AMD Ryzen 9 7900X vs Ryzen 9 5900X

75 out of 100
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
VS
59 out of 100
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

We compared two 12-core desktop CPUs: the 4.7 GHz AMD Ryzen 9 7900X against the 3.7 GHz Ryzen 9 5900X. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop CPU.
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Value for money (Beta)

Global average CPU prices are used by default! For better accuracy, enter your current prices and click β€œCalculate".
Currency
VS
74.3
(Good)
Value Index
54.4
(Average)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 5900X and 7900X
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
  • Newer - released 2 years later
  • Supports up to 192 GB DDR5-5200 RAM
  • More modern manufacturing process – 5 versus 7 nanometers
  • Newer PCI Express version – 5.0
  • 27% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 2873 vs 2263 points
  • 17% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.6 GHz vs 4.8 GHz)
  • Includes an integrated GPU Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
1522
Cinebench Scores (65th and 112th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2873
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
18246
File compression 1810 MB/sec 1170 MB/sec
Clang compilation 175.1 Klines/sec 126 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 360.8 pages/sec 217.8 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 535.6 Mpixels/sec 362 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 299.8 pages/sec 232 pages/sec
Background blur 52.2 images/sec 38.7 images/sec
Photo processing 121.8 images/sec 85.1 images/sec
Ray tracing 39.1 Mpixels/sec 31.5 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 1096 & 441 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
4226
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
51226
Integer math 168.1 GOps/sec 139.7 GOps/sec
Floating point math 103.5 GOps/sec 77.6 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 389M Primes/sec 257M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 74.8M Strings/sec 51.5M Strings/sec
Data encryption 37.1 GBytes/sec 31 GBytes/sec
Data compression 629.8 MBytes/sec 498.8 MBytes/sec
Physics 3046 Frames/sec 1984 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 47.4B Matrices/sec 33.1B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 9482 & 27058 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
420.06
316.84

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 9 PPW 11.4 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 107.3 PPW 121 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 301.3 PPW 370.4 PPW
Blender / Watt 2.47 PPW 3.02 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-03 (afroman420IU)Cinebench 2024110 / 1302
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-11 (JDM)Cinebench 2024134 / 1165
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-27 (Avvy)Geekbench 6 CPU3320 / 14480
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-20 (Kev)Cinebench 2024120 / 1541
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-18 (NotHere3573)Cinebench 2024119 / 1550
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-19 (D)Cinebench 202467 / 893
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-02 (Zoli)Cinebench 202493 / 1254
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-12 (Otamatone)Cinebench 202492 / 981
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-08 (aref)Cinebench 202494 / 1015
πŸ“˜ 2025-08-15 (SnakeyB)Cinebench 2024120 / 380

Specifications

Full technical specification of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and Ryzen 9 5900X

General

Vendor Amd Amd
Released September 29, 2022 October 8, 2020
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Zen 4 (Raphael) Zen 3 (Vermeer)
Integrated GPU Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) No
Rival Equivalent - Intel Core i9 13900K - Intel Core i9 11900K
Successor - AMD Ryzen 9 9900X - AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (21st and 70th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 12 12
P-Threads 24 24
Base Frequency (P) 4.7 GHz 3.7 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.6 GHz 4.8 GHz
Total
Total Cores 12 12
Total Threads 24 24
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 47x 37x
L1 Cache 64K (per core) 64K (per core)
L2 Cache 1MB (per core) 512K (per core)
L3 Cache 64MB (shared) 64MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier Yes Yes

Package

Transistors 13.14 billions 4.15 billions
Fabrication Process 5 nm 7 nm
TDP (PL1) 170 W 105 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 230 W 142 W
Socket AM5 AM4
Peak Temperature 95Β°C 90Β°C
Desktop CPU ranking (39th and 83rd place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) -
GPU Base Clock 400 MHz -
GPU Boost Clock 2200 MHz -
Shading Units 128 -
TMUs 8 -
ROPs 4 -
Execution Units 2 -
TGP 15 W -
iGPU FLOPS
0.6 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-5200 - DDR4-3200
Max. Memory Size 192 GB 128 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth - 47.68 GB/s
ECC Support Yes Yes

Misc

Official Site AMD Ryzen 9 7900X official page AMD Ryzen 9 5900X official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 4.0
PCI Express Lanes 28 20

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
210 (57.9%)
153 (42.1%)
Total votes: 363

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X or Ryzen 9 7900X?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Eric June 12, 2023 at 10:02 PM
God... I'd feel pretty lame as well if the next-generation AM5 7900X produced such a massive leap in performance over the platform I just invested in not long ago. The 7900X can often be found to be priced for under $400 USD. Hell of a deal as a "jack of all trades" CPU - Great for gaming and everything else. The gaming benchmarks also show quite a substantial gain of the 5900X - AM5 cost more to "get in" but there are certainly advantages to this. Anyways there will always be people out there whom are just bitter that the platform they invested in ways simply left far behind - It's just how technology works - there will always be something superior just around the corner.
+1 Reply
Avatar
James October 9, 2022 at 02:53 AM
Have both the 5900x and 7900x now both running with 6900xt Radeon founders edition. To be honest, can't really tell the difference between the 2. Better single core performance for sure but at the cost of more power and heat to dissipate. If ya have a 5000 series I'd stick with it for the time is not worth replacing the mobo. Ram. Cooler at this point when the 5900x is still far from being a bottleneck.
+28 Reply
Avatar
Dutton October 7, 2022 at 12:03 PM
For me 30% performance gain single core is not enough to spend a big dollar. I'll wait 4-5 years.
+5 Reply
Avatar
Perry October 8, 2022 at 05:29 PM
I totally agree! If it’s not 50 or above not worth it really and granted you have to switch everything including the motherboard due to AM5 (in my case).
+7 Reply
Avatar
Peter October 1, 2022 at 07:22 PM
Up to 40% more power consumption, for up to 40% speed (multi-core). Not really a game changer if your CPU wasn't a bottleneck before. Iβ€˜ll stick with my 5900x.
+23 Reply