Exynos 2600 vs Exynos 2500

We compared two 10-core processors: Samsung Exynos 2600 (with Samsung Xclipse 960 graphics) and Exynos 2500 (Samsung Xclipse 950). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2600
  • Performs 72% better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (2 versus 3 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 38%) AnTuTu 11 score – 3161K vs 2289K
  • 15% higher CPU clock speed (3800 vs 3300 MHz)
  • Supports 11% higher memory bandwidth (85.3 against 76.8 GB/s)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
3161126
2289696
CPU 1023425 771016
GPU 1236436 723824
Memory 384525 356421
UX 516740 438435
Total score 3161126 2289696
Samples [20 tests] [8 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
3235
Multi-Core Score
10904
Asset compression 459.4 MB/sec 390.2 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 328.1 pages/sec 179.4 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 345 Mpixels/sec 218.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 259.1 images/sec 247.5 images/sec
HDR 344.2 Mpixels/sec 309 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 41.7 images/sec 36.4 images/sec
Photo processing 97.1 images/sec 89.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 12.2 Mpixels/sec 12.7 Mpixels/sec
Samples 8 tests Less than 3
Compute Score (GPU)
27019
18873
Background blur 43.4 images/sec 35.4 images/sec
Face detection 20.2 images/sec 15.1 images/sec
Horizon detection 1.03 Gpixels/sec 0.45 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 1.41 Gpixels/sec 0.7 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 2.05 Gpixels/sec 1.6 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.28 Gpixels/sec 0.23 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 95 Gpixels/sec 82.2 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 4524 FPS 3446.8 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 7 tests 2 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
3109
Score 3109 2231
Stability - 54%
Graphics test 23 FPS 17 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
11935
Score 11935 9397
Graphics test 45 FPS 36 FPS
Section 1 51 FPS 43 FPS
Section 2 44 FPS 35 FPS
Section 3 39 FPS 29 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
20423
16035
Web score 21279 15720
Video editing score 8171 8133
Data manipulation score 16909 11954
Photo editing score 40764 32035
Writing score 30248 22532
Phones tested Less than 3 Less than 3

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2600
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 -> SerostAnTuTu 123359689
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (gollim)AnTuTu 123269772
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (Pires)AnTuTu 123302245
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-20 (Shaco)AnTuTu 123216468
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (Artem)AnTuTu 113113554
Samsung Exynos 2500
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-16 -> INFCAnTuTu 112220403
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-01 (Koss)AnTuTu 112437711
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-19 (Yell)AnTuTu 112112394
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-26 -> everviolet12Geekbench 6 GPU18873
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-26 -> everviolet12AnTuTu 112496663

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2600 and Exynos 2500

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.8 GHz – C1-Ultra
3x 3.25 GHz – C1-Pro
6x 2.75 GHz – C1-Pro
1x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X925
2x 2.74 GHz – Cortex-A725
5x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A725
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
Cores 10 10
Frequency 3800 MHz 3300 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.3-A ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache 192 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 3 MB 3 MB
L3 cache 16 MB 16 MB
Process 2 nanometers 3 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W -
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 960 Samsung Xclipse 950
Architecture RDNA 4 RDNA 3
GPU frequency 980 MHz 999 MHz
Pipelines 8 8
Shading units 448 128
Total shaders 1792 1024
FLOPS 7024.6 Gigaflops 4091.9 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.4
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) AI engine with 32K MAC NPU Yes
NPU theoretical performance 59 TOPS 59 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 5333 MHz 4800 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 85.3 Gb/s 76.8 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5410 Exynos 5400
4G support - LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 14790 Mbps Up to 12100 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 4900 Mbps Up to 3670 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 6.0 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced December 2025 June 2025
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9965 S5E9955
Official page Samsung Exynos 2600 official site Samsung Exynos 2500 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
317 (94.1%)
20 (5.9%)
Total votes: 337

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Exynos 2500 and Exynos 2600, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Muhamamd February 4, 2026 at 10:55 AM
It's supposed to have LPDDR6 RAM according to Ice Universe and not the previous gen.
+3 Reply
Avatar
Hijibij December 26, 2025 at 06:33 PM
I think Exynos 2600 shouldn't have any connectivity section, cause it doesn't have any modem.
+7 Reply
Avatar
Hijibij December 22, 2025 at 06:24 PM
50% improve in Ray tracing than E2500 means we get almost 19.05 Mpixels/sec And 113% boost in NPU means NPU theoretical performance is 125.67 TOPS. But why did you put that GPU score wrong. (Date:22/12/2025, 11:54 PM)
+16 Reply
Avatar
Hijibij February 22, 2026 at 05:57 PM
Once I said that we could get 19.05 Mpixels/sec . But now I think like why does they said 50% improve in ray tracing. Where the Mpixels rate haven't even crossed last years 12.7.
0 Reply
Joe February 27, 2026 at 01:55 AM
The benchmark that you are reading is for the CPU not the GPU.
+2 Reply