Exynos 8895 vs Exynos 1380

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 8895 (with Mali-G71 MP20 graphics) and Exynos 1380 (Mali-G68 MP5). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 8895
  • Supports 12% higher memory bandwidth (28.7 against 25.6 GB/s)
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1380
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 10 nm)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 76%) AnTuTu 11 score – 767K vs 435K
  • Higher GPU frequency (~74%)
  • Performs 16% better in floating-point computations

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
435852
767711
CPU 179410 320484
GPU 79605 91141
Memory 110545 113558
UX 66292 242528
Total score 435852 767711
Samples [16 tests] [113 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Exynos 1380 +141%
1008
Multi-Core Score
2710
Asset compression 79.3 MB/sec 146.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 43.9 pages/sec 64.4 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 50.9 Mpixels/sec 109.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 14.7 images/sec 53.7 images/sec
HDR 51.8 Mpixels/sec 95.9 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 2.74 images/sec 9.4 images/sec
Photo processing 11.8 images/sec 27.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.23 Mpixels/sec 4.23 Mpixels/sec
Samples 9 tests 56 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
3048
Background blur 7.22 images/sec 4.46 images/sec
Face detection 4.13 images/sec 2.17 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.21 Gpixels/sec 0.13 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.24 Gpixels/sec 0.19 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.17 Gpixels/sec 0.14 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.05 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 17 Gpixels/sec 9.21 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 628.1 FPS 538 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 3 tests 35 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 279
Stability - 98%
Graphics test - 2 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 808
Stability - 99%
Graphics test - 4 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 10597
Video editing score - 7345
Data manipulation score - 10909
Photo editing score - 25069
Writing score - 16185
Phones tested - 8 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 8895
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-03 (leo)AnTuTu 11421047
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 -> TranHongPhucGeekbench 6 CPU419 / 1445
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 -> TranHongPhucGeekbench 6 GPU1800
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 -> TranHongPhucGeekbench 6 CPU378 / 642
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 -> TranHongPhucAnTuTu 11399314
Samsung Exynos 1380
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-29 (Saveloy)AnTuTu 12717743
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-29 (Ankit)AnTuTu 12843613
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (P3RF3CT)AnTuTu 12866054
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 -> LessPlum3393AnTuTu 12857296
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (maksπŸ‡°πŸ‡Ώ)AnTuTu 12871135

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 8895 and Exynos 1380

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.314 GHz – Exynos M2
4x 1.69 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2314 MHz 2400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L2 cache 2 MB -
L3 cache - 4 MB
Process 10 nanometers 5 nanometers
Transistor count 3 billion -
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 5 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G71 MP20 Mali-G68 MP5
Architecture Bifrost 1st gen Valhall 2nd gen
GPU frequency 546 MHz 949 MHz
Pipelines 20 5
Shading units 12 32
Total shaders 240 160
FLOPS 262.1 Gigaflops 303.7 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) No Yes
NPU theoretical performance - 4.9 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 1800 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 32 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 28.7 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 6 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 28MP, 2x 16MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - 192 kHz/24 bit - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Shannon 355 -
4G support LTE Cat. 16 LTE Cat. 18
5G support No Yes
Download speed Up to 1000 Mbps Up to 3790 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 1280 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.0 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced February 2017 February 2023
Class Flagship Mid range
Model number S5E8895 S5E8835
Official page Samsung Exynos 8895 official site Samsung Exynos 1380 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2500 - Samsung Exynos 1580

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
16 (24.2%)
50 (75.8%)
Total votes: 66

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Exynos 1380 and Exynos 8895, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!