Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 7300

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 2200 (with Samsung Xclipse 920 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (Mali-G615 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200
  • Supports 100% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 25.6 GB/s)
  • Performs 87% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 63%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1434K vs 879K
  • Higher GPU frequency (~25%)
  • 12% higher CPU clock speed (2800 vs 2500 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1434169
CPU 472427 320191
GPU 390230 128437
Memory 216173 164451
UX 355339 266635
Total score 1434169 879714
Samples [52 tests] [311 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1588
Multi-Core Score
3958
Asset compression 169.2 MB/sec 166 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 103 pages/sec 68.3 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 133.7 Mpixels/sec 114.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 101.3 images/sec 53.4 images/sec
HDR 130.8 Mpixels/sec 102.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 14.7 images/sec 10.7 images/sec
Photo processing 34.9 images/sec 25.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.65 Mpixels/sec 4.62 Mpixels/sec
Samples 25 tests 49 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 2200 +302%
10088
Background blur 14.6 images/sec 4.57 images/sec
Face detection 9.75 images/sec 2.52 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.41 Gpixels/sec 0.12 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.36 Gpixels/sec 0.17 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.48 Gpixels/sec 0.12 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 38.1 Gpixels/sec 4.25 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1860.5 FPS 439.4 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 14 tests 40 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Exynos 2200 +160%
900
Score 900 346
Stability 66% 98%
Graphics test 7 FPS 3 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 3972 -
Stability 66% -
Graphics test 15 FPS -
Section 1 18 FPS -
Section 2 15 FPS -
Section 3 12 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 1918 -
Stability 64% -
Graphics test 11 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
13460
13626
Web score 11932 13221
Video editing score 7385 6420
Data manipulation score 12323 9644
Photo editing score 24230 35886
Writing score 16664 16658
Phones tested 4 models 22 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 ((tiktok:frowners_tech_))AnTuTu 121674395
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 -> MOLANGAnTuTu 121628220
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 -> MOLANGGeekbench 6 GPU10630
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Ogurchik))AnTuTu 121628220
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 (Hangal)AnTuTu 111587642
MediaTek Dimensity 7300
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-03 -> MilomichaelphAnTuTu 11914149
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (Gladly)AnTuTu 121024337
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (Антон)AnTuTu 121010952
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-01 (Chelik)AnTuTu 121005243
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (Keyn)AnTuTu 12994900

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2200 and Dimensity 7300

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2800 MHz 2500 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 7 W 4 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 920 Mali-G615 MP2
Architecture RDNA 2 Valhall 4rd gen
GPU frequency 1306 MHz 1047 MHz
Pipelines 3 2
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 384 256
FLOPS 1003 Gigaflops 536.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 655

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5300 -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 -
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7350 Mbps Up to 3270 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced January 2022 June 2024
Class Flagship Mid range
Model number S5E9925 MT6878 MT6878V/ZA MT6878V_A/ZA
Official page Samsung Exynos 2200 official site MediaTek Dimensity 7300 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2500 - MediaTek Dimensity 7400

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
77 (87.5%)
11 (12.5%)
Total votes: 88

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 7300 and Exynos 2200, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!