Exynos 2400 vs Tensor G3

We compared the 10-core Samsung Exynos 2400 (Samsung Xclipse 940) with the older 9-core Google Tensor G3 (Mali-G715 MP7) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2400
  • Performs 2.1x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 45%) AnTuTu 11 score – 2046K vs 1409K
  • Higher GPU frequency (~23%)
  • Has 1 more cores
  • 10% higher CPU clock speed (3210 vs 2910 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
2046435
1409016
CPU 698933 482403
GPU 637772 384611
Memory 301201 218603
UX 408529 323399
Total score 2046435 1409016
Samples [93 tests] [33 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
2115
1722
Multi-Core Score
6826
4458
Asset compression 285.5 MB/sec 197.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 167.2 pages/sec 134.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 165.6 Mpixels/sec 148.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 168.2 images/sec 82.1 images/sec
HDR 207.3 Mpixels/sec 142.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 25.3 images/sec 13.2 images/sec
Photo processing 63.9 images/sec 48.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 7.73 Mpixels/sec 5.34 Mpixels/sec
Samples 38 tests 11 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 2400 +101%
16273
8076
Background blur 28.2 images/sec 10.6 images/sec
Face detection 15 images/sec 6.85 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.6 Gpixels/sec 0.16 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.51 Gpixels/sec 0.35 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.84 Gpixels/sec 0.32 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.08 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 77.8 Gpixels/sec 11.9 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 2872.5 FPS 1088 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 29 tests 9 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
1769
982
Score 1769 982
Stability 67% 74%
Graphics test 13 FPS 7 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 8302 -
Graphics test 32 FPS -
Section 1 37 FPS -
Section 2 31 FPS -
Section 3 25 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 3812 -
Stability 57% -
Graphics test 22 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 16695 -
Video editing score 8032 -
Data manipulation score 14884 -
Photo editing score 35055 -
Writing score 21619 -
Phones tested 3 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2400
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Neto)AnTuTu2303141
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-09 -> JamesPatrickAnTuTu2027080
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-08 (Ajr)AnTuTu2027080
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-03 (Halil)GeekBench CPU2215 / 7111
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-03 (Halil)GeekBench GPU18625
Google Tensor G3
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-28 (asfiii-malik)AnTuTu1515235
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-28 (asfiii-baloch)AnTuTu1515235
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-05 (s1mpick)AnTuTu1338293
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-04 (reazz)AnTuTu1356451
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-04 (Bilal Ahmed)AnTuTu1367231

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2400 and Tensor G3

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X3
4x 2.37 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 10 9
Frequency 3210 MHz 2910 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9-A
L3 cache 8 MB -
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 940 Mali-G715 MP7
Architecture RDNA 3 Valhall 4th gen
GPU frequency 1095 MHz 890 MHz
Pipelines 6 7
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 768 896
FLOPS 3406.8 Gigaflops 1594.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4200 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5400 Exynos 5300i
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 12100 Mbps Up to 7300 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 3700 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 7
Bluetooth 5.3 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced January 2024 October 2023
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9945 GS301 (S5P9865)
Official page Samsung Exynos 2400 official site Google Tensor G3 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2500 - Google Tensor G5

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
397 (84.8%)
71 (15.2%)
Total votes: 468

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Tensor G3 and Exynos 2400, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!