Samsung Exynos 8895 – an 8-core chipset that was announced on February 23, 2017, and is manufactured using a 10-nanometer process technology. It has 4 cores Exynos M2 at 2300 MHz and 4 cores Cortex-A53 at 1700 MHz.
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks
AnTuTu 9
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Samsung Exynos 8895
285581
| CPU |
77751 |
| GPU |
107899 |
| Memory |
38097 |
| UX |
63856 |
| Total score |
285581 |
GeekBench 5
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
| Image compression |
99.55 Mpixels/s |
| Face detection |
14.55 images/s |
| Speech recognition |
26.3 words/s |
| Machine learning |
20.35 images/s |
| Camera shooting |
15.55 images/s |
| HTML 5 |
1.52 Mnodes/s |
| SQLite |
475.7 Krows/s |
Smartphones
Click on the device name to view detailed information
Specifications
Detailed specifications of the Exynos 8895 SoC with Mali-G71 MP20 graphics
| Architecture |
4x 2.3 GHz – Exynos M2
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Cores |
8 |
| Frequency |
2300 MHz |
| Instruction set |
ARMv8-A |
| L2 cache |
2 MB |
| Process |
10 nanometers |
| Transistor count |
3 billion |
| TDP |
5 W |
| GPU name |
Mali-G71 MP20 |
| Architecture |
Bifrost |
| GPU frequency |
900 MHz |
| Execution units |
20 |
| Shading units |
320 |
| FLOPS |
349 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version |
1.0 |
| OpenCL version |
2.0 |
| DirectX version |
11 |
| Memory type |
LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency |
1866 MHz |
| Bus |
2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth |
29.8 Gbit/s |
| Max size |
4 GB |
| Neural processor (NPU) |
No |
| Storage type |
UFS 2.1 |
| Max display resolution |
3840 x 2400 |
| Max camera resolution |
1x 28MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture |
4K at 120FPS |
| Video playback |
4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs |
H.264, H.265, VP9 |
| Audio codecs |
192 kHz/24 bit |
| 4G support |
LTE Cat. 16 |
| 5G support |
No |
| Download speed |
Up to 1000 Mbps |
| Upload speed |
Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi |
5 |
| Bluetooth |
5.0 |
| Navigation |
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Comparison with competitors
