Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 vs Dimensity 9500s

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (with Adreno 825 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 9500s (Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
  • Performs 2.1x better in floating-point computations
  • Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size than the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
  • Higher GPU frequency (~40%)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 4 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 31%) AnTuTu 11 score – 3032K vs 2314K
  • 16% higher CPU clock speed (3730 vs 3210 MHz)
  • Supports 11% higher memory bandwidth (85.3 against 76.8 GB/s)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
3032039
CPU 645495 896417
GPU 809405 1062397
Memory 372805 451911
UX 486712 621314
Total score 2314417 3032039
Samples [457 tests] [85 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 293.4 MB/sec 374.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 188.6 pages/sec 259.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 207.8 Mpixels/sec 301.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 152.7 images/sec 231.8 images/sec
HDR 216.4 Mpixels/sec 267.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 23.4 images/sec 37.9 images/sec
Photo processing 55.2 images/sec 86.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 7.25 Mpixels/sec 10 Mpixels/sec
Samples 50 tests 22 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 33.5 images/sec 45.3 images/sec
Face detection 16.8 images/sec 25 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.62 Gpixels/sec 0.94 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.77 Gpixels/sec 1.22 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.2 Gpixels/sec 1.65 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.24 Gpixels/sec 0.29 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 70.4 Gpixels/sec 72.9 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 2750.3 FPS 3653.8 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 35 tests 17 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 1688 -
Stability 83% -
Graphics test 13 FPS -
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 7641 -
Graphics test 29 FPS -
Section 1 34 FPS -
Section 2 29 FPS -
Section 3 25 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 3705 -
Graphics test 22 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 15597 -
Video editing score 7750 -
Data manipulation score 13734 -
Photo editing score 26988 -
Writing score 17764 -
Phones tested 8 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-01 (Yorik)AnTuTu 112477638
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (Luis)AnTuTu 122422061
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-29 (Thai)AnTuTu 122603535
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-29 (Aasif Juggar)AnTuTu 122498485
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Aasif Juggar)CPU Throttle78%
MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-03 (Van Viet)AnTuTu 122780867
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (RuL)AnTuTu 123308269
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (RuL)Geekbench 7 GPU18202
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (RuL)Geekbench 7 CPU2460 / 7817
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 (Zimz)AnTuTu 123279234

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 and Dimensity 9500s

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A720
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A720
2x 2.02 GHz – Cortex-A720
1x 3.73 GHz – Cortex-X925
3x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A720
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3210 MHz 3730 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache 128 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L3 cache 8 MB 12 MB
Process 4 nanometers 3 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 9 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 825 Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
Architecture Adreno 800 Valhall 5th gen
GPU frequency 1150 MHz 1612 MHz
Pipelines 2 12
Shading units 512 128
Total shaders 1024 1536
FLOPS 2355.2 Gigaflops 4952.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon MediaTek NPU

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4800 MHz 5333 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 76.8 Gb/s 85.3 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 320MP, 3x 36MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 60FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X75 -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 4200 Mbps Up to 7300 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 6.0 6.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced April 2025 January 2026
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number SM8735 MT6991Z/SCZB, MT6991Z/ECZB
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 official site MediaTek Dimensity 9500s official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
118 (15.2%)
658 (84.8%)
Total votes: 776

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 9500s and Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Jiafei October 1, 2026 at 01:07 PM
Which one is better for emulation?
0 Reply
Avatar
Ryu July 27, 2026 at 05:52 PM
9500s is way faster and cheaper. Good for Long term investment because the devices equipped with it have bigger batteries, excellent performance on all games with max fps at ultra graphics because even Dimensity 9300+ play them. With just simple ADB tweaks and a cooler you're good πŸ‘. No need for root or custom rom. On PC emulation it's rapidly receiving support even on directx 12 (vkd3d). Other emulators it runs excellent including PS2 and the rest. Nintendo switch emulation and ps3 emulation is on low support because of absence of custom drivers. It may come anytime soon. πŸŽ‰
+5 Reply
Avatar
D4C April 3, 2026 at 01:28 PM
I saw this comparison to compare Poco f7 and Poco x8 pro max
+39 Reply
Avatar
Fari F April 5, 2026 at 03:02 PM
Same here. But it has higher price. Just thinking to upgrade my Poco F7.
+10 Reply
Avatar
Alex January 30, 2026 at 02:21 PM
So poco X8 Pro Max has officially dethroned the F7
+69 Reply
Avatar
Well February 2, 2026 at 06:56 AM
Well i will just say that both get beated by redmagic 12 pro
+9 Reply
Avatar
I am February 2, 2026 at 07:50 PM
Well, bro red magic 12 pro is $200 more than poco
+29 Reply
Avatar
Clark April 1, 2026 at 02:11 AM
I will exchange my POCO F7 for the new POCO X8 Pro Max , not only for CPU comparison but the battery mAh .
+9 Reply
Avatar
Noops April 1, 2026 at 05:05 AM
Clark, no need to just get a redmi turbo 5 max, which is same x8 pro max but bigger battery (9500mah) and insane 100W charging for less money.
0 Reply
Avatar
haha April 1, 2026 at 07:10 AM
Noops, sorry its 9000 mah (to say the least)
0 Reply
Avatar
haloo June 12, 2026 at 07:31 PM
Not for PC/Console emulation, 8s gen 4 is still vastly superior in that regard, anything else yes.
+1 Reply