Exynos 2600 vs Dimensity 9400 Plus

We compared the 10-core Samsung Exynos 2600 (Samsung Xclipse 960) with the older 8-core MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus (Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2600
  • Has a smaller size transistor (2 versus 3 nm)
  • Performs 42% better in floating-point computations
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size than the Dimensity 9400 Plus
  • Shows better (up to 10%) AnTuTu 11 score – 3161K vs 2874K
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
  • Higher GPU frequency (~64%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
3161126
CPU 1023425 869347
GPU 1236436 1015558
Memory 384525 357663
UX 516740 632388
Total score 3161126 2874956
Samples [20 tests] [171 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 459.4 MB/sec 359.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 328.1 pages/sec 252.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 345 Mpixels/sec 300.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 259.1 images/sec 223.1 images/sec
HDR 344.2 Mpixels/sec 267.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 41.7 images/sec 33.2 images/sec
Photo processing 97.1 images/sec 78.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 12.2 Mpixels/sec 9.25 Mpixels/sec
Samples 8 tests 20 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
27019
Background blur 43.4 images/sec 49 images/sec
Face detection 20.2 images/sec 28.1 images/sec
Horizon detection 1.03 Gpixels/sec 0.94 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 1.41 Gpixels/sec 1.21 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 2.05 Gpixels/sec 1.5 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.28 Gpixels/sec 0.34 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 95 Gpixels/sec 72.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 4524 FPS 3826.1 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 7 tests 17 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 3109 2377
Stability - 77%
Graphics test 23 FPS 18 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
11935
Score 11935 10715
Graphics test 45 FPS 41 FPS
Section 1 51 FPS 45 FPS
Section 2 44 FPS 41 FPS
Section 3 39 FPS 36 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 5777
Graphics test - 34 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
20423
Web score 21279 12340
Video editing score 8171 7385
Data manipulation score 16909 14039
Photo editing score 40764 40750
Writing score 30248 27541
Phones tested Less than 3 10 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2600
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 -> SerostAnTuTu 123359689
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (gollim)AnTuTu 123269772
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (Pires)AnTuTu 123302245
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-20 (Shaco)AnTuTu 123216468
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (Artem)AnTuTu 113113554
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (CherePavel)AnTuTu 123215890
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (JJ)AnTuTu 121116490
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-22 (Anand)AnTuTu 122939313
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 -> Syed Shahzaib SubhaniAnTuTu 123103556
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 -> la.mih0AnTuTu 122649888

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2600 and Dimensity 9400 Plus

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.8 GHz – C1-Ultra
3x 3.25 GHz – C1-Pro
6x 2.75 GHz – C1-Pro
1x 3.73 GHz – Cortex-X925
3x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A720
Cores 10 8
Frequency 3800 MHz 3730 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.3-A ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache 192 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 3 MB 2 MB
L3 cache 16 MB 12 MB
Process 2 nanometers 3 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W 9 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 960 Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
Architecture RDNA 4 Valhall 5th gen
GPU frequency 980 MHz 1612 MHz
Pipelines 8 12
Shading units 448 128
Total shaders 1792 1536
FLOPS 7024.6 Gigaflops 4952.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) AI engine with 32K MAC NPU MediaTek NPU 890
NPU theoretical performance 59 TOPS 50 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 5333 MHz 5333 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 85.3 Gb/s 85.3 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5410 -
4G support - LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 14790 Mbps Up to 7300 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 4900 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 6.0 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced December 2025 April 2025
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9965 MT6991, MT6991Z/TCZA
Official page Samsung Exynos 2600 official site MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
42 (49.4%)
43 (50.6%)
Total votes: 85

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 9400 Plus and Exynos 2600, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
RandomAccessMemory December 23, 2025 at 08:45 AM
Wait so Dimensity 9400+ has stronger GPU Score than Exynos 2600?
0 Reply