Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-64-100) vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 3.4 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-64-100) with 10-cores against the 1.4 GHz Intel Core Ultra 7 155H with 16-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 155H and (X1P-64-100)
Advantages of Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-64-100)
  • More modern manufacturing process – 4 versus 7 nanometers
  • Around 45.6 GB/s (51%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  • Has 18 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • Has 6 more physical cores
  • Supports up to 96 GB LPDDR5-7467 RAM
  • Newer PCI Express version – 5.0
  • More powerful Arc Graphics (8-Cores) integrated graphics: 4.6 vs 3.7 TFLOPS

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) - 544
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) - 3749
Cinebench Scores (193rd and 165th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1090 MB/sec 1220 MB/sec
Clang compilation 119.5 Klines/sec 100.8 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 337.1 pages/sec 270.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 376.7 Mpixels/sec 356.1 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 227 pages/sec 243.4 pages/sec
Background blur 58.2 images/sec 49.2 images/sec
Photo processing 112.1 images/sec 117.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 19.9 Mpixels/sec 19.4 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 910 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 53.6 GOps/sec 85.8 GOps/sec
Floating point math 81.3 GOps/sec 62.5 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 266M Primes/sec 113M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 30.9M Strings/sec 31.6M Strings/sec
Data encryption 13.1 GBytes/sec 16.1 GBytes/sec
Data compression 210.7 MBytes/sec 273.8 MBytes/sec
Physics 1789 Frames/sec 1701 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 14.5B Matrices/sec 16.2B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 181 & 6648 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 24.4 PPW 14.7 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 380.1 PPW 192.5 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 611.4 PPW 377.1 PPW
Blender / Watt 6.31 PPW 2.65 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-64-100)
No benchmark results yet
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-22 (Alex Paulino)Cinebench 2026544 / 3749
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-15 (Ak-Dev)Geekbench 6 CPU2347 / 12862
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-08 (Anuj)Geekbench 6 CPU2248 / 12118
πŸ“˜ 2025-07-25 (Aya)Cinebench 202485 / 943
πŸ“˜ 2025-06-25 (Tarekcoupe)Cinebench 202496 / 930

Specifications

Full technical specification of Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-64-100) and Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

General

Vendor Qualcomm Intel
Released April 24, 2024 December 14, 2023
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set ARMv9 x86-64
Codename Snapdragon X Meteor Lake
Model number X1P-64-100 155H
Integrated GPU Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 Arc Graphics (8-Cores)
Rival Equivalent - Apple M3 - AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
Successor - - Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
Intel CPU rating (#99th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 10 6
P-Threads 10 12
Base Frequency (P) 3.4 GHz 1.4 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) - 4.8 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores - 10
E-Threads - 10
Base Frequency (E) - 0.9 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) - 3.8 GHz
Total
Total Cores 10 16
Total Threads 10 22
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 34x 14x
L1 Cache 288K (per core) 112K (per core)
L2 Cache 12MB (shared) 2MB (per core)
L3 Cache 6MB (shared) 24MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 4 nm 7 nm
TDP (PL1) 35 W 20-65 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 45 W 115 W
Socket Custom FCBGA-2049
Peak Temperature - 110Β°C
Die Size 172.7 mmΒ² -
Laptop processors ranking (112th and 128th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 Arc Graphics (8-Cores)
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1250 MHz 2250 MHz
Shading Units 1536 1024
TMUs 96 64
ROPs 48 32
Execution Units 6 128
TGP 30 W 28 W
iGPU FLOPS
4.6 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5X-8448 - LPDDR5-7467
- LPDDR5x-7467
- DDR5-5600
Max. Memory Size 64 GB 96 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 135.2 GB/s 89.6 GB/s
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-64-100) official page Intel Core Ultra 7 155H official page
PCI Express Version 4.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 12 28

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
30 (42.3%)
41 (57.7%)
Total votes: 71

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H or Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-64-100)?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!