Nvidia RTX A2000 Laptop vs 2000 Laptop (Ada)

We compared two discrete laptop professional GPUs: the Nvidia RTX A2000 Mobile 4 GB with 20 pipelines and 2560 shaders against the 2 years newer 2000 Mobile (Ada) 8 GB that utilizes 24 pipelines and 3072 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of RTX 2000 Mobile (Ada) over RTX A2000 Mobile
Reasons to consider the Nvidia RTX 2000 Laptop (Ada)
  • Performs significantly better (up to 89%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Shows 79% higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 52 vs 29 FPS
  • 67% higher maximum theoretical performance (14.5 vs 8.7 TFLOPS)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 5 nm process technology
  • Includes 4 GB more video memory
  • Supports Nvidia DLSS 3 technology
  • Achieves 43% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (81K vs 57K)
  • Has 33% higher memory bandwidth: 256 vs 192 GB/s

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
73
41
32
17
103
63
52
35
The Witcher 3
63
51
31
18
111
93
66
35
Counter-Strike 2
105
72
49
19
168
123
86
40
Far Cry 6
59
50
36
20
86
79
59
33
Hogwarts Legacy
33
28
21
10
61
48
36
19
CoD: Modern Warfare III
44
35
22
18
74
66
45
30
Ghost of Tsushima
31
26
18
10
56
43
31
20
Cyberpunk 2077
36
30
20
-
63
53
33
12
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
63
57
35
18
97
90
61
31
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 56 91
1080p Ultra 43 73
1440p Ultra 29 52
4K Ultra 15 28
Margin of Error Low High

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 4796 7446
Solar Bay 19912 30392
Port Royal 2920 4537
Fire Strike 11732 18845
Wild Life Extreme 8828 14651
Night Raid 50295 76011
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 92.8 img/sec 149.7 img/sec
Face Detection 54.2 img/sec 88.5 img/sec
Horizon Detection 2.47 Gpixels/sec 3.24 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 3.32 Gpixels/sec 4.3 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 2.63 Gpixels/sec 4.3 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.7 Gpixels/sec 1.06 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 236.9 Gpixels/sec 278.2 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 7148.8 FPS 9706.8 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 508 600
DirectX 11 64 FPS 123 FPS
DirectX 12 47 FPS 66 FPS
GPU Compute 4222 Ops/s 5624 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 2124 & 2156 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
2496.41
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 76 & 146 samples

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 4240 6324
Image Segmentation (HP) 9190 13952
Image Super Resolution (Q) 9374 19043
Face Detection (HP) 18335 28439
Pose Estimation (Q) 36989 69947
Text Classification (SP) 2035 2887
Machine Translation (HP) 2687 3267
Object Detection (SP) 5174 7742
Depth Estimation (Q) 16537 29911
Style Transfer (SP) 77854 131880
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Nvidia RTX A2000 Laptop and 2000 Laptop (Ada)

General

Vendor Nvidia Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Released April 12, 2021 March 21, 2023
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Professional Professional
Segment Mid-range Mid-range
Architecture Ampere Ada Lovelace
GPU Codename GA106 AD107
Successor - Nvidia RTX 2000 Laptop (Ada) -
Recommended CPU - Intel Core i7 12800H or above - Intel Core Ultra 7 165H or above
Laptop GPU ranking (89th and 58th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 735-1463 MHz (configurable) -
Boost Clock 1035-1695 MHz (configurable) 1245-2360 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 2560 3072
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 80 96
Render Output Units (ROPs) 48 48
Compute Units (Pipelines) 20 24
Tensor Cores 80 96
Ray-tracing Cores 20 24
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache 2MB shared 32MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 50-81 GPixel/s 60-113 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 83-136 GTexel/s 120-227 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
5.3-8.7 TFLOPS
7.6-14.5 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 60-95 W (configurable) 35-140 W (configurable)
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC
Fabrication Process 8 nm 5 nm
Die Size 276 mm² 159 mm²
Transistor Count 12 billion 18.9 billion
Transistor Density 43.48 MTr/mm² 118.87 MTr/mm²
Max. Temperature - 95°C

Memory

Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Size 4 GB 8 GB
Memory Clock 1500 MHz 2000 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 12000 Mbps 16000 Mbps
Bus 128-bit 128-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
256 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
CUDA 8.6 8.9
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS DLSS 2 DLSS 3
DisplayPort 1.4a 1.4a

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!