Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX vs Ultra 7 155H

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2.4 GHz Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX with 20-cores against the 1.4 GHz Ultra 7 155H with 16-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 155H and 255HX
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
  • Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-6400 RAM
  • More modern manufacturing process – 3 versus 7 nanometers
  • Unlocked multiplier
  • Newer - released 1 year and 1 month later
  • Has 4 more physical cores
  • Has 6 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • 19% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 2888 vs 2421 points
  • 8% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.2 GHz vs 4.8 GHz)
  • Around 12.8 GB/s (14%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  • More powerful Arc Graphics (8-Cores) integrated graphics: 4.6 vs 1.9 TFLOPS

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) - 544
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) - 3749
Cinebench Scores (47th and 163rd place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1140 MB/sec 1220 MB/sec
Clang compilation 149.8 Klines/sec 100.8 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 312.2 pages/sec 270.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 423.9 Mpixels/sec 356.1 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 335.6 pages/sec 243.4 pages/sec
Background blur 64.1 images/sec 49.2 images/sec
Photo processing 111.8 images/sec 117.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 31.1 Mpixels/sec 19.4 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 910 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 127 GOps/sec 85.8 GOps/sec
Floating point math 160.3 GOps/sec 62.5 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 400M Primes/sec 113M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 62.4M Strings/sec 31.6M Strings/sec
Data encryption 39.4 GBytes/sec 16.1 GBytes/sec
Data compression 513.6 MBytes/sec 273.8 MBytes/sec
Physics 2916 Frames/sec 1701 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 41.1B Matrices/sec 16.2B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 976 & 6648 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 32 PPW 14.7 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 328 PPW 192.5 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 874.8 PPW 377.1 PPW
Blender / Watt 7.11 PPW 2.65 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-05 (Levi)GeekBench2907 / 17742
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-25 (Junebug)Cinebench 2024131 / 1759
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-17 (balihardik009)Cinebench 2024131 / 1820
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-26 (Verbickisd)Cinebench 2024125 / 1666
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-24 (Abhi)GeekBench2823 / 17264
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-22 (Alex Paulino)Cinebench 2026544 / 3749
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-15 (Ak-Dev)GeekBench2347 / 12862
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-08 (Anuj)GeekBench2248 / 12118
πŸ“˜ 2025-07-25 (Aya)Cinebench 202485 / 943
πŸ“˜ 2025-06-25 (Tarekcoupe)Cinebench 202496 / 930

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX and Ultra 7 155H

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released January 6, 2025 December 14, 2023
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Arrow Lake Meteor Lake
Model number 255HX 155H
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics (4-Cores) Arc Graphics (8-Cores)
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 380 - AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
Successor - - Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
Intel CPU rating (29th and 99th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 8 6
P-Threads 8 12
Base Frequency (P) 2.4 GHz 1.4 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.2 GHz 4.8 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 12 10
E-Threads 12 10
Base Frequency (E) 1.8 GHz 0.9 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.5 GHz 3.8 GHz
Total
Total Cores 20 16
Total Threads 20 22
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 24x 14x
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 112K (per core)
L2 Cache 2MB (per core) 2MB (per core)
L3 Cache 30MB (shared) 24MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier Yes No

Package

Fabrication Process 3 nm 7 nm
TDP (PL1) 45-55 W (configurable) 20-65 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 160 W 115 W
Socket FCBGA-2114 FCBGA-2049
Peak Temperature 105Β°C 110Β°C
Laptop processors ranking (33rd and 127th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Arc Graphics (4-Cores) Arc Graphics (8-Cores)
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1850 MHz 2250 MHz
Shading Units 512 1024
TMUs 32 64
ROPs 16 32
Execution Units 64 128
TGP 14 W 28 W
iGPU FLOPS
1.9 TFLOPS
4.6 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-6400 - LPDDR5-7467
- LPDDR5x-7467
- DDR5-5600
Max. Memory Size 256 GB 96 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 102.4 GB/s 89.6 GB/s
ECC Support Yes No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX official page Intel Core Ultra 7 155H official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 24 28

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
8 (61.5%)
5 (38.5%)
Total votes: 13

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H or Ultra 7 255HX?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!