Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada vs Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core)

We performed a head-to-head comparison of the Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada 48 GB with 142 pipelines and 18176 shaders against the 1 year and 11 months newer Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core) that utilizes 640 pipelines and 5120 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score
The "Energy Efficiency" metric has less impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop GPU.

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of M4 Max GPU (40-core) over RTX 6000 Ada
Reasons to consider the Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada
  • Performs significantly better (up to 2.2x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 5.6x higher maximum theoretical performance (91.1 vs 16.2 TFLOPS)
  • Includes 48 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory
  • Achieves 3.3x more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (389K vs 116K)
  • Supports Nvidia DLSS 3 technology
  • Has 3.6x more shading units (18176 vs 5120)
  • Has 76% higher memory bandwidth: 960 vs 546 GB/s
Reasons to consider the Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
231
168
153
125
-
The Witcher 3
246
212
152
80
-
Counter-Strike 2
313
219
173
83
-
Far Cry 6
175
160
148
91
-
Hogwarts Legacy
164
137
108
60
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
220
214
174
116
-
Ghost of Tsushima
148
124
110
68
-
Cyberpunk 2077
196
172
123
58
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
287
267
201
109
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 220 -
1080p Ultra 186 -
1440p Ultra 149 -
4K Ultra 88 -
Margin of Error High Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 26529 -
Solar Bay 145429 61312
Port Royal 19497 -
Fire Strike 62803 -
Wild Life Extreme 53640 36641
Night Raid 148225 -
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
RTX 6000 Ada +234%
389848
Background Blur 618.3 img/sec 195 img/sec
Face Detection 399.9 img/sec 125.9 img/sec
Horizon Detection 15.1 Gpixels/sec 4.82 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 22.1 Gpixels/sec 7.47 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 26.3 Gpixels/sec 5.8 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 2.33 Gpixels/sec 1.06 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 2210 Gpixels/sec 417.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 53494.5 FPS 17079.9 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 1007 -
DirectX 11 284 FPS -
DirectX 12 101 FPS -
GPU Compute 22506 Ops/s -
Sources: PassMark [5] – 276 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
RTX 6000 Ada +113%
11087.8
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 113 & 460 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada
No benchmark results yet
Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core)
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2025-07-10 (thomas)Geekbench 6 OpenCL116478

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 13367 10302
Image Segmentation (HP) 32477 23763
Image Super Resolution (Q) 42056 29314
Face Detection (HP) 69004 42016
Pose Estimation (Q) 230965 105972
Text Classification (SP) 3491 2963
Machine Translation (HP) 5545 6594
Object Detection (SP) 18668 8935
Depth Estimation (Q) 68370 43143
Style Transfer (SP) 520389 221563
Framework ONNX Core ML
Backend DirectML GPU
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]
Results were compared using different ML frameworks

Specifications

Technical specifications of Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada and Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core)

General

Vendor Nvidia Apple
Build Discrete Integrated
Released December 3, 2022 October 30, 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $6800 -
Case Desktop Laptop
Purpose Professional Professional
Segment High-end Mid-range
Architecture Ada Lovelace Apple M GPU
GPU Codename AD102 Custom
Rival Equivalent - - GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop
Successor - - Apple M5 Max GPU (40-core)
Recommended CPU - Intel Core i9 14900K or above - Apple M4 Max (16-Core) or above
Used in CPUs - - Apple M4 Max (16-Core)
Desktop GPU rating (#5th place)
Laptop GPU ranking (#14th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 915 MHz 500 MHz
Boost Clock 2505 MHz 1578 MHz
Shading Units 18176 5120
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 568 320
Render Output Units (ROPs) 192 160
Compute Units (Pipelines) 142 640
Tensor Cores 568 -
Ray-tracing Cores 142 -
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster -
L2 Cache 96MB shared -
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 481 GPixel/s 252 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 1423 GTexel/s 505 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
RTX 6000 Ada +462%
91.1 TFLOPS
16.2 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 Custom
TGP 300 W 50 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 5 nm 3 nm
Die Size 609 mm² -
Transistor Count 76 billion -
Transistor Density 124.79 MTr/mm² -
Max. Temperature - 100°C

Memory

Memory Type GDDR6 System Shared
Memory Size 48 GB -
Memory Clock 2500 MHz 8533 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 20000 Mbps -
Bus 384-bit 512-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth
960 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 -
Vulkan 1.3 -
OpenGL 4.6 -
OpenCL 3.0 -
CUDA 8.9 -
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS DLSS 3 No
DisplayPort 1.4a -

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
3 (50%)
3 (50%)
Total votes: 6

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
ComputerNerd March 9, 2026 at 11:14 PM
Easily the Nvidia RTX Ada 6000, but it comes with a large TDP (300 watts). The M4 Max is the most efficient, but it doesn't compete with the big dog in the extreme GPU market. Looking forward to seeing what the M5 Max and M6 Max do in the upcoming year.
0 Reply