Exynos 2200 vs Exynos 1480

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 2200 (with Samsung Xclipse 920 graphics) and Exynos 1480 (Samsung Xclipse 530). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200
  • Supports 100% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 25.6 GB/s)
  • Performs 51% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows better (up to 40%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1434K vs 1021K
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1434169
1021736
CPU 472427 348485
GPU 390230 226076
Memory 216173 182794
UX 355339 264381
Total score 1434169 1021736
Samples [52 tests] [38 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1588
Multi-Core Score
3958
Asset compression 169.2 MB/sec 174.3 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 103 pages/sec 84.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 133.7 Mpixels/sec 127.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 101.3 images/sec 65.6 images/sec
HDR 130.8 Mpixels/sec 109.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 14.7 images/sec 12.5 images/sec
Photo processing 34.9 images/sec 31.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.65 Mpixels/sec 5.04 Mpixels/sec
Samples 25 tests 19 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 2200 +146%
10088
Background blur 14.6 images/sec 7.73 images/sec
Face detection 9.75 images/sec 3.62 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.41 Gpixels/sec 0.16 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.36 Gpixels/sec 0.24 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.48 Gpixels/sec 0.23 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 38.1 Gpixels/sec 16.2 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1860.5 FPS 426.8 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 14 tests 11 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
900
Score 900 459
Stability 66% 98%
Graphics test 7 FPS 3 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 3972 -
Stability 66% -
Graphics test 15 FPS -
Section 1 18 FPS -
Section 2 15 FPS -
Section 3 12 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
1918
Score 1918 982
Stability 64% 98%
Graphics test 11 FPS 5 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
13460
13134
Web score 11932 11788
Video editing score 7385 7255
Data manipulation score 12323 10941
Photo editing score 24230 23283
Writing score 16664 17673
Phones tested 4 models Less than 3

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 -> MOLANGAnTuTu 121628220
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 -> MOLANGGeekbench 6 GPU10630
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Ogurchik))AnTuTu 121628220
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 (Hangal)AnTuTu 111587642
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 (Basiks)AnTuTu 111227101
Samsung Exynos 1480
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-17 (АртСм)AnTuTu 111080442
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 -> SKLeoAnTuTu 111062044
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (No)AnTuTu 11965699
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (Brice)Geekbench 6 CPU1115 / 3126
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-06 (Mazen)AnTuTu 111057022

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2200 and Exynos 1480

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
4x 2.75 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2800 MHz 2750 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.2-A
L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 7 W 5 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 920 Samsung Xclipse 530
Architecture RDNA 2 RDNA 2
GPU frequency 1306 MHz 1300 MHz
Pipelines 3 1
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 384 128
FLOPS 1003 Gigaflops 665.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5300 -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7350 Mbps Up to 5100 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 1280 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced January 2022 March 2024
Class Flagship Mid range
Model number S5E9925 S5E8845
Official page Samsung Exynos 2200 official site Samsung Exynos 1480 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2500 - Samsung Exynos 1580

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
454 (78.8%)
122 (21.2%)
Total votes: 576

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Exynos 1480 and Exynos 2200, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!