Intel Core i9 14900 vs i9 13900

We compared two 24-core desktop CPUs: the 2.0 GHz Intel Core i9 14900 against the 2.0 GHz i9 13900. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop CPU.
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
🔌 Usage Scenario:

Value for money (Beta)

Global average CPU prices are used by default! For better accuracy, enter your current prices and click “Calculate".
Currency
VS
35.6
(Mediocre)
Value Index
34.2
(Mediocre)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 13900 and 14900
Advantages of Intel Core i9 14900
  • Newer - released 1 year later
  • 12% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.8 GHz vs 5.2 GHz)

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench Scores (20th and 22nd place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
17953
File compression 1260 MB/sec 1280 MB/sec
Clang compilation 189.3 Klines/sec 181.1 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 389.6 pages/sec 392.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 486.5 Mpixels/sec 466.4 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 292.3 pages/sec 283.3 pages/sec
Background blur 68.5 images/sec 64.4 images/sec
Photo processing 135.6 images/sec 134.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 42.4 Mpixels/sec 41.8 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]37 & 635 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 174.9 GOps/sec 172.6 GOps/sec
Floating point math 120.2 GOps/sec 117.9 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 188M Primes/sec 182M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 61M Strings/sec 62.3M Strings/sec
Data encryption 33.5 GBytes/sec 34.2 GBytes/sec
Data compression 549.9 MBytes/sec 559.3 MBytes/sec
Physics 2486 Frames/sec 2425 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 30.6B Matrices/sec 31.7B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4]956 & 830 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
410.58
384.67

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 31.8 PPW 31.7 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 276.2 PPW 271.4 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 685.6 PPW 686.4 PPW
Blender / Watt 6.32 PPW 5.92 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core i9 14900
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2023-12-28 (Aj)Cinebench 2024124 / 2069
Intel Core i9 13900
No benchmark results yet

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i9 14900 and i9 13900

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released January 9, 2024 January 3, 2023
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Raptor Lake Refresh Raptor Lake
Model number i9-14900 i9-13900
Integrated GPU UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 9 7900 - AMD Ryzen 9 7900
Successor - Intel Core Ultra 9 285 - Intel Core Ultra 9 285
Intel CPU rating (21st and 25th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 8 8
P-Threads 16 16
Base Frequency (P) 2.0 GHz 2.0 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.8 GHz 5.2 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 16 16
E-Threads 16 16
Base Frequency (E) 1.5 GHz 1.5 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.3 GHz 4.2 GHz
Total
Total Cores 24 24
Total Threads 32 32
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 20x 20x
L1 Cache 80K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 2MB (per core) 2MB (per core)
L3 Cache 36MB (shared) 36MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 10 nm 10 nm
TDP (PL1) 65 W 65 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 219 W 219 W
Socket LGA-1700 LGA-1700
Peak Temperature 100°C 100°C
Desktop CPU ranking (31st and 36th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 770 Intel UHD Graphics 770
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1650 MHz 1650 MHz
Shading Units 256 256
TMUs 16 16
ROPs 8 8
Execution Units 32 32
TGP 15 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
0.8 TFLOPS
0.8 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-5600
- DDR4-3200
- DDR5-5600
- DDR4-3200
Max. Memory Size 192 GB 192 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 89.6 GB/s 89.6 GB/s
ECC Support Yes Yes

Misc

Official Site Intel Core i9 14900 official page Intel Core i9 13900 official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 20 20

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
22 (37.9%)
36 (62.1%)
Total votes: 58

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core i9 13900 or i9 14900?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
jake October 18, 2023 at 10:04 PM
I will continue using my i9 13900 because the specifications are identical, with only a slight .02% increase in speed on the 14900. Intel should have made more significant changes, perhaps adding more quad cores or P cores or threads. Maybe they could have improved the onboard graphics card as well. In my opinion, after reading the new 14th gen CPU specs, it doesn't seem like it's worth the upgrade, unless you're migrating from a much older Intel CPU. I build my own computers.
+19 Reply