Exynos 2400 vs Tensor G4

We compared the 10-core Samsung Exynos 2400 (Samsung Xclipse 940) with the newer 8-core Google Tensor G4 (Mali-G715 MP7) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2400
  • Performs 2x better in floating-point computations
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Shows better (up to 35%) AnTuTu 11 score – 2046K vs 1519K
  • Higher GPU frequency (~16%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
2046435
1519937
CPU 698933 536742
GPU 637772 414930
Memory 301201 215572
UX 408529 352693
Total score 2046435 1519937
Samples [93 tests] [25 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
2115
1707
Multi-Core Score
6826
4431
Asset compression 285.5 MB/sec 177.3 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 167.2 pages/sec 134 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 165.6 Mpixels/sec 157 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 168.2 images/sec 122 images/sec
HDR 207.3 Mpixels/sec 128.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 25.3 images/sec 15.8 images/sec
Photo processing 63.9 images/sec 39.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 7.73 Mpixels/sec 4.65 Mpixels/sec
Samples 38 tests 11 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
16273
8744
Background blur 28.2 images/sec 13.4 images/sec
Face detection 15 images/sec 8.51 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.6 Gpixels/sec 0.32 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.51 Gpixels/sec 0.3 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.84 Gpixels/sec 0.36 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.11 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 77.8 Gpixels/sec 26.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 2872.5 FPS 1273.7 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 29 tests 9 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
1769
1049
Score 1769 1049
Stability 67% 84%
Graphics test 13 FPS 8 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 8302 -
Graphics test 32 FPS -
Section 1 37 FPS -
Section 2 31 FPS -
Section 3 25 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 3812 -
Stability 57% -
Graphics test 22 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
17172
13174
Web score 16695 10521
Video editing score 8032 7569
Data manipulation score 14884 14718
Photo editing score 35055 21074
Writing score 21619 15880
Phones tested 3 models 4 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2400
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Neto)AnTuTu 112303141
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-09 -> JamesPatrickAnTuTu 112027080
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-08 (Ajr)AnTuTu 112027080
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-03 (Halil)Geekbench 6 CPU2215 / 7111
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-03 (Halil)Geekbench 6 GPU18625
Google Tensor G4
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-18 -> Oleg 16 cmAnTuTu 111423579
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-27 (feraroof43)AnTuTu 111626655
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (Leif)AnTuTu 111590049
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (Kazin)AnTuTu 111723964
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-14 (123)Geekbench 6 GPU8744

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2400 and Tensor G4

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A520
Cores 10 8
Frequency 3210 MHz 3100 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L3 cache 8 MB -
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W -
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 940 Mali-G715 MP7
Architecture RDNA 3 Valhall 4th gen
GPU frequency 1095 MHz 940 MHz
Pipelines 6 7
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 768 896
FLOPS 3406.8 Gigaflops 1684.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4200 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 3840 x 2400
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP -
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5400 Exynos 5400c
4G support LTE Cat. 24 -
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 12100 Mbps -
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 6 7
Bluetooth 5.3 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced January 2024 August 2024
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9945 GS401 (S5P9875)
Official page Samsung Exynos 2400 official site -
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2500 - Google Tensor G5

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
345 (83.3%)
69 (16.7%)
Total votes: 414

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Tensor G4 and Exynos 2400, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!