Exynos 2600 vs Dimensity 9500

We compared the 10-core Samsung Exynos 2600 (Samsung Xclipse 960) with the older 8-core MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (Mali-G1 Ultra MP12) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2600
  • Has a smaller size transistor (2 versus 3 nm)
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Performs 33% better in floating-point computations
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9500
  • Higher GPU frequency (~75%)
  • Shows better (up to 19%) AnTuTu 11 score – 3760K vs 3161K
  • 11% higher CPU clock speed (4210 vs 3800 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
3161126
3760662
CPU 1023425 1048345
GPU 1236436 1432351
Memory 384525 476680
UX 516740 803286
Total score 3161126 3760662
Samples [20 tests] [119 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
3352
Multi-Core Score
10904
Asset compression 459.4 MB/sec 397.3 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 328.1 pages/sec 292.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 345 Mpixels/sec 328.1 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 259.1 images/sec 234.3 images/sec
HDR 344.2 Mpixels/sec 328.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 41.7 images/sec 40.9 images/sec
Photo processing 97.1 images/sec 109.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 12.2 Mpixels/sec 10.3 Mpixels/sec
Samples 8 tests 29 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
27019
Background blur 43.4 images/sec 47.2 images/sec
Face detection 20.2 images/sec 26.1 images/sec
Horizon detection 1.03 Gpixels/sec 0.78 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 1.41 Gpixels/sec 1.31 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 2.05 Gpixels/sec 1.68 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.28 Gpixels/sec 0.31 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 95 Gpixels/sec 91.9 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 4524 FPS 3324.6 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 7 tests 14 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 3109 3119
Stability - 57%
Graphics test 23 FPS 23 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
11935
13319
Score 11935 13319
Graphics test 45 FPS 51 FPS
Section 1 51 FPS 55 FPS
Section 2 44 FPS 52 FPS
Section 3 39 FPS 43 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
20423
Web score 21279 14375
Video editing score 8171 5995
Data manipulation score 16909 12159
Photo editing score 40764 34571
Writing score 30248 22695
Phones tested Less than 3 4 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2600
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-30 -> SerostAnTuTu 123359689
📘 2026-09-26 (gollim)AnTuTu 123269772
📘 2026-09-24 (Pires)AnTuTu 123302245
📘 2026-09-20 (Shaco)AnTuTu 123216468
📘 2026-09-06 (Artem)AnTuTu 113113554
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-10-04 (Elvin)AnTuTu 113330144
📘 2026-10-04 (SillyKilly)AnTuTu 123461876
📘 2026-10-03 (ISLAH AMINE)AnTuTu 123544347
📘 2026-10-03 (hi)AnTuTu 123485917
📘 2026-10-02 (weipoh09)AnTuTu 123319530

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2600 and Dimensity 9500

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.8 GHz – C1-Ultra
3x 3.25 GHz – C1-Pro
6x 2.75 GHz – C1-Pro
1x 4.21 GHz – C1-Ultra
3x 3.5 GHz – C1-Premium
4x 2.7 GHz – C1-Pro
Cores 10 8
Frequency 3800 MHz 4210 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.3-A ARMv9.3-A
L1 cache 192 KB 192 KB
L2 cache 3 MB 2 MB
L3 cache 16 MB 16 MB
Process 2 nanometers 3 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W 9 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 960 Mali-G1 Ultra MP12
Architecture RDNA 4 Valhall 5th gen
GPU frequency 980 MHz 1716 MHz
Pipelines 8 12
Shading units 448 128
Total shaders 1792 1536
FLOPS 7024.6 Gigaflops 5271.5 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.4
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) AI engine with 32K MAC NPU MediaTek NPU 990
NPU theoretical performance 59 TOPS 100 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 5333 MHz 5333 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 85.3 Gb/s 85.3 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 -
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5410 -
4G support - LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 14790 Mbps Up to 10700 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 4900 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 6.0 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced December 2025 September 2025
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9965 MT6993
Official page Samsung Exynos 2600 official site MediaTek Dimensity 9500 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
567 (51.3%)
539 (48.7%)
Total votes: 1106

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 9500 and Exynos 2600, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Juan Costa September 20, 2026 at 07:40 AM
they are pretty evenly matched but 2nm and RDNA 4 should give the exynos an edge
0 Reply
Davlet93 April 6, 2026 at 07:37 PM
Одно не понятно, голосов больше у эскимоса, да спапдрагон король в мобильном сегменте, но сразу за ним дайменсити, объясню почему медиатек уступает уступает снапу только в одном, в эмуляции ПК игр из-за драйверов mali. А так я бы сказал в остальном медиатек 9500 уделывает ген 5 по всем параметрам, а экснос можно сравнивать каким нибудь тензором, скорее 2600 окажется намного лучше чем тензор
+4 Reply
Avatar
Hassan TH February 27, 2026 at 05:49 AM
Exynos 2nm (new technology) Stability (durable)
+17 Reply
Favi12 December 22, 2025 at 11:57 PM
The Dimensity is better why is everyone voting for Exynos??
+60 Reply
Avatar
Pro_G4mer_Plus December 23, 2025 at 01:04 PM
I think they are misleaded by the nano review overall score
+35 Reply
Avatar
Muhammed Iliyaz Ahmed February 23, 2026 at 01:47 AM
Because Exynos is based on a 2nm lithography chipset, which is way more power efficient, and New Technology, Antutu score does'nt defines a CPU capability, it is the Architecture and Optimization...
+7 Reply
Avatar
Non February 23, 2026 at 04:34 AM
Have you ever heard of rdna 4 😬
+3 Reply
Avatar
hhaha February 23, 2026 at 09:25 AM
agreed, dimensity better, since exynos 2600 failed to catch up against 8E gen 4 let alone d9400.
+7 Reply
Avatar
Jsuddj March 6, 2026 at 12:53 PM
hhaha, Not really that was before on lab testing real world performance is actually edge to edge with 8E gen5 when it still haven't received any optimization i think Samsung have really well optimized its system Driver, also for some reason Nanoreview didn't update the GPU performance other than AnTuTu when that was released on early testing
0 Reply
Samuel28 March 6, 2026 at 10:45 PM
Dimensity 9400 already has issues with the overheating, and this one overheats more due to raw power and likes to over clockspeed that melts your phone Unlike the Exynos 2600 which does not overheat during normal apps and games
+7 Reply
Avatar
Sankor March 22, 2026 at 06:20 PM
hhaha, Dimensity is still behind apple,Qualcomm and Samsung (better that tensor tho)
0 Reply
Avatar
Sankor March 28, 2026 at 06:32 PM
hhaha, Are you high or blind?
0 Reply
Avatar
Sankor April 5, 2026 at 01:59 PM
Sankor, Where did you get the idea that MediaTek(Dimensity) is behind Exynos? It's not that far behind Apple or Qualcomm either. Why do you think that?
+3 Reply