Exynos 2600 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 Pro
We compared the 10-core Samsung Exynos 2600 (Samsung Xclipse 960) with the newer 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 Pro (Adreno 850) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2600
- Performs 58% better in floating-point computations
- Has 2 more cores
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 Pro
- Higher GPU frequency (~48%)
- Shows significantly better (up to 53%) AnTuTu 11 score β 4835K vs 3161K
- 34% higher CPU clock speed (5110 vs 3800 MHz)
- Supports 33% higher memory bandwidth (113.8 against 85.3 GB/s)
- Better instruction set architecture
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 11
| CPU | 1023425 | 1368930 |
| GPU | 1236436 | 1854826 |
| Memory | 384525 | 865423 |
| UX | 516740 | 746233 |
| Total score | 3161126 | 4835412 |
| Samples | [20 tests] | Less than 3 |
GeekBench 6
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Asset compression | 459.4 MB/sec | - |
| HTML 5 Browser | 328.1 pages/sec | - |
| PDF Renderer | 345 Mpixels/sec | - |
| Image detection | 259.1 images/sec | - |
| HDR | 344.2 Mpixels/sec | - |
| Background blur | 41.7 images/sec | - |
| Photo processing | 97.1 images/sec | - |
| Ray tracing | 12.2 Mpixels/sec | - |
| Samples | 8 tests | - |
Compute Score (GPU)
| Background blur | 43.4 images/sec | - |
| Face detection | 20.2 images/sec | - |
| Horizon detection | 1.03 Gpixels/sec | - |
| Edge detection | 1.41 Gpixels/sec | - |
| Gaussian blur | 2.05 Gpixels/sec | - |
| Feature matching | 0.28 Gpixels/sec | - |
| Stereo matching | 95 Gpixels/sec | - |
| Particle physics | 4524 FPS | - |
| API | Vulkan | - |
| Samples | 7 tests | - |
3DMark
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Score | 3109 | - |
| Graphics test | 23 FPS | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Score | 11935 | - |
| Graphics test | 45 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 51 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 44 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 39 FPS | - |
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 21279 | - |
| Video editing score | 8171 | - |
| Data manipulation score | 16909 | - |
| Photo editing score | 40764 | - |
| Writing score | 30248 | - |
| Phones tested | Less than 3 | - |
Recent User Tests
Samsung Exynos 2600
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-06 (Artem) | AnTuTu | 3113554 |
| π 2026-08-11 (Phrog) | GeekBench CPU | 3167 / 11029 |
| π 2026-08-11 (Phrog) | AnTuTu | 3161126 |
| π 2026-07-29 (David Vasic) | AnTuTu | 3317117 |
| π 2026-07-26 (Simon) | AnTuTu | 3215235 |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-20 (Babababi) | AnTuTu | 5836880 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2600 and Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 ProCPU
| Architecture | 1x 3.8 GHz β C1-Ultra 3x 3.25 GHz β C1-Pro 6x 2.75 GHz β C1-Pro |
2x 5.11 GHz β Canyon 3x 4.03 GHz β Gelas-b 3x 3.74 GHz β Gelas |
| Cores | 10 | 8 |
| Frequency | 3800 MHz | 5110 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv9.3-A | ARMv9.4-A |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | - |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | - |
| Process | 2 nanometers | 2 nanometers |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 8 W | - |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
Graphics
| GPU name | Samsung Xclipse 960 | Adreno 850 |
| Architecture | RDNA 4 | Adreno 800 |
| GPU frequency | 980 MHz | 1450 MHz |
| Pipelines | 8 | 3 |
| Shading units | 448 | 512 |
| Total shaders | 1792 | 1536 |
| FLOPS | 7024.6 Gigaflops | 4454.4 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenCL version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| DirectX version | 12.1 | 12.1 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | AI engine with 32K MAC NPU | Hexagon |
| NPU theoretical performance | 59 TOPS | - |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR6 |
| Memory frequency | 5333 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 24 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 85.3 Gb/s | 113.8 Gb/s |
| Max size | 24 GB | 24 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2540 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 320MP | - |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Exynos 5410 | - |
| 4G support | - | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 14790 Mbps | - |
| Upload speed | Up to 4900 Mbps | - |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 6.1 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | December 2025 | September 2026 |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Model number | S5E9965 | SM8975 |
| Official page | Samsung Exynos 2600 official site | - |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 11