6991Z/ECZB
Official page Samsung Exynos 1680 official site MediaTek Dimensity 9500s official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
4 (10.3%)
35 (89.7%)
Total votes: 39

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 9500s and Exynos 1680, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Keviny9 June 9, 2026 at 05:21 PM
Exynos better only in ISP
0 Reply