Exynos 2400 vs Exynos 2200
We compared the 10-core Samsung Exynos 2400 (Samsung Xclipse 940) with the older 8-core Exynos 2200 (Samsung Xclipse 920) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2400
- Performs 3.4x better in floating-point computations
- Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size than the Exynos 2200
- Shows significantly better (up to 43%) AnTuTu 11 score β 2046K vs 1434K
- Has 2 more cores
- Supports 33% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 51.2 GB/s)
- 15% higher CPU clock speed (3210 vs 2800 MHz)
- Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200
- Higher GPU frequency (~19%)
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 11
| CPU | 698933 | 472427 |
| GPU | 637772 | 390230 |
| Memory | 301201 | 216173 |
| UX | 408529 | 355339 |
| Total score | 2046435 | 1434169 |
| Samples | [93 tests] | [52 tests] |
GeekBench 6
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Asset compression | 285.5 MB/sec | 169.2 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 167.2 pages/sec | 103 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 165.6 Mpixels/sec | 133.7 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 168.2 images/sec | 101.3 images/sec |
| HDR | 207.3 Mpixels/sec | 130.8 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 25.3 images/sec | 14.7 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 63.9 images/sec | 34.9 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 7.73 Mpixels/sec | 4.65 Mpixels/sec |
| Samples | 38 tests | 25 tests |
Compute Score (GPU)
| Background blur | 28.2 images/sec | 14.6 images/sec |
| Face detection | 15 images/sec | 9.75 images/sec |
| Horizon detection | 0.6 Gpixels/sec | 0.41 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge detection | 0.51 Gpixels/sec | 0.36 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian blur | 0.84 Gpixels/sec | 0.48 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature matching | 0.22 Gpixels/sec | 0.15 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo matching | 77.8 Gpixels/sec | 38.1 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle physics | 2872.5 FPS | 1860.5 FPS |
| API | Vulkan | Vulkan |
| Samples | 29 tests | 14 tests |
3DMark
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Score | 1769 | 900 |
| Stability | 67% | 66% |
| Graphics test | 13 FPS | 7 FPS |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Score | 8302 | 3972 |
| Stability | - | 66% |
| Graphics test | 32 FPS | 15 FPS |
| Section 1 | 37 FPS | 18 FPS |
| Section 2 | 31 FPS | 15 FPS |
| Section 3 | 25 FPS | 12 FPS |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Score | 3812 | 1918 |
| Stability | 57% | 64% |
| Graphics test | 22 FPS | 11 FPS |
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 16695 | 11932 |
| Video editing score | 8032 | 7385 |
| Data manipulation score | 14884 | 12323 |
| Photo editing score | 35055 | 24230 |
| Writing score | 21619 | 16664 |
| Phones tested | 3 models | 4 models |
Recent User Tests
Samsung Exynos 2400
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-30 (Rakson) | AnTuTu 12 | 2303953 |
| π 2026-09-27 (Halil) | AnTuTu 12 | 2426875 |
| π 2026-09-25 (Omar_syriangamerr) | AnTuTu 12 | 2245977 |
| π 2026-09-12 -> Viljami22 | AnTuTu 12 | 2321618 |
| π 2026-09-11 -> S25fe6833 | AnTuTu 12 | 2388378 |
Samsung Exynos 2200
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-25 ((tiktok:frowners_tech_)) | AnTuTu 12 | 1674395 |
| π 2026-09-21 -> MOLANG | AnTuTu 12 | 1628220 |
| π 2026-09-21 -> MOLANG | Geekbench 6 GPU | 10630 |
| π 2026-09-12 (Ogurchik)) | AnTuTu 12 | 1628220 |
| π 2026-09-09 (Hangal) | AnTuTu 11 | 1587642 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2400 and Exynos 2200CPU
| Architecture | 1x 3.21 GHz β Cortex-X4 2x 2.9 GHz β Cortex-A720 3x 2.6 GHz β Cortex-A720 4x 1.95 GHz β Cortex-A520 |
1x 2.8 GHz β Cortex-X2 3x 2.52 GHz β Cortex-A710 4x 1.82 GHz β Cortex-A510 |
| Cores | 10 | 8 |
| Frequency | 3210 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9-A |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB |
| Process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 6 W | 7 W |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | Samsung |
Graphics
| GPU name | Samsung Xclipse 940 | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3 | RDNA 2 |
| GPU frequency | 1095 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Pipelines | 6 | 3 |
| Shading units | 128 | 128 |
| Total shaders | 768 | 384 |
| FLOPS | 3406.8 Gigaflops | 1003 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12.1 | 12.1 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 4200 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 68.2 Gb/s | 51.2 Gb/s |
| Max size | 24 GB | 24 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2400 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 320MP | 1x 200MP |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Exynos 5400 | Exynos 5300 |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 12100 Mbps | Up to 7350 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 3670 Mbps | Up to 3670 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | January 2024 | January 2022 |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Model number | S5E9945 | S5E9925 |
| Official page | Samsung Exynos 2400 official site | Samsung Exynos 2200 official site |
| Successor | - Samsung Exynos 2500 | - Samsung Exynos 2500 |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 883
